Jason House:
>Many functions in Phobos are not marked as pure even though they could be.
>That limits pure's use for me)<
If you list them then Walter may later fix Phobos.
Bye,
bearophile
Hello JMNorris,
And the medical journal article?
It needs to show that contributing to this open source app in D cures
erectile disfunction.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in news:h18i1p
$16l...@digitalmars.com:
> So these
> votes seem to reflect a prior dislike to anything D and the immediate
> negative voting of anything related to it. I wonder how such this could
> be addressed.
Two killer apps written in D plus one article in a med
superdan Wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander
> > Pánek wrote:
> > > Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am sorry.
> > >
> > > I am not. Im just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
> > >
> > > Also: wtf, Jarrett. Is that really y
Hello superdan,
superdan's always rite.
Ah, one of my favorate words
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/right
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rite
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wright
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/write
for a given sound, it has more
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander
> Pánek wrote:
> > Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> >>
> >> I am sorry.
> >
> > I am not. Im just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
> >
> > Also: wtf, Jarrett. Is that really you?
>
> That was me on beer. I'm an a
Jeroen Dirks Wrote:
> Does anyone know the answer to this D related question on SO?
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008803/how-to-use-pure-in-d-2-0/
addMsg is not marked pure and pure functions can't call impure functions... I'm
not sure if addMsg can be marked pure or not. It does not
Steve Teale Wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:40 PM, superdan wrote:
> > > == Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s
> > > article
> > >> Sorry, I thought you were degrading yourself. I should have read more
> > >> carefully.
> > >
>
BCS wrote:
Reply to Jeroen,
Does anyone know the answer to this D related question on SO?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008803/how-to-use-pure-in-d-2-0/
DMD can't tell that the method call is safe even though it is inpure.
Also, the purity of a function is determined by its signatur
Jeroen Dirks:
> Does anyone know the answer to this D related question on SO?
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008803/how-to-use-pure-in-d-2-0/
I like this answer:
>you may have found case where the compiler's semantic analysis is not as good
>as your brain's.<
"pure" is something that has
Reply to Jeroen,
Does anyone know the answer to this D related question on SO?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008803/how-to-use-pure-in-d-2-0/
DMD can't tell that the method call is safe even though it is inpure.
Does anyone know the answer to this D related question on SO?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008803/how-to-use-pure-in-d-2-0/
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "BCS" wrote in message
> news:78ccfa2d425018cbbd5558039...@news.digitalmars.com...
>> Reply to Nick,
>>>
>>> (And why in the world is my ng client randomly deciding not to quote
>>> the replied-to message and make me do it manually? Weird..
bearophile wrote:
Frits van Bommel:
[LDC] [1]: It currently does not realize the array load can be done before the
function call, but I submitted a patch to LLVM for that. (This is why it currently
needs to be split up, so that LDC emits the load before the function call)<
I guess you mean
"BCS" wrote in message
news:78ccfa2d425018cbbd5558039...@news.digitalmars.com...
> Reply to Nick,
>>
>> (And why in the world is my ng client randomly deciding not to quote
>> the replied-to message and make me do it manually? Weird...)
>>
>
> My client only quotes what is slected (if anything is
Reply to Nick,
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in
message
news:mailman.281.1245252324.13405.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander
Pánek wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
I am sorry.
I am not. Im just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
Also
>"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote in message
> >news:mailman.281.1245252324.13405.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander
>Pánek wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>>
>>> I am sorry.
>>
>> I am not. Im just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
>>
>> Al
Frits van Bommel:
>[LDC] [1]: It currently does not realize the array load can be done before the
>function call, but I submitted a patch to LLVM for that. (This is why it
>currently needs to be split up, so that LDC emits the load before the function
>call)<
I guess you mean this:
http://llvm
Frits van Bommel wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Some are ignorant (the author concluded that dmd can't optimize tail
recursion by trying it with the non-tail-recursive factorial
function; and I took the time to explain him!).<
If I compile this D2 program with DMD:
import std.stdio: printf;
import
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Alexander
Pánek wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>
>> I am sorry.
>
> I am not. I’m just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
>
> Also: wtf, Jarrett. Is that really you?
That was me on beer. I'm an apologetic drunk. Should this be telling
me someth
bearophile wrote:
Some comments are patently false (such as the one that you must compile with dmc
to call C functions on Windows).<
Is this true? I have seen many times people here answer that code has to be
compiled with DMC, etc. If I am wrong I'll fix the text.
I thought this was pretty
I have written some comments about the article written by Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8t7s1/the_case_for_d_the_other_side_of_the_coin/
Andrei has commented some things on Reddit, I think it's better to move the
discussion here.
If there are wrong things in
I find lot of tango code uses stack as an optimization for using less
heap, e.g. concat strings. It's astonishingly common, and painful to make
it const correct, thus D2 hostile.
Ideas?
--
使用 Opera 革命性的电子邮件客户程序: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Brad Roberts wrote:
This has come up before and never really gone anywhere. I've considered setting
up a new, modern, wiki for us to migrate to. Prowiki has a number of
limitations that annoy me at least. The biggest is it's history management
sucks. Looking at what changed over time is eithe
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
I am sorry.
I am not. I’m just thankful for being proven wrong when necessary.
Also: wtf, Jarrett. Is that really you?
25 matches
Mail list logo
