On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:56:59AM -0800, pineapple wrote:
> Uh, yes the idea is that NGR does work, but not while
> the network is overloaded. To reduce load, your
> options are limited to: adding more resources,
> improving routing and reducing queries. My proposal
> addresses reducing queries;
Uh, yes the idea is that NGR does work, but not while
the network is overloaded. To reduce load, your
options are limited to: adding more resources,
improving routing and reducing queries. My proposal
addresses reducing queries; which is what exponential
backing off is supposed to do but does not
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is an interesting idea...
>
> Ed
>
The problem with MinHTL is that if everyone is overloaded (as the case
seems to be), the request will only be able to travel (MaxHTL-MinHTL)
hops into the network (once its HTL hits the average loaded Min
Hi,
This is an interesting idea...
Ed
On December 02, 2003 07:26 am, pineapple wrote:
> I propose the following method for reducing load on
> the network which, hopefully, would giving NGR a
> chance to optimize routing and so further reduce
> network load. My suggestion is to have a MinHTL
> p
I propose the following method for reducing load on
the network which, hopefully, would giving NGR a
chance to optimize routing and so further reduce
network load. My suggestion is to have a MinHTL
paramater. As the node becomes overloaded, the node
will increase it's MinHTL toward MaxHTL. Now,
