> > > Since with nio we can afford to keep 256-512 connections open (and well
> > > tuned uber-nodes can go way over 1000), we should rethink whether LRU is
> > > still the best strategy for replacing existing connections. Currently
> > > the connection that has had least activity is being dropped
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:03 pm, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > Since with nio we can afford to keep 256-512 connections open (and well
> > tuned uber-nodes can go way over 1000), we should rethink whether LRU is
> > still the best strat
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:03 pm, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> Since with nio we can afford to keep 256-512 connections open (and well
> tuned uber-nodes can go way over 1000), we should rethink whether LRU is
> still the best strategy for replacing existing connections. Currently
> the connection tha
Since with nio we can afford to keep 256-512 connections open (and well
tuned uber-nodes can go way over 1000), we should rethink whether LRU is
still the best strategy for replacing existing connections. Currently
the connection that has had least activity is being dropped when a new
one is n
