[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-07 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Thursday 07 November 2002 0:24 am, harik at chaos.ao.net wrote: > On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Jay Oliveri wrote: > > If someone can verify this please let me know and I will commit and > > update the tarballs, cvs stable branch, etc.. > > > > The patch is located at: > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/

Re: [freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-07 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Thursday 07 November 2002 0:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Jay Oliveri wrote: > > If someone can verify this please let me know and I will commit and > > update the tarballs, cvs stable branch, etc.. > > > > The patch is located at: > > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipe

[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-07 Thread ha...@chaos.ao.net
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Jay Oliveri wrote: > If someone can verify this please let me know and I will commit and > update the tarballs, cvs stable branch, etc.. > > The patch is located at: > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-November/002370.html Are the windows builds done in DJG

Re: [freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-06 Thread harik
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Jay Oliveri wrote: > If someone can verify this please let me know and I will commit and > update the tarballs, cvs stable branch, etc.. > > The patch is located at: > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-November/002370.html Are the windows builds done in DJ

[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-06 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 6:08 am, harik at chaos.ao.net wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, wts42 at hushmail.com wrote: > > The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite > > work. > > > > If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with > > fcpputsite -R FILE

Re: [freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-06 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 6:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite > > work. > > > > If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with > > fcpputsite -R FILE, I'll e

[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-06 Thread ha...@chaos.ao.net
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, wts42 at hushmail.com wrote: > > The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite work. > > If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with > fcpputsite -R FILE, I'll end up with two new files: > FILE.new will have the CHK's for file4 a

Re: [freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-06 Thread harik
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite work. > > If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with fcpputsite -R >FILE, I'll end up with two new files: > FILE.new will have the CHK's for file4 and fi

[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-01 Thread wts42
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite work. If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with fcpputsite -R FILE, I'll end up with two new files: FILE.new will have the CHK's for file4 and file5 FILE will have the

[freenet-dev] bug report: fcpputsite -R

2002-11-01 Thread wt...@hushmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- The -R option for the windows version of fcpputsute does not quite work. If I use upload five files (file1, file2, file3, file4, file5) with fcpputsite -R FILE, I'll end up with two new files: FILE.new will have the CHK's for file4 and file5 FILE will have the