Re: Operator overloading, structs

2009-06-26 Thread Don
Leandro Lucarella wrote: Don, el 10 de junio a las 03:50 me escribiste: Leandro Lucarella wrote: Don, el 10 de junio a las 02:02 me escribiste: bearophile wrote: Leandro Lucarella: I think the more general solution is to allow multiple implicit cast operators and simply provide implicit conv

Re: D2 Multithreading Architecture

2009-06-26 Thread Nick B
see below for the latest post on this subject from Bartosz. http://bartoszmilewski.wordpress.com/

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Walter Bright
Robert Clipsham wrote: I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and hopefully inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. Pick one of the items you find the most interesting, and work on it!

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Daniel Keep
Walter Bright wrote: > Robert Clipsham wrote: >> I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and >> hopefully inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. > > Pick one of the items you find the most interesting, and work on it! On a semi-related note, someone came on IR

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Don
Daniel Keep wrote: Walter Bright wrote: Robert Clipsham wrote: I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and hopefully inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. Pick one of the items you find the most interesting, and work on it! On a semi-related note, someone

Re: DDoc source (was Dejavu)

2009-06-26 Thread Justin Calvarese
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article ... > > On a semi-related note, someone came on IRC today asking about the > > wc example in the D2 pages. It's broken since it hasn't been > > updated since the pages were split. I was going to fix the code, > > but the DDoc source of the website i

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Derek Parnell
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:28:05 +0200, Don wrote: > Daniel Keep wrote: >> >> Walter Bright wrote: >>> Robert Clipsham wrote: I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and hopefully inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. >>> Pick one of the items you find th

Re: DDoc source (was Dejavu)

2009-06-26 Thread Daniel Keep
Justin Calvarese wrote: > == Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article > >>> On a semi-related note, someone came on IRC today asking about the >>> wc example in the D2 pages. It's broken since it hasn't been >>> updated since the pages were split. I was going to fix the code, >>> but t

Re: DDoc source (was Dejavu)

2009-06-26 Thread BCS
Hello Justin, I found http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/browser/trunk/docsrc/wc.dd (which I assume to be for the D 2.x Spec). So where is the source for the D 1.x Spec? It might be helpful to have those files in the SVN, too. Last time I checked, that was both, the version differences

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Paul D. Anderson
digited Wrote: > Robert Clipsham Wrote: > > === IDEs === > > Poseidon also has a great potential (written in D & DWT - fast & small), > especially the Tango trunk/DWT win trunk: keinfarbton did a great work. I > suppose, in perspective, Poseidon can run on any platform, supported by > Tango+DW

Re: DDoc source (was Dejavu)

2009-06-26 Thread Walter Bright
BCS wrote: Last time I checked, that was both, the version differences are handled with DDoc macros. That's right.

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Steve Teale
Walter Bright Wrote: > Robert Clipsham wrote: > > I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and hopefully > > inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. > > Pick one of the items you find the most interesting, and work on it! Walter, But then if you do, my experien

int nan

2009-06-26 Thread bearophile
The following comes partially from a friend of mine. If you are busy you can skip this post of musings. >From the docs: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/faq.html#nan >Because of the way CPUs are designed, there is no NaN value for integers, so D >uses 0 instead. It doesn't have the advantages of

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Walter Bright
Steve Teale wrote: Walter Bright Wrote: Robert Clipsham wrote: I'd like to know what you think on each of these matters, and hopefully inspire us to take some action to make sure D succeeds. Pick one of the items you find the most interesting, and work on it! Walter, But then if you do, m

Re: int nan

2009-06-26 Thread dsimcha
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article > The following comes partially from a friend of mine. If you are busy you can skip this post of musings. > From the docs: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/faq.html#nan > >Because of the way CPUs are designed, there is no NaN value for

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Walter Bright, el 26 de junio a las 12:30 me escribiste: > >Where do you post it, who do you send it to, who is the judge, and > >where is the verdict posted? > >D should try to avoid being like Iran! > > Here's one example Robert mentioned: getting D support into the GDB main > source. That does

Re: Dejavu

2009-06-26 Thread Walter Bright
Leandro Lucarella wrote: Walter Bright, el 26 de junio a las 12:30 me escribiste: Where do you post it, who do you send it to, who is the judge, and where is the verdict posted? D should try to avoid being like Iran! Here's one example Robert mentioned: getting D support into the GDB main source

Re: int nan

2009-06-26 Thread Nick Sabalausky
"bearophile" wrote in message news:h237c9$or...@digitalmars.com... > The following comes partially from a friend of mine. If you are busy you > can skip this post of musings. > > From the docs: > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/faq.html#nan >>Because of the way CPUs are designed, there is no Na