Re: [freenet-dev] Shipping 0.8 was Re: What next?

2014-11-18 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 11/18/2014 08:39 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 11/17/2014 02:14 AM, Florent Daigniere wrote: ... >> - a "better" windows installer (various bugs are in deer need of fixing) > > Oh? Are there any of these [0] you categorize as such? > > - Steve > > [0] https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view_al

Re: [freenet-dev] Shipping 0.8 was Re: What next?

2014-11-18 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 11/17/2014 02:14 AM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 18:26 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On 16/11/14 17:30, Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> On 16/11/14 16:36, Ian Clarke wrote: We're in an interesting situation. The world finally appears to really care about the thing

Re: [freenet-dev] Shipping 0.8 was Re: What next?

2014-11-16 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 18:26 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 16/11/14 17:30, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On 16/11/14 16:36, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> We're in an interesting situation. The world finally appears to really > >> care about the things that Freenet has been about from the very beginnin

[freenet-dev] Shipping 0.8 was Re: What next?

2014-11-16 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 16/11/14 17:30, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 16/11/14 16:36, Ian Clarke wrote: >> We're in an interesting situation. The world finally appears to really >> care about the things that Freenet has been about from the very beginning a >> decade and a half ago (most of the publicity back then viewe