Michel Fortin, el 20 de abril a las 18:53 me escribiste:
> On 2009-04-20 18:31:28 -0400, Sean Kelly said:
>
> >Yeah. The unfortunate tradeoff is that finalizers are run while all these
> >app threads are suspended, and if these finalizers enter a synchronized
> >block they're likely to deadlock.
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-04-20 07:25:43 -0400, Christopher Wright said:
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
The utility is when you are looking for methods to invoke via runtime
reflection, you can determine that a given function is one of these
runtime opDotExp equivalents.
So it is being
Sean Kelly wrote:
> == Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
>> Sean Kelly Wrote:
>>> You're guaranteed that the GC will notify you when it finalizes
>>> the referenced object, so you shouldn't have to query the GC
>>> at all. Just copy the reference into a GC-scannable
On 2009-04-20 18:31:28 -0400, Sean Kelly said:
Yeah. The unfortunate tradeoff is that finalizers are run while all these
app threads are suspended, and if these finalizers enter a synchronized
block they're likely to deadlock. This happened enough with the Phobos
GC that I was motivated to ma
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> >
> > > The horrible thing about all this is it makes using a multithreaded
> > > WeakRef horribly slow. �Even if the GC facility were provided fo
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> >
> > The horrible thing about all this is it makes using a multithreaded
> > WeakRef horribly slow. Even if the GC facility were provided for
> > what you want to do you're talking about acquiring a mutex in
>
Jason House, el 20 de abril a las 17:45 me escribiste:
> As a side note, does druntime use multiple threads for the garbage
> collector?
No, but I'm planning to add concurrency support to the GC. D1 and Posix
OSs, though. Porting to D2 should be fairly easy because I'll use Tango's
GC as base, whi
Lars,
I would be happy for you to take a look at it. If you will send me a private
e-mail to this address, I'll get my package to you.
JC
Lars Kyllingstad Wrote:
> JC wrote:
> > I do a lot of linear work with economic models in D at work. For this
> > reason I created small matrix and vector pa
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>
> > The horrible thing about all this is it makes using a multithreaded
> > WeakRef horribly slow. Even if the GC facility were provided for
> > what you want to do you're talking about acquiring a mutex in
> > th
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> == Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> > Sean Kelly Wrote:
> > >
> > > You're guaranteed that the GC will notify you when it finalizes
> > > the referenced object, so you shouldn't have to query the GC
> > > at all. Just copy the reference into a G
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> > The horrible thing about all this is it makes using a multithreaded
> > WeakRef horribly slow. Even if the GC facility were provided for
> > what you want to do you
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
> dsimcha wrote:
> > Maybe I'm doing something subtly wrong here, but I've checked all the
> > obvious
> > stuff.
> >
> > import std.stdio, std.random, std.array;
> >
> > import dstats.base : Perm;
> >
> > void main() {
>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> The horrible thing about all this is it makes using a multithreaded
> WeakRef horribly slow. Even if the GC facility were provided for
> what you want to do you're talking about acquiring a mutex in
> the GC for every deref operation. What a
dsimcha wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something subtly wrong here, but I've checked all the obvious
stuff.
import std.stdio, std.random, std.array;
import dstats.base : Perm;
void main() {
uint[int[]] counts;
immutable int[] foo = [1,2,3];
// Make sure every permutation is represented in
On 2009-04-20 22:19:42 +0200, Jason House said:
Sean Kelly Wrote:
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
Jason House Wrote:
If I understand you correctly, a weak reference library needs to query
the GC to see if an object is
marked for collection. How do I do t
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> >
> > You're guaranteed that the GC will notify you when it finalizes
> > the referenced object, so you shouldn't have to query the GC
> > at all. Just copy the reference into a GC-scannable location
> > and th
Maybe I'm doing something subtly wrong here, but I've checked all the obvious
stuff.
import std.stdio, std.random, std.array;
import dstats.base : Perm;
void main() {
uint[int[]] counts;
immutable int[] foo = [1,2,3];
// Make sure every permutation is represented in counts.
fore
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> == Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> > Jason House Wrote:
> > >
> > > If I understand you correctly, a weak reference library needs to query
> > > the GC to see if an object is
> marked for collection. How do I do this?
> > Here's the implementat
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> Jason House Wrote:
> >
> > If I understand you correctly, a weak reference library needs to query the
> > GC to see if an object is
marked for collection. How do I do this?
> Here's the implementation I'm currently thinking of:
>
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> > Daniel Keep wrote:
> > >
> > > Sean Kelly wrote:
> > >> Jason House wrote:
> > >>> Jason House wrote:
> > >>>
> > Tango's GC (and therefore
> > druntime's GC) has an explicit notification mechanism.
Jason House Wrote:
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
>
> > Daniel Keep wrote:
> > >
> > > Sean Kelly wrote:
> > >> Jason House wrote:
> > >>> Jason House wrote:
> > >>>
> > Tango's GC (and therefore
> > druntime's GC) has an explicit notification mechanism.
> > >>> I guess I shouldn't have assumed t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yigal Chripun wrote:
> On 19/04/2009 22:52, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
What's a rationale behind an issue described bug 2621?
htt
Sean Kelly Wrote:
> Daniel Keep wrote:
> >
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> >> Jason House wrote:
> >>> Jason House wrote:
> >>>
> Tango's GC (and therefore
> druntime's GC) has an explicit notification mechanism.
> >>> I guess I shouldn't have assumed that the features of tango became
> >>> par
Daniel Keep wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Tango's GC (and therefore
druntime's GC) has an explicit notification mechanism.
I guess I shouldn't have assumed that the features of tango became
part of druntime. I don't see any notification mechanism :(
Same a
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Haven't used D2 for much stuff, but does this work? I remember
reading something about partial IFTI, so if you have
opDotExp(string fname, T...) (T args){}
and you call
opDotExp!("b")(c, d, e)
Does it implicitly define T?
-Steve
It
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Haven't used D2 for much stuff, but does this work? I remember reading
something about partial IFTI, so if you have
opDotExp(string fname, T...) (T args){}
and you call
opDotExp!("b")(c, d, e)
Does it implicitly define T?
-Steve
It should, but there's a bug re
On 2009-04-20 07:25:43 -0400, Christopher Wright said:
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
The utility is when you are looking for methods to invoke via runtime
reflection, you can determine that a given function is one of these
runtime opDotExp equivalents.
So it is being argued that there shou
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:47:53 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:54:21 -0400, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:09:28 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes, there are many things that opDotExp can do tha
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:54:21 -0400, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:09:28 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes, there are many things that opDotExp can do that opDot or alias
this (which is essentially opDot without any code).
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:54:21 -0400, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:09:28 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes, there are many things that opDotExp can do that opDot or alias
this (which is essentially opDot without any code). Hooking every
function
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
The utility is when you are looking for methods to invoke via runtime
reflection, you can determine that a given function is one of these
runtime opDotExp equivalents.
So it is being argued that there should be a standard way to do a run
time function invocation
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:09:28 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes, there are many things that opDotExp can do that opDot or alias this
(which is essentially opDot without any code). Hooking every function
call on a type seems to be one of the two killer use cases of this
feature (the o
Hello Yigal,
I was meaning static as in "static if".
I agree with what you've written here. I think my point in this
sub-thread is a bit side-tracked from the main topic.
there seems to be a lot of that in this thread
again, what you said is correct, but since in our example we are
discussin
33 matches
Mail list logo
