Stopped & restarted freenet node (Windows). Now it
won't start, and it flashes the bunny rabbit with the
line through.
Seems like the routing table got corrupt. I had
rtMaxNodes and rtMaxRefs each set to 9, however.
Jan 22, 2002 7:56:45 PM
(freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore, main): I/
Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:46:19PM -0500, Jack Duggan wrote:
>
>>I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
>>always give the latest snapshot.
>>
>>Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
>>freenet-webinstall.ex
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:23:51AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Tough, because the web-installer is supposed to be able to update
> existing installations. I honestly have no clue how I could detect the
> case of an "old-type" installation and delete it only in this case.
Look for a .store d
I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
always give the latest snapshot.
Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
freenet-webinstall.exe. Now, I cannot even get the GATEWAY to open, once
Freenet is started, and Frost will no lo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:46:19PM -0500, Jack Duggan wrote:
>
> I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
> always give the latest snapshot.
>
> Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
> freenet-webinstall.exe. Now, I cannot eve
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:45, you wrote:
>Hi,
> (Is there a better place to report bugs?)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?group_id=978&atid=100978
I already entered this under:
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=493418&group_id=978&atid=100978)
Hi Robert:
Sorr
Hi,
(Is there a better place to report bugs?)
the two forms that report failed Get requests in fproxy and allow
users to retry (with possibly another HTL) include the url-encoded key
in their ACTION attribute. Unfortunately java.net.URLEncoder encodes
"/" which is wrong at least in this context[1]
The backoff wasn't being reset correctly. I just commited a fix. People
should update.
--gj
--
Freesites
(0.3) freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//
(0.4) freenet:SSK at npfV5XQijFkF6sXZvuO0o~kG4wEPAgM/homepage//
___
Devl ma
> I am getting this exception while trying to view a Freesite, it looks
> like a bug in the FProxy filtering code:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Vector: method
> add(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z not found
That would be a 1.2ism.
___
Devl mailing
> I am getting this exception while trying to view a Freesite, it looks
> like a bug in the FProxy filtering code:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Vector: method
> add(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z not found
That would be a 1.2ism.
___
Devl mailing
I am getting this exception while trying to view a Freesite, it looks
like a bug in the FProxy filtering code:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Vector: method
add(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z not found
at
Freenet.contrib.fproxy.filter.FilterAnalysis.addDisallowedElement(FilterAnalysis.java:4
I am getting this exception while trying to view a Freesite, it looks
like a bug in the FProxy filtering code:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.Vector: method
add(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z not found
at
Freenet.contrib.fproxy.filter.FilterAnalysis.addDisallowedElement(FilterAnalysis.java:
From: "Sebastian Sp?th"
> They are explicitely deleted. But they seem to be locked (although they
> shouldn't be) by the the OS, so that any delete command fails.
Maybe they haven't been close()d? (Forgive me if this is a stupid and
unnecessary hint...)
-Stefan
___
Dave Hooper schrieb:
> 1.Create a temporary file
> 2.When we don't need the temporary file, delete it
>
> ? I apologise for my utter ignorance of the java code. However if no JREs
> on Windows automatically delete temporary files then it sounds to me more
> like there is a non-cross-plat
On Monday 11 June 2001 09:06, you wrote:
> From: "Sebastian Sp?th"
>
> > They are explicitely deleted. But they seem to be locked (although they
> > shouldn't be) by the the OS, so that any delete command fails.
>
> Maybe they haven't been close()d? (Forgive me if this is a stupid and
> unnecessar
On Monday 11 June 2001 09:06, you wrote:
> From: "Sebastian Späth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > They are explicitely deleted. But they seem to be locked (although they
> > shouldn't be) by the the OS, so that any delete command fails.
>
> Maybe they haven't been close()d? (Forgive me if this is a stu
From: "Sebastian Späth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They are explicitely deleted. But they seem to be locked (although they
> shouldn't be) by the the OS, so that any delete command fails.
Maybe they haven't been close()d? (Forgive me if this is a stupid and
unnecessary hint...)
-Stefan
___
Dave Hooper schrieb:
> 1.Create a temporary file
> 2.When we don't need the temporary file, delete it
>
> ? I apologise for my utter ignorance of the java code. However if no JREs
> on Windows automatically delete temporary files then it sounds to me more
> like there is a non-cross-pla
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 05:34:33PM -0400, eigenman wrote:
> Is it at least possible to give freenet its OWN temp directory??
>
> This would at least not crash my system when it fills up with large insert
> files.
>
> The temp files occur on inserts. Not sure if they are Java temp files or
> free
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 05:34:33PM -0400, eigenman wrote:
> Is it at least possible to give freenet its OWN temp directory??
>
> This would at least not crash my system when it fills up with large insert
> files.
>
> The temp files occur on inserts. Not sure if they are Java temp files or
> fre
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:34:19PM -0400, eigenman wrote:
> >
> > We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
> > in 1.2+, so we don't use them. The files in the store are being removed in
> > their destructor, so if they are not going away either the destructor is
>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:29:41PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> Hang on a second.
> How are the temporary files being created?
> How come it isn't freenet's _responsibility_ to do something along the lines
> of:
We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
in 1.2+, so
Hang on a second.
How are the temporary files being created?
How come it isn't freenet's _responsibility_ to do something along the lines
of:
1.Create a temporary file
2.When we don't need the temporary file, delete it
? I apologise for my utter ignorance of the java code. However if no
>
> We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
> in 1.2+, so we don't use them. The files in the store are being removed in
> their destructor, so if they are not going away either the destructor is
> not being called or the JVMs are not obeying delete calls on files
Is it at least possible to give freenet its OWN temp directory??
This would at least not crash my system when it fills up with large insert
files.
The temp files occur on inserts. Not sure if they are Java temp files or
freenet temp files.
I think there must be a nice solution here.
Jay Ferguso
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hooper"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp files
> Hang on a second.
> How are the temporary files being created?
> How come it isn't freenet's _responsibility_ to
When bugs are in third-party code beyond one's control, sometimes the bug is
best fixed by altering the doco.
Users need to be told about this problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Mathew Ryden"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 15:33
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - no
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:34:19PM -0400, eigenman wrote:
> >
> > We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
> > in 1.2+, so we don't use them. The files in the store are being removed in
> > their destructor, so if they are not going away either the destructor is
>
>
> We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
> in 1.2+, so we don't use them. The files in the store are being removed in
> their destructor, so if they are not going away either the destructor is
> not being called or the JVMs are not obeying delete calls on file
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:29:41PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> Hang on a second.
> How are the temporary files being created?
> How come it isn't freenet's _responsibility_ to do something along the lines
> of:
We do remove all files explicitely. Java has built in temp files, but only
in 1.2+, s
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp files
> Hang on a second.
> How are the temporary files being created?
&
Is it at least possible to give freenet its OWN temp directory??
This would at least not crash my system when it fills up with large insert
files.
The temp files occur on inserts. Not sure if they are Java temp files or
freenet temp files.
I think there must be a nice solution here.
Jay Fergus
Hang on a second.
How are the temporary files being created?
How come it isn't freenet's _responsibility_ to do something along the lines
of:
1.Create a temporary file
2.When we don't need the temporary file, delete it
? I apologise for my utter ignorance of the java code. However if n
Jay on the FreeWeb project has informed me that Freenet is not cleaning up
its temporary files.
I don't know if the problem is the same on Linux/Mac versions, but on
Windows, this can definitely be regarded as a bug.
On Windows, a growing bulk of uncleared temporary files causes chronic
system pr
Then the people need to be informed. Perhaps there is an alternative JVM out
there...
- Original Message -
From: "eigenman"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp files
>
>
> > When bugs are in third-p
Then the people need to be informed. Perhaps there is an alternative JVM out
there...
- Original Message -
From: "eigenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp fil
st will simply uninstall freenet rather than deal with the problem.
IMHO
Jay Ferguspn
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mathew Ryden"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 15:33
> Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp files
>
>
> &g
- Original Message -
From: "David McNab"
> Jay on the FreeWeb project has informed me that Freenet is not cleaning up
> its temporary files.
>
> I don't know if the problem is the same on Linux/Mac versions, but on
> Windows, this can definitely be regarded as a bug.
It is a bug. Too bad
st will simply uninstall freenet rather than deal with the problem.
IMHO
Jay Ferguspn
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 15:33
> Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug -
06, 2001 15:33
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug - not clearing temp files
> - Original Message -
> From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Jay on the FreeWeb project has informed me that Freenet is not cleaning
up
> > its temporary files.
> >
- Original Message -
From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jay on the FreeWeb project has informed me that Freenet is not cleaning up
> its temporary files.
>
> I don't know if the problem is the same on Linux/Mac versions, but on
> Windows, this can definitely be regarded as a bug.
Jay on the FreeWeb project has informed me that Freenet is not cleaning up
its temporary files.
I don't know if the problem is the same on Linux/Mac versions, but on
Windows, this can definitely be regarded as a bug.
On Windows, a growing bulk of uncleared temporary files causes chronic
system p
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Clarke"
>
> > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > > Actually it was a def
diaone.net (8.11.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
f4D0TPt26923
for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 20:29:25 -0400
From: "Mark J. Roberts"
X-X-Sender:
To:
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug (??) - MSK access from RequestClient
In-Reply-To: <008a01c0db49$cc660ef0$ba7e36d2 at private>
Message-ID:
MI
From: "Ian Clarke"
>> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns
a
>> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> > the size of the data.
>
> ...or maybe not...
The size in question is actually the size of the file about to
-
From: "David McNab"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> > Be a sport and publish an example of the keypair that works please..
> > I think I know what the problem is.
>
> Here'
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> the size of the data.
...or maybe not...
Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:10:40PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> The problem is that 0.3 also has the size (i guess). That means that a call
> to GenerateSVKKeypair would have to take in a file so it would know the size
> and encode that in correctly. It's impossible to do it in this method
> cleanl
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> > the size of the data.
>
> ...or maybe not...
The size in question is actually the size
uDT8iApCWc33MlNClfiMlIRHZOkQAgE
- Original Message -
From: "Tavin Cole"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> the size of the data.
...or maybe not...
Ian.
PGP signature
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:10:40PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> The problem is that 0.3 also has the size (i guess). That means that a call
> to GenerateSVKKeypair would have to take in a file so it would know the size
> and encode that in correctly. It's impossible to do it in this method
> clean
Hi all,
While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
with FCP.
Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated keypair (which
fails), versus a hardwired keypair previously generated by Insert
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair
returns a
> > keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This
was
> > not accidental, althoug
On Sun, 13 May 2001, David McNab wrote:
> I only query this because I've been told that the 'MSK@' is redundant, and
> that '//' is sufficient.
MSK@ is mandatory until Fred is updated for the standard. Then MSK@ will
be rejected.
--
"...it must be held that third-party electronic monitoring, s
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair
returns a
> > keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This
was
> > not
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
On Sun, 13 May 2001, David McNab wrote:
> I only query this because I've been told that the 'MSK@' is redundant, and
> that '//' is sufficient.
MSK@ is mandatory until Fred is updated for the standard. Then MSK@ will
be rejected.
--
"...it must be held that third-party electronic monitoring,
Hi,
I don't know if this is a bug, or just me not understanding the correct way
of doing things.
I inserted a test site with just one file, index.html
I've retrieved the mapfile metadata, scutinised it in a hex editor, and find
it to be valid.
'SSK@/-path' retrieves the mapfile - OK
'MSK@SSK@/
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns
a
>> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
>> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is
returned.
>So the question is whe
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
> with FCP.
>
> Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
>
> I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated key
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns a
> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is returned.
So th
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
> 1) Use the FCP 'GenerateSVKKeypair' command, and save the private key
> 2) Use the 'ClientPut' command to insert anything as
> SSK at privatekey/anything. Perhaps use htl=1 to make it quick.
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns a
> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is returned.
So t
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wr
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
> 1) Use the FCP 'GenerateSVKKeypair' command, and save the private key
> 2) Use the 'ClientPut' command to insert anything as
> SSK@privatekey/anything. Perhaps use htl=1 to make it quick.
>
--
From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> > Be a sport and publish an example of the keypair that works please..
> > I think
uDT8iApCWc33MlNClfiMlIRHZOkQAgE
- Original Message -
From: "Tavin Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200,
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
> with FCP.
>
> Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
>
> I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated ke
I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
request any other websites either).
This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
Freenet.ConnectFailedException: Freenet.ConnectException:
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
> "IC" == Ian Clarke writes:
IC> I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't
successfully
> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IC> I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
IC> request any other websites either).
IC> This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
IC> Freenet.ConnectFailed
I get the following when trying to request GJ's website (and can't successfully
request any other websites either).
This is from hawk.freenetproject.org, a Debian box, using IBM's 1.3 JDK.
Freenet.ConnectFailedException: Freenet.ConnectException:
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 20:30, cardhore wrote:
> Doing:
>
> freenet_request -autoRedirect no
> MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
freenet_request -autoRedirect no
SSK at enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage
will grab the MSK map file if that's what you are trying to d
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, cardhore wrote:
> freenet_request -autoRedirect no
> MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
[snip]
> This happens only with the redirect set to no.
That will confuse it. Fred's mapfile code is a nasty hack. It sucks. It
doesn't report errors reasonably. Sorry.
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 20:30, cardhore wrote:
> Doing:
>
> freenet_request -autoRedirect no
> MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
freenet_request -autoRedirect no
SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage
will grab the MSK map file if that's what you are trying to do. R
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, cardhore wrote:
> freenet_request -autoRedirect no
> MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
[snip]
> This happens only with the redirect set to no.
That will confuse it. Fred's mapfile code is a nasty hack. It sucks. It
doesn't report errors reasonably. Sorry.
> "MJR" == Mark J Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MJR> That will confuse it. Fred's mapfile code is a nasty hack. It
MJR> sucks. It doesn't report errors reasonably. Sorry.
It's also pretty much enabled the current rash of "Freesites." A
hearty beaujolais to the fellow who creat
> "MJR" == Mark J Roberts writes:
MJR> That will confuse it. Fred's mapfile code is a nasty hack. It
MJR> sucks. It doesn't report errors reasonably. Sorry.
It's also pretty much enabled the current rash of "Freesites." A
hearty beaujolais to the fellow who created and implemented M
Doing:
freenet_request -autoRedirect no
MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
Results in:
Freenet Core running on 2116 (build 390)
Freenet Core running on 2117 (build 390)
State "PREPARED" reached.
State "REQUESTING" reached.
A message was sent to tcp/127.0.0.1:19114.
A message
Doing:
freenet_request -autoRedirect no
MSK@SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpK Mftf6QQAgE/homepage//
Results in:
Freenet Core running on 2116 (build 390)
Freenet Core running on 2117 (build 390)
State "PREPARED" reached.
State "REQUESTING" reached.
A message was sent to tcp/127.0.0.1:19114.
A message w
> "SR" == Stefan Reich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SR> Isn't 0.3.8.2 imminent? Put it in there.
Yeah, it should be coming out within 24 hours.
~Mr. Bad
--
~
Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.o
added to
freegle... *g*
-Stefan
- Original Message -
From: "Brandon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug in -keyIndex exposes private key
>
>
> BTW, for those using the current release, y
> This one's no kidding: When you use finsert -keyIndex with an SSK key, the _private_
>key is inserted into the index!
Thanks for pointing this out. It's fixed now. I suggest we do a new
release as soon as possible as people are starting to use the key index
code to submit keys to sites and th
This one's no kidding: When you use finsert -keyIndex with an SSK key, the
_private_ key is inserted into the index!
For example (condensed protocol):
finsert -makeKeyPair
[...]
Private key : Tr0F1Aefe4o8tHFFTxIRgXyT4g
Public key : Umt-34s5Y16lZN6VbqO08ViWWd0QAgE
finsert -keyIndex freegletest
This one's no kidding: When you use
finsert -keyIndex with an SSK key, the _private_ key is inserted into the
index!
For example (condensed
protocol):
finsert -makeKeyPair
[...]Private key : Tr0F1Aefe4o8tHFFTxIRgXyT4gPublic key :
Umt-34s5Y16lZN6VbqO08ViWWd0QAgE
finsert -keyIndex fre
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 01:52:38PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> > Tell you what. I'm going to go hack NullBucket right now so that it returns
> > a NullInputStream that always gives EOF, instead of a null pointer.
>
> I see that you've committed changes to NullBucket. However, the stack
> trace per
> Tell you what. I'm going to go hack NullBucket right now so that it returns
> a NullInputStream that always gives EOF, instead of a null pointer.
I see that you've committed changes to NullBucket. However, the stack
trace persists.
___
Devl mailin
> Hey, so, I'd really like to start tracking bugs on SourceForge. Yes,
> some people don't want to use it, and I'd be happy to personally
> "marshall" bugs by hand across the boundary from bug-tracking system
> to email or whatever.
>
> Can one of the admins give me permissions to admin the bugs
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:30:41PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 03:16:13AM +0100, toad wrote:
> > > Actually, this was unrelated to the restructuring. It's a result of my
> > > fixing
> > > Fred to compute the encryption key for CHKs from the whole data stream
> > > instead
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:30:41PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 03:16:13AM +0100, toad wrote:
> > > > Actually, this was unrelated to the restructuring. It's a result of my
> > > > fixing
> > > > Fred to com
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 05:30:44AM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> > The work around is to just create a new empty FileBucket and pass that in.
>
> I've replaced all NullBuckets in my code with FileBuckets. I get the same
> stack trace. Any other suggestions?
Gar. I know this is obnoxious, but I think y
> The work around is to just create a new empty FileBucket and pass that in.
I've replaced all NullBuckets in my code with FileBuckets. I get the same
stack trace. Any other suggestions?
___
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.f
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 08:39:48PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:20:01PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> > There's some bug in the new Client restructuring as it has broken by
> > code. It's also possible that it was broken before and changing my code
> > has just revealed its broke
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 03:16:13AM +0100, toad wrote:
> > Actually, this was unrelated to the restructuring. It's a result of my
> > fixing
> > Fred to compute the encryption key for CHKs from the whole data stream
> > instead
> > of the non-metadata part only. You'll get this if you attempt to
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:20:01PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
> There's some bug in the new Client restructuring as it has broken by
> code. It's also possible that it was broken before and changing my code
> has just revealed its brokenness. However, since the stack trace
> penetrates into FNPClient an
There's some bug in the new Client restructuring as it has broken by
code. It's also possible that it was broken before and changing my code
has just revealed its brokenness. However, since the stack trace
penetrates into FNPClient and I haven't changed
SimplifiedClient.dumpBuckets() lately, I thi
Hey, so, I'd really like to start tracking bugs on SourceForge. Yes,
some people don't want to use it, and I'd be happy to personally
"marshall" bugs by hand across the boundary from bug-tracking system
to email or whatever.
Can one of the admins give me permissions to admin the bugs database?
~M
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
