MAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message Follows
From: "Don Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Digital Divide Network discussion
group<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Digital Divide Network discussion
group'"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [DDN
> > I administer a mail gateway processing upwards of 7,000 messages per
> > day, and unabashedly can confirm we trash more than 4,000 of these
> > per day unread and without providing notifications as to why. This
> > is common practice throughout Government, corporate's and business,
> > the a
Norbert writes:
> Can anyone suggest a good quotable reference for the fact that
> this kind of thing is common practice?
Norbert unfortunately information in this area isn't so easily forthcoming
because of security and proprietary concerns - Organisations that filter
email content tend not to a
Don Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I administer a mail gateway processing upwards of 7,000 messages per day,
> and unabashedly can confirm we trash more than 4,000 of these per day unread
> and without providing notifications as to why. This is common practice
> throughout Government, corpor
> Maybe of interest to find out more about the pros and cons and what
> will be the result of this if implemented:
+1 - At the moment it's sheer conjecture to assume this will increase or
decrease the amount of mail successfully delivered to a recipients mailbox,
or the amount of Spam we receive
Maybe of interest to find out more about the pros and cons and what
will be the result of this if implemented:
---
"Email -- Should the Sender Pay?"
EFF Fundraiser, Debate Between Esther Dyson and Danny O'Brien
In light of AOL's adopting a "certified" email system, EFF is hosting
a debate o
I received an email today from the EFF that really brought home to me
how urgent this net neutrality debate really is. If you're like me,
you've been thinking that it's important, but haven't really understood
how or what you can do about it, or why it's so urgent...everything
seems to be playe
