retard Wrote:
>
> What is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
> which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
> D in serious / mission critical / money bringing projects, but instead as
> a hobby.
I've yet to use a compiler that had zero
"Matthias Pleh" wrote in message
news:ht6t33$2fv...@digitalmars.com...
> Am 21.05.2010 22:27, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
>> "Matthias Pleh" wrote in message
>> news:ht6p7t$27s...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> Oh god, we have to inform micropoll, there is more than the USA ...
>>
>> "Kagamin" wrote i
"Eric Poggel" wrote in message
news:ht7i0u$hv...@digitalmars.com...
> On 5/21/2010 1:57 PM, retard wrote:
>> hat is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
>> which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
>> D in serious / mission critical / mon
Matthias Pleh Wrote:
> Am 21.05.2010 22:27, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
> > "Matthias Pleh" wrote in message
> > news:ht6p7t$27s...@digitalmars.com...
> >>
> >> Oh god, we have to inform micropoll, there is more than the USA ...
> >
> > "Kagamin" wrote in message
> > news:ht6jgv$1tb...@digitalmars.
On 5/21/2010 1:57 PM, retard wrote:
hat is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
D in serious / mission critical / money bringing projects, but instead as
a hobby.
Or possibly, D newsgroup follow
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:19 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "div0" wrote in message
> news:ht3tfa$2sm...@digitalmars.com...
> >
> > I'm surprised so many people who don't use D bother to read this news
> > group and voted on the poll. Surely they must have better things to do.
> >
>
> I have a
Am 21.05.2010 22:27, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
"Matthias Pleh" wrote in message
news:ht6p7t$27s...@digitalmars.com...
Oh god, we have to inform micropoll, there is more than the USA ...
"Kagamin" wrote in message
news:ht6jgv$1tb...@digitalmars.com...
I'd appreciate js, but pissed off by fl
"Matthias Pleh" wrote in message
news:ht6p7t$27s...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Oh god, we have to inform micropoll, there is more than the USA ...
"Kagamin" wrote in message
news:ht6jgv$1tb...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I'd appreciate js, but pissed off by flash.
Yea, micropoll unfortunately has a lo
Am 20.05.2010 08:52, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
I'm interested in trying to gauge the current state of D version usage, so
I've set up a poll:
http://micropoll.com/t/KEFfsZBH5F
I apologize for using MicroPoll (and all its manditory-JavaScript-ness). I
personally hate MicroPoll but everything else
Walter Bright wrote:
What matters not is the number of bugs, it is whether they block
reasonable use of the compiler. Just one bug can make it unusable,
whereas a thousand insignificant ones may not.
In Steven's dcollections
excerpt starting from dcollections/model/List.d, line #80:
// workar
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> I apologize for using MicroPoll (and all its manditory-JavaScript-ness). I
> personally hate MicroPoll but everything else I've seen is even worse and I
> don't have time to make a custom one.
I'd appreciate js, but pissed off by flash.
retard wrote:
What is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
D in serious / mission critical / money bringing projects, but instead as
a hobby.
What matters not is the number of bugs, it is whe
Bane Wrote:
> > What is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
> > which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
> > D in serious / mission critical / money bringing projects, but instead as
> > a hobby.
>
> I'm in serious business with it.
> What is more interesting is that the majority of D users already use D2,
> which has a huge list of bugs. It just tells that most D users don't use
> D in serious / mission critical / money bringing projects, but instead as
> a hobby.
I'm in serious business with it. I think D1 is up to it
Thu, 20 May 2010 10:06:17 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> retard wrote:
>> It's a rookie mistake to believe that languages have some kind of
>> differences performance wise.
>
> Well, they do. It's also true that these performance differences can be
> swamped by the quality of the implementation, a
Fri, 21 May 2010 11:00:32 -0400, Bane wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
>> news:ht3uj4$30f...@digitalmars.com...
>> > "div0" wrote in message
>> > news:ht3tfa$2sm...@digitalmars.com...
>> >>
>> >> I'm surprised so many people who don't use D bother to read
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> news:ht3uj4$30f...@digitalmars.com...
> > "div0" wrote in message
> > news:ht3tfa$2sm...@digitalmars.com...
> >>
> >> I'm surprised so many people who don't use D bother to read this news
> >> group and voted on the poll. Surely the
Alex Makhotin Wrote:
> IMHO, such inconsistencies must be
> restricted or forbidden until documented properly. The compiler should
> give warnings whenever possible and as many as needed to help detect bugs.
> From my point of view, a good designed language should not, in
> principle, allow un
The problem you are talking of is actually a miscompilation. Why do you expect
miscompiled code to work correctly? I can think of other means to miscompile
code, so what?
Alex Makhotin:
> As I look at D, I do not experience such attitude.
D is a big step forward compared to C.
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile wrote:
Near the end it says:
If we change the value of the optional argument from 0 to 1, we have to recompile
all calling code for the calling code to get the updated value! For folks shipping
assemblies for a living, this means that optional argument values don't version
well, a
21 matches
Mail list logo
