Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:41 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> In the current version of devscripts in wheezy, when invoking dch --bpo,
> generates a changelog like this one:
> devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
>
> It should of course use this inst
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:41 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > In the current version of devscripts in wheezy, when invoking dch --bpo,
> > generates a changelog like this one:
> > devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
>
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 01:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 10:43 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Have you asked the devscripts maintainers? That's not the sort of change
> > I'd personally be happy with unless the maintainers had signed it off.
>
> These days, it seems that devscripts
On 04/01/2013 10:43 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Have you asked the devscripts maintainers? That's not the sort of change
> I'd personally be happy with unless the maintainers had signed it off.
These days, it seems that devscripts is maintained collectively by a lot
of people. There is 11 persons
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 01:21:58 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Anyway, I don't think this is very critical. If you would like to forget
> about this until the release, and focus on more important things, I'm ok
> with that.
>
Let's do that then.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Hi,
On Montag, 1. April 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> In the current version of devscripts in wheezy, when invoking dch --bpo,
> generates a changelog like this one:
> devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
>
> It should of course use this instead:
> devscripts (2.12.6~bpo70+1
On 05/17/2013 09:09 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 1. April 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> In the current version of devscripts in wheezy, when invoking dch --bpo,
>> generates a changelog like this one:
>> devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
>>
>> It should o
Hi Thomas,
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As much as I can tell, this has been fixed in current Wheezy.
are you sure? Because wheezy today has the same version (2.12.7) as it had
when you filed 704442 :-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> are you sure? Because wheezy today has the same version (2.12.7) as it had
> when you filed 704442 :-)
2.12.6 obviously. (sorry for the noise)
___
devscripts-devel mailing list
devscripts-devel@lists.alio
On 05/18/2013 04:31 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> As much as I can tell, this has been fixed in current Wheezy.
>
> are you sure? Because wheezy today has the same version (2.12.7) as it had
> when you filed 704442 :-)
>
>
> cheers
Hi,
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> #704442 was closed because Wheezy wasn't released yet, now that it has been
> released, what's the opinion of having "dch --bpo" to default wo wheezy?
ping?!?
dch --bpo - s#squeeze#wheezy#g s#bpo60#bpo70# is not as comfortable as I'd
like it
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:17:48 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > #704442 was closed because Wheezy wasn't released yet, now that it has been
> > released, what's the opinion of having "dch --bpo" to default wo wheezy?
>
> ping?!?
>
> dch
12 matches
Mail list logo
