I've been lurking this listserver for ages, and have not only appreciated
those who spend so much of their time helping others, but appreciated the
patience and kindness that I associate with the people here. A little sad and
surprised to see this type of thing. Get back to what you all do be
I'm done with this thread. If you want to bash me, proceed with vigor.
It's unhealthy to hold in aggression.
Actually, if anyone wants to bash Taran or anyone else, take it
off-list. I'm all for a vigorous debate about open source and
proprietary software, but I won't allow it to be an excus
Michael F. Pitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taran,
> Do not try to obscure the issue of the vulnerabilities language you used.
> What you should say in a few words, rather than a lengthy treatise, is that
> you misspoke.
> And we can leave it at that.
>
> Mike
Mike,
what Taran wrote is cor
There's another level on which I read this short piece - that of different
Office systems/suites. Having opted to try OpenOffice (OOo) instead of
purchasing MS Office for a laptop several months ago I have to say that
as nice
as it performs generally there are bugs - I find it crashes a lot whe
>
> Mike
>
> Michael F. Pitsch
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave A.
> Chakrabarti
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:20 AM
> To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
I just had a 'Healthy Choice' 'Premium Fudge Bar' reading this. It
tasted really good.
Executive Director wrote:
Taran,
Do not try to obscure the issue of the vulnerabilities language you used.
What you should say in a few words, rather than a lengthy treatise, is that
you misspoke.
I would
What fascinates more than anything else in the ongoing Linux -v- Windows
debate is the importance placed on potential code exploits over and above
anything and everything else of consideration... User preference,
suitability of purpose, sustainability and supportability, interactivity
with existing
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claude Almansi
(BW)
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:25 PM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Executive Director wrote:
> " That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in relea
ay 23, 2006 11:41 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Opinions need to be supported to have any value. When you set personal
> bias aside, facts are a simple google aw
D]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave A.
Chakrabarti
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:20 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Mike,
I find this ha
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taran Rampersad
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:47 AM
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Executive Director wrote:
> " That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in
Executive Director wrote:
" That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in releasing anything soon, and I
certainly hope that whatever they release doesn't permit the continued
plague of flaws and vulnerabilities that the general population of the world
has become familiar with. "
I want you to rerea
Executive Director wrote:
" That said, I do wish Microsoft luck in releasing anything soon, and I
certainly hope that whatever they release doesn't permit the continued
plague of flaws and vulnerabilities that the general population of the world
has become familiar with. "
This opinion of course
>
> Michael F. Pitsch
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taran Rampersad
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:26 PM
> To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
> Subject: Re: [DDN] Micro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Opinions need to be supported to have any value. When you set personal bias
> aside, facts are a simple google away.
Indeed. The author of this letter did not include the entire sub-title of the
article:
"US-CERT found more vulnerabilities in Linux and Unix systems tha
discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
Fouad Riaz Bajwa wrote:
> Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
> View the complete story at:
> http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependab
Fouad Riaz Bajwa wrote:
Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
View the complete story at:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependable/2100-73
44_3-6074237.html?tag=nefd.pulse
A senior Microsoft executive told a BBC documentary that people should use
comm
Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
View the complete story at:
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+Open+source+not+reliable+or+dependable/2100-73
44_3-6074237.html?tag=nefd.pulse
A senior Microsoft executive told a BBC documentary that people should use
commercial software if they're
18 matches
Mail list logo
