On 05/02/2011 03:10 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Is dynamic linking supported on Linux with DMD 2.052 (and D2 in general)?
I am not talking about Phobos, just modules which I want to compile as DSO.
There is -fPIC switch to DMD - does it work as intended?
PS: gdc is not an option...
The short
> Is dynamic linking supported on Linux with DMD 2.052 (and D2 in general)?
>
> I am not talking about Phobos, just modules which I want to compile as DSO.
>
> There is -fPIC switch to DMD - does it work as intended?
>
> PS: gdc is not an option...
The short answer: no.
As for the long answer,
Is dynamic linking supported on Linux with DMD 2.052 (and D2 in general)?
I am not talking about Phobos, just modules which I want to compile as DSO.
There is -fPIC switch to DMD - does it work as intended?
PS: gdc is not an option...
--
/Alexander
If you are coming from java, you are probalby used to the ideal world of
VM programming, where everything is abstracted away from the actual
platform you are running on.
What you are trying to do with replacing kernel32.dll pokes around in
very lowlevel Windows specific implementation details.
On 04/29/2011 07:13 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-04-28 21:46, Timon Gehr wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/28/11 11:00 AM, Alexander wrote:
On 28.04.2011 17:46, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It works, but it makes the if statement ugly again. :)
Well, just a bit - still much better than
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:02:55 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
2. the GC is conservative, and you are allocating swaths of 1K objects.
It's quite possible that you are running into false pointer issues.
This
might be helped with a more precise GC (which there is a patch
