On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:02:58AM +0300, Costas Dokolas wrote:
> Sorry to bother you personally. I've not seen messages about memory leaks
> often, and I'm now wondering why they would appear with Java being
> specifically designed against this possibility. Is it a JVM defect? Is there
> a way to
Stupid me! I posted this to the list when I wanted to send it directly to
zab.
Just ignore it :(
> -Original Message-
> From: Costas Dokolas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [freenet-dev] target upti
From: Zlatin Balevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 8:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-dev] target uptime
>
>
> My node deadlocked after 15 hrs of uptime in a
> particularily-hard-to-debug deadlock. We are also still
> leaking me
My node deadlocked after 15 hrs of uptime in a
particularily-hard-to-debug deadlock. We are also still leaking memory,
only very slowly. To debug these issues we'll need a _LOT_ of time.
Its a lot more practical to decide on a target uptime which will be Good
Enough (tm) for a 0.5.2 release.
