On Sunday 18 May 2008 05:27, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include
db4o,
and use it for our various
On Sunday 18 May 2008 19:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
I've got to say, I really hope Perst employ better software engineers
than their web designers, because their website is awful. It somewhat
shakes my confidence in them. I know this seems like a very
superficial judgement, but if they put little
On Monday 19 May 2008 11:34, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Sunday 18 May 2008 19:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
Looking at the manual, it looks like Perst operates at a lower level
than db4o - you need to manually create and maintain indexes. This is
closer to the Java collections API, which could
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include
db4o,
and use it for our
I know I repeat myself, but if you consider db4o you should also
consider perst as an option.
Toad, can you do your 'disk full test' with perst to compare it against db4o?
Perst and db4o seem to provide the same things. But according to
http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/perstbench.html
perst is much
I've got to say, I really hope Perst employ better software engineers
than their web designers, because their website is awful. It somewhat
shakes my confidence in them. I know this seems like a very
superficial judgement, but if they put little care into the public
face of their software, it is
On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include
db4o,
Yay.
Of
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian and I have
On Saturday 17 May 2008 14:07, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew
On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include
db4o,
and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the
conclusion that while we can do most of what we need to do with simple
flatfile
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include
db4o,
and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the
conclusion that while
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o,
and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the
conclusion that while we can do most of what we need to do with simple
12 matches
Mail list logo
