Stopped & restarted freenet node (Windows). Now it
won't start, and it flashes the bunny rabbit with the
line through.
Seems like the routing table got corrupt. I had
rtMaxNodes and rtMaxRefs each set to 9, however.
Jan 22, 2002 7:56:45 PM
(freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore, main): I/
Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:46:19PM -0500, Jack Duggan wrote:
>
>>I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
>>always give the latest snapshot.
>>
>>Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
>>freenet-webinstall.ex
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:23:51AM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Tough, because the web-installer is supposed to be able to update
> existing installations. I honestly have no clue how I could detect the
> case of an "old-type" installation and delete it only in this case.
Look for a .store d
I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
always give the latest snapshot.
Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
freenet-webinstall.exe. Now, I cannot even get the GATEWAY to open, once
Freenet is started, and Frost will no lo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:46:19PM -0500, Jack Duggan wrote:
>
> I just downloaded and istalled freenet-webinstall.exe which is supposed to
> always give the latest snapshot.
>
> Everything was going fine with Freenet and with Frost until I activated
> freenet-webinstall.exe. Now, I cannot eve
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Clarke"
>
> > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > > Actually it was a def
From: "Ian Clarke"
>> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns
a
>> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> > the size of the data.
>
> ...or maybe not...
The size in question is actually the size of the file about to
-
From: "David McNab"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> > Be a sport and publish an example of the keypair that works please..
> > I think I know what the problem is.
>
> Here'
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> the size of the data.
...or maybe not...
Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:10:40PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> The problem is that 0.3 also has the size (i guess). That means that a call
> to GenerateSVKKeypair would have to take in a file so it would know the size
> and encode that in correctly. It's impossible to do it in this method
> cleanl
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> > the size of the data.
>
> ...or maybe not...
The size in question is actually the size
uDT8iApCWc33MlNClfiMlIRHZOkQAgE
- Original Message -
From: "Tavin Cole"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:07:58AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I suspect that the size in question is the size of the key rather than
> the size of the data.
...or maybe not...
Ian.
PGP signature
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:10:40PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> The problem is that 0.3 also has the size (i guess). That means that a call
> to GenerateSVKKeypair would have to take in a file so it would know the size
> and encode that in correctly. It's impossible to do it in this method
> clean
Hi all,
While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
with FCP.
Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated keypair (which
fails), versus a hardwired keypair previously generated by Insert
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair
returns a
> > keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This
was
> > not accidental, althoug
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> > Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair
returns a
> > keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This
was
> > not
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> > To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns
a
>> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
>> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is
returned.
>So the question is whe
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
> with FCP.
>
> Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
>
> I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated key
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns a
> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is returned.
So th
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
> 1) Use the FCP 'GenerateSVKKeypair' command, and save the private key
> 2) Use the 'ClientPut' command to insert anything as
> SSK at privatekey/anything. Perhaps use htl=1 to make it quick.
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 06:44:11PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
> Actually it was a deficiency in the FCP specs. GenerateSVKKeypair returns a
> keypair without the last three bytes -- the keysize and keytype. This was
> not accidental, although the docs are lacking in what exactly is returned.
So t
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wr
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:58:29AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> To get a working Freenet keypair with FCP,
> 1) Use the FCP 'GenerateSVKKeypair' command, and save the private key
> 2) Use the 'ClientPut' command to insert anything as
> SSK@privatekey/anything. Perhaps use htl=1 to make it quick.
>
--
From: "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> > Be a sport and publish an example of the keypair that works please..
> > I think
uDT8iApCWc33MlNClfiMlIRHZOkQAgE
- Original Message -
From: "Tavin Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Bug Report - 0.3.9.1 - FCP generates bad keypair
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200,
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:53:22AM +1200, David McNab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I like the overall improvements with v0.3.9.1, I'm having a problem
> with FCP.
>
> Basically, the FCP 'GenerateSVKPair' command creates dud keys (ie .
>
> I've verified this in my code by using an FCP-generated ke
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Anderson wrote:
>
> I started running a win98 node from the stable branch. I've successfully
> inserted and requested several relatively large files (26mb). One weird
> thing I've noticed is that inserts run at around 590k/s and requests
> only get 40k/s from my linux
I started running a win98 node from the stable branch. I've successfully
inserted and requested several relatively large files (26mb). One weird
thing I've noticed is that inserts run at around 590k/s and requests
only get 40k/s from my linux boxen (100mbit net). Inserts nearly peg
the win98 cp
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Anderson wrote:
> requests were all truncated below 64K
The 64K number is special because that is the size of the Buffer that is
placed on top of the CipherStreams. So, one buffer dumps and the next
read from disk fails.
__
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2001, Steven Hazel wrote:
>
> > When trying to insert a 115557 byte file (pir8z.gif), InsertClient
> > gives me this:
>
> I can't reproduce this with the pir8z.gif from thalassocracy.org,
> although that file looks to be (du -bs) 116736 byt
On 28 Feb 2001 18:36:31 -0600, Steven Hazel wrote:
> "Mark J. Roberts" writes:
>
> > I can't reproduce this with the pir8z.gif from thalassocracy.org,
> > although that file looks to be (du -bs) 116736 bytes. (Latest CVS here.)
>
> I've you've managed to insert a file of at least that size, try
"Mark J. Roberts" writes:
> I can't reproduce this with the pir8z.gif from thalassocracy.org,
> although that file looks to be (du -bs) 116736 bytes. (Latest CVS here.)
I've you've managed to insert a file of at least that size, try
requesting several times. It looks like the node is occasional
On 28 Feb 2001, Steven Hazel wrote:
> When trying to insert a 115557 byte file (pir8z.gif), InsertClient
> gives me this:
I can't reproduce this with the pir8z.gif from thalassocracy.org,
although that file looks to be (du -bs) 116736 bytes. (Latest CVS here.)
What Java are you using? "java -ver
When trying to insert a 115557 byte file (pir8z.gif), InsertClient
gives me this:
65519 bytes read.
java.io.IOException: Success
at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:83)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java)
at java.
38 matches
Mail list logo
