[freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread Florent Daignière (NextGen$)
* Matthew Toseland [2007-04-12 18:16:26]: > Okay, in summary: Almost everything described below has been implemented in r12615 and prior that... check it :) Ok, I got rid of TestFileAccess messages. > > WRITE ACCESS > > > Write access has to be per directory. The reason for

[freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
Okay, in summary: WRITE ACCESS Write access has to be per directory. The reason for this is that we cannot write to an existing file created by the client: We have to write to a temporary file in the same dir and then rename over the target, to avoid symlink attacks. Thus the

[freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread Matthew Toseland
Okay, in summary: WRITE ACCESS Write access has to be per directory. The reason for this is that we cannot write to an existing file created by the client: We have to write to a temporary file in the same dir and then rename over the target, to avoid symlink attacks. Thus the

Re: [freenet-dev] TestDDA etc was Re: FYI: Next Frost release

2007-04-12 Thread NextGen$
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-12 18:16:26]: Okay, in summary: Almost everything described below has been implemented in r12615 and prior that... check it :) Ok, I got rid of TestFileAccess messages. WRITE ACCESS Write access has to be per directory. The