Christopher Wright Wrote:
> jerry quinn wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but I'm having trouble seeing that a
> > simple declaration will parse correctly with the D grammar.
> >
> > If we take a declaration statment like:
> >
> > int x = 3;
> >
> > we have (
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> I'm almost done rewriting the regular expression engine, and some pretty
> interesting things have transpired.
>
> First, I separated the engine into two parts, one that is the actual regular
> expression engine, and the other that is t
I'm almost done rewriting the regular expression engine, and some pretty
interesting things have transpired.
First, I separated the engine into two parts, one that is the actual
regular expression engine, and the other that is the state of the match
with some particular input. The previous cod
Benji Smith wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This all would make perfect sense if the performance was about the
same in the two cases. But in fact memory mapping introduced a large
*pessimization*. Why? I am supposedly copying less data and doing less
Pessimization? What a great word! I've
Walter Bright Wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
> > Apparently, setting an array length to -1 will cause this issue. It's
> > unfortunate to not have a stack trace in the error output, or a functional
> > gdb to capture it! I really hope gdb compatiblity will be fixed :(
>
> What's wrong with gdb?
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
This all would make perfect sense if the performance was about the same
in the two cases. But in fact memory mapping introduced a large
*pessimization*. Why? I am supposedly copying less data and doing less
Pessimization? What a great word! I've never heard that bef
jerry quinn wrote:
Hi there,
I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but I'm having trouble seeing that a
simple declaration will parse correctly with the D grammar.
If we take a declaration statment like:
int x = 3;
we have (my best guess):
DeclarationStatement -> Declaration
Declaration ->
Does anybody know when core.sync will be part of the druntime release with
D2? It's been in the druntime source for a month. I thought it'd be in the
latest release (2.025), but I don't see it :(
Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Benji Smith wrote:
Benji Smith wrote:
Maybe a NumericInterval struct would be a good idea. It could be
specialized to any numeric type (float, double, int, etc), it would
know its own boundaries, and it'd keep track of whether those
boundaries were open
Hi there,
I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but I'm having trouble seeing that a
simple declaration will parse correctly with the D grammar.
If we take a declaration statment like:
int x = 3;
we have (my best guess):
DeclarationStatement -> Declaration
Declaration -> Decl
Decl -> BasicTy
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:08 AM, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello Nick,
>
>> "John Reimer" wrote in message
>> news:28b70f8c1460c8cb5f4c18ef2...@news.digitalmars.com...
>>
>>> So what we have here is a society where people are becoming so used
>>> to hearing and saying expletives and profanity that th
Hello Nick,
"John Reimer" wrote in message
news:28b70f8c1460c8cb5f4c18ef2...@news.digitalmars.com...
So what we have here is a society where people are becoming so used
to hearing and saying expletives and profanity that they no longer
think of their meaning, even though these words retain th
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Nice advice on madvise, didn't know about it. Just in case it might be
useful to someone, trying madvise with any of the four possible policies
did not yield any noticeable change in timing for my particular test.
If you can build 4 windows executables, I can time th
Jason House wrote:
Apparently, setting an array length to -1 will cause this issue. It's
unfortunate to not have a stack trace in the error output, or a functional
gdb to capture it! I really hope gdb compatiblity will be fixed :(
What's wrong with gdb?
Brad Roberts wrote:
bearophile wrote:
>> What the heck is going on? When does memory mapping actually help?<
You are scanning the file linearly, and the memory window you use is
probably very small. In such situation a memory mapping is probably
not the best thing. A memory mapping is useful wh
Daniel Keep wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
One problem here is static constructors. They're supposed to run in
import order, I believe, so if you do this:
module A;
Object o;
static this () { o = new Object; }
module B;
import A;
static this () { writeln(o); }
That should be safe. I think.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
I'm quite unhappy with the API of std.regexp. It's a chaotic design
that
provides a hodgepodge of functionality and tries to
"John Reimer" wrote in message
news:28b70f8c1460c8cb5f4c18ef2...@news.digitalmars.com...
>
> So what we have here is a society where people are becoming so used to
> hearing and saying expletives and profanity that they no longer think of
> their meaning, even though these words retain their me
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
I'm quite unhappy with the API of std.regexp. It's a chaotic design
that
provides a hodgepodge of functionality and tries to
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
> Brad Roberts wrote:
> > bearophile wrote:
> > >> What the heck is going on? When does memory mapping actually help?<
> >> You are scanning the file linearly, and the memory window you use is
> >> probably very small. In
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
The problem I have with the stigma on swearing is that people who find these
words objectionable tend to replace them with other words that aren't so
objectionable in order to get the same intent across
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
news:mailman.783.1234919397.22690.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Unless of course you use those same words to express your dismay at
today's lunch options. Then you've robbed those word
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:43:06 +, John Reimer wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
>> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:01:49 +, John Reimer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Steve,
>>>
This is the same kind of attitude, John, that brought about the death
of Alan Turing.
>>> That's a strong accusation, Steve,
Christopher Wright wrote:
> One problem here is static constructors. They're supposed to run in
> import order, I believe, so if you do this:
>
> module A;
> Object o;
> static this () { o = new Object; }
>
> module B;
> import A;
> static this () { writeln(o); }
>
> That should be safe. I thi
Christopher Wright wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Christopher Wright" wrote in message
news:gnfgj6$148...@digitalmars.com...
One possible change: implicit casting with an assertion that the
nullable value is not null.
I can tell right now I wouldn't like that. That would make it far too
eas
John Reimer:
> Yes, the mode was completely indelicate however disturbed I was at the time.
> I am not at all satisfied with how I carried that one out.
Relax, I have a thick pelt. Learn from your errors, and be better next times.
Bye,
bearophile
May be mm scheme results in more calls to HDD?
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Alexander Pánek
wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Daniel de Kok wrote:
Shouldn't we talk about D or (Belgian) beer here? :^)
There are no parens about it. It's either Belgian or it's not beer.
28 matches
Mail list logo
