Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

2016-02-07 Thread Peter Todd
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:19:34PM -0600, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > In practice what you can do with Bitcoin script is severely restricted > > > by the

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

2016-02-04 Thread Peter Todd
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:06:57PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 04/02/16 20:32, Ian Clarke wrote: > > I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts > > , and I'm surprised by the > > similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the

Re: [freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

2016-02-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
On 04/02/16 20:32, Ian Clarke wrote: > I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts > , and I'm surprised by the > similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the original > proposal for SSKs from

[freenet-dev] Similarity between original SSK proposal and Bitcoin contracts

2016-02-04 Thread Ian Clarke
I've been reading about Bitcoin Contracts , and I'm surprised by the similarity between these and, not just SSKs, but particularly the original proposal for SSKs from way back in June 2000, which involved a stack