Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> > committers.
>
> Coul
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> > committers.
>
> Coul
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so I really need
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so I really need
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
> > only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
>
> Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
> pulling if they like a pa
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
> > only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
>
> Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
> pulling if they like a pa
