Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
>
> In any case, that means that it could be made required to have a control
> statement at the end of a case block without having to specify a specific
> destination for fallthrough - though I'd prefer "continue switch" over "goto
> case" since it's more explicit and le
Rory McGuire Wrote:
>
> I think perhaps you mis-understood, it is mostly not stupidity that causes
> people to use
> undocumented "features" of an API but rather, it is people being overly
> "clever".
Or sometimes simply desperation. There are some classes of apps that require
the use of un
Leandro Lucarella pisze:
Walter Bright, el 20 de junio a las 19:32 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Why will you assume I'm so dumb that I won't use your
interface correctly?
Windows has had major legacy compatibility issues because critical
third party applications misused the APIs.
P
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> On 06/20/2010 06:18 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:17:28 +0300, Walter Bright
> > wrote:
> >
> >> An input to a dll is user input, and should be validated (for the sake
> >> of security, and other reasons). Validating it is not debugging.
> >
KennyTM~:
> That is just C#'s switch syntax.
Some of the C# designers are people with a long experience in implementing
(Pascal-like) programming languages. Convergent evolution is a way to confirm
my idea was good, then :-)
>And I don't see how the current switch syntax is "hairy".<
Even if
"Eldar Insafutdinov" wrote in message
news:hvo49k$1uk...@digitalmars.com...
>
> In the end, Windows is the most popular
> OS despite our personal preferences, and it's worth spending some time for
> it.
>
I wish someone could convince LLVM of that...
KennyTM~ wrote:
> On Jun 19, 10 07:17, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> bearophile wrote:
>>
>>> 2) switch cases that don't end with goto or break:
>>>
>>> void main() {
>>> int x, y;
>>> switch (x) {
>>> case 0: y++;
>>> default: y--;
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> I, for one, _want
Brad Roberts Wrote:
> On 6/21/2010 9:18 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> > Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:50:04 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Notice I've replaced "foo" with "f"
> >>>
> >>> Foo is the class, but there's no mention of "foo". I'm gue
On 6/21/2010 9:18 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:50:04 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Notice I've replaced "foo" with "f"
>>>
>>> Foo is the class, but there's no mention of "foo". I'm guessing it was a
>>> typo, unless I'm mis
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:18:47 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:50:04 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
> Notice I've replaced "foo" with "f"
>
> Foo is the class, but there's no mention of "foo". I'm guessing it
was a
> typo, unless I'm missu
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
> What is the long-term plan for the current DMD backend? I've noticed the
> first steps towards 64-bit support were just checked in today (excitement to
> the extreme). However, the backend is under such a restrictive license (which
> I underst
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:50:04 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
> wrote:
>
>
> > Notice I've replaced "foo" with "f"
> >
> > Foo is the class, but there's no mention of "foo". I'm guessing it was a
> > typo, unless I'm missunderstanding something.
> >
>
> Yes, it's a typo
dsimcha wrote:
> What is the long-term plan for the current DMD backend? I've noticed
> the
> first steps towards 64-bit support were just checked in today
> (excitement to
> the extreme). However, the backend is under such a restrictive
> license (which
> I understand Walter is not free to chan
What is the long-term plan for the current DMD backend? I've noticed the
first steps towards 64-bit support were just checked in today (excitement to
the extreme). However, the backend is under such a restrictive license (which
I understand Walter is not free to change) that it has a "bus factor"
On Jun 21, 10 17:52, bearophile wrote:
Andrei:
The intent is to only require a control flow transfer if there is at least one
statement after the label.<
The current switch syntax is already very hairy (even lot of people on this
newsgroup are ignorant about some parts of it!) and it contai
On 06/21/2010 04:07 AM, Ben Hanson wrote:
== Quote from Ellery Newcomer (ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu)'s article
On 06/19/2010 03:35 AM, Ben Hanson wrote:
I can't prove what the comlexity is for DFA compilation, but instead, I
challenge anyone to show slow compilation times with any DFA compatibl
On 06/19/2010 11:27 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 06/19/2010 10:55 PM, BCS wrote:
Hello Nick,
"BCS" wrote in message
news:a6268ff154ca8ccddf1ef51e...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Ellery,
Generally I think D's CT capabilities have a way to go yet before
this would be worth tackling. E.g.
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 21 de junio a las 08:02 me escribiste:
> On 06/20/2010 11:08 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Walter Bright, el 20 de junio a las 19:32 me escribiste:
> >>Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >>>Why will you assume I'm so dumb that I won't use your
> >>>interface correctly?
> >>
> >>Wi
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:08:01 +0200, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Walter Bright, el 20 de junio a las 19:32 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>Why will you assume I'm so dumb that I won't use your
>interface correctly?
Windows has had major legacy compatibility issues because critical
thir
On 06/21/2010 06:43 AM, Ben Hanson wrote:
I've changed the code to use CharT[] again, which simplified things
substantially. However, I can't find a way to erase characters from a char[].
Can anyone help?
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_array.html#replace
Andrei
On 06/21/2010 03:37 AM, Ben Hanson wrote:
I'm currently using strings for the regex strings themselves. In lexertl, I use
templated free functions what work with iterators, which means input can come
from different sources. This sounds like the kind of thing you are talking
about?
Regards,
Ben
On 06/20/2010 11:08 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 20 de junio a las 19:32 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Why will you assume I'm so dumb that I won't use your
interface correctly?
Windows has had major legacy compatibility issues because critical
third party applicat
Is is possible to add to Phobos standard functions (intrinsics, if necessary)
that give some information about the C stack? Things like:
- Available space left on the stack (for a thread)
- Total size of the stack at program start
- The direction of stack growth (see for example
http://www.devx.
Ben Hanson:
> However, I can't find a way to erase characters from a char[].
> Can anyone help?
If you need to delete the last chars you can just decrease the length. If you
need to delete chars in the middle you can copy items with memmove() and then
decrease the length. You can also write a fu
I've changed the code to use CharT[] again, which simplified things
substantially. However, I can't find a way to erase characters from a char[].
Can anyone help?
See the current code below.
Thanks,
Ben
module main;
import std.algorithm;
import std.string;
template regex(CharT)
{
struct basic
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:50:04 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Notice I've replaced "foo" with "f"
Foo is the class, but there's no mention of "foo". I'm guessing it was a
typo, unless I'm missunderstanding something.
Yes, it's a typo. You should file a bug.
-Steve
bearophile wrote:
Andrei:
The intent is to only require a control flow transfer if there is at least one
statement after the label.<
The current switch syntax is already very hairy (even lot of people on this
newsgroup are ignorant about some parts of it!) and it contains one or more
speci
Andrei:
>The intent is to only require a control flow transfer if there is at least one
>statement after the label.<
The current switch syntax is already very hairy (even lot of people on this
newsgroup are ignorant about some parts of it!) and it contains one or more
special cases. So I sugge
== Quote from Ellery Newcomer (ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu)'s article
> On 06/19/2010 03:35 AM, Ben Hanson wrote:
> > I can't prove what the comlexity is for DFA compilation, but instead, I
> > challenge anyone to show slow compilation times with any DFA compatible
> > regex.
> > As I don't have so
Hi Andrei,
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
> On 06/20/2010 12:56 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> > Ben Hanson wrote:
> >> == Quote from Justin Spahr-Summers (justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com)'s
> >>> "string" is actually an alias for "immutable(char)[]" (and
> >>
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:54:26 +0200, Mengu wrote:
Hi,
I have been interested in and learning D for a while and currently
developing
a web development IDE with it. I can say that I have a middle level
knowledge
that I have been trying to increase. Anyway. I want to develop a web
server
fo
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:04:21 +0200, Justin Johansson wrote:
Me thinks this both a polite question and a question due of realistic
answers.
How doth thou respond?
Not sure, but what I do think is:
If D ran on ARM it would be a favorite for mobile devices, often programs
are just too slo
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
