* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-28 21:54:34]:
> On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
> >
> > > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
> functioning
> > > site.
> > >
> >
> > Done in r19577
>
> Is this a
On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
>
> > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
functioning
> > site.
> >
>
> Done in r19577
Is this a good idea? We don't want to be identifiable from which STUN server
* Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-28 21:54:34]:
> On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > * Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
> >
> > > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
> functioning
> > > site.
> > >
>
On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
>
> > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
functioning
> > site.
> >
>
> Done in r19577
Is this a good idea? We don't want to be identifiable fro
* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
> ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
> functioning
> site.
>
Done in r19577
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
* Sven-Ola Tücke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-26 00:01:36]:
> ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a
> functioning
> site.
>
Done in r19577
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetp
...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a functioning
site.
// Sven-Ola
...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a functioning
site.
// Sven-Ola
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
