> I really don't like the wording 'lite' and 'standard'. IMHO 'standard'
should be without Java and something
> like 'complete' for the Java including part.
I must debate this one.
We need to comprehend the windows newbie's mind-set.
(Unless something in the Freenet mission statement has changed
ril 20, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] 0.3.8.2 release?
>
> > We could have 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past,
and
> > 'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
>
> Yes! Please do this.
>
>
>
From: "Ian Clarke"
>Cool. What would be extremely desirable, but not nescessary easy, would
>be a unix script which can generate the Windows builds This would
>make the release process much easier, and would allow us to create
>automatic daily builds again.
One question, Ian and co.
How do
e 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past, and
'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
Opinions?
David
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon"
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] 0.3.8.2 release?
>
> I
"David McNab" wrote on 20.4.2001 01:24:33:
>
>I've had success with embedding the JRE into a client installer.
>Sun are very clear about their requirements for JRE redistro - required file
>set etc.
>
>I'm confident I can make a fully-compliant installer with JRE built in, one
>which doesn't even
avid
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Späth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Freenet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: FW:Re: [freenet-devl] 0.3.8.2 release?
> "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20.4
> "SS" == Sebastian Sp?th writes:
> "SS" == Sebastian Späth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SS> I really don't like the wording 'lite' and 'standard'. IMHO
SS> 'standard' should be without Java and something like
SS> 'complete' for the Java including part. We don't really want
SS> to trick newbies into downloading
"David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20.4.2001 01:24:33:
>
>I've had success with embedding the JRE into a client installer.
>Sun are very clear about their requirements for JRE redistro - required file
>set etc.
>
>I'm confident I can make a fully-compliant installer with JRE built in, one
> One question, Ian and co.
> How do you guys feel about 'wine'?
> If you don't mind running under wine, then the installer gen can already be
> run under linux.
> 'wine' shouldn't have any problems with it - it's totally console-based..
The proper way to go about doing linux installation is to p
solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
>much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: [freenet
> One question, Ian and co.
> How do you guys feel about 'wine'?
> If you don't mind running under wine, then the installer gen can already be
> run under linux.
> 'wine' shouldn't have any problems with it - it's totally console-based..
The proper way to go about doing linux installation is to
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cool. What would be extremely desirable, but not nescessary easy, would
>be a unix script which can generate the Windows builds This would
>make the release process much easier, and would allow us to create
>automatic daily builds again.
One question
]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] 0.3.8.2 release?
>
> > We could have 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past,
and
> > 'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
>
> Yes! Plea
> We could have 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past, and
> 'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
Yes! Please do this.
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Fri
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:24:33AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> I've had success with embedding the JRE into a client installer.
> Sun are very clear about their requirements for JRE redistro - required file
> set etc.
>
> I'm confident I can make a fully-compliant installer with JRE built in, one
> We could have 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past, and
> 'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
Yes! Please do this.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:24:33AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> I've had success with embedding the JRE into a client installer.
> Sun are very clear about their requirements for JRE redistro - required file
> set etc.
>
> I'm confident I can make a fully-compliant installer with JRE built in, one
d have 'Freenet Lite' (no Java) - as has been done in the past, and
'Freenet Standard' (JRE built in).
Opinions?
David
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Re:
I've fixed the key index bugs. Now I just need to remove the 1.2isms.
I'd like to suggest that we include an option to have Sun's JRE bundled
and automatically installed in the next release. That will solve quite a
few problems for new users, I think. It will require some changes to the
installer
> Well, I am not sure that that much has changed apart from a serious bug
> in the Windows installer which prevented it from working with jview (I
> believe the solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
> much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
I'd
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:48:46PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> I've fixed the key index bugs. Now I just need to remove the 1.2isms.
>
> I'd like to suggest that we include an option to have Sun's JRE bundled
> and automatically installed in the next release. That will solve quite a
> few problems
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:48:46PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> I've fixed the key index bugs. Now I just need to remove the 1.2isms.
>
> I'd like to suggest that we include an option to have Sun's JRE bundled
> and automatically installed in the next release. That will solve quite a
> few problems
I've fixed the key index bugs. Now I just need to remove the 1.2isms.
I'd like to suggest that we include an option to have Sun's JRE bundled
and automatically installed in the next release. That will solve quite a
few problems for new users, I think. It will require some changes to the
installe
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:00:19PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> I have a couple of bugs I'd like to fix. I can probably get to that
> tonight.
I am going to NY tomorrow morning, but perhaps Mr Bad could do a release
this weekend?
Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was s
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:00:19PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> I have a couple of bugs I'd like to fix. I can probably get to that
> tonight.
I am going to NY tomorrow morning, but perhaps Mr Bad could do a release
this weekend?
Ian.
PGP signature
> Well, I am not sure that that much has changed apart from a serious bug
> in the Windows installer which prevented it from working with jview (I
> believe the solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
> much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
I'
Was there any work required on the fproxy security filter?
I looked at a couple of older bugs (space in URLs and leaking threads on
security warning), but couldn't reproduce them. Maybe they were fixed
while I was away.
So let me know if there's anything outstanding.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:
Well, I am not sure that that much has changed apart from a serious bug
in the Windows installer which prevented it from working with jview (I
believe the solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
Thoughts?
I
lieve the solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
>much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:53 PM
Subje
Was there any work required on the fproxy security filter?
I looked at a couple of older bugs (space in URLs and leaking threads on
security warning), but couldn't reproduce them. Maybe they were fixed
while I was away.
So let me know if there's anything outstanding.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11
Well, I am not sure that that much has changed apart from a serious bug
in the Windows installer which prevented it from working with jview (I
believe the solution is to prevent it from working with jview), and a
much improved fproxy gateway page (with much more tasteful colours etc).
Thoughts?
32 matches
Mail list logo
