On 2011-05-20 00:45, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
news:ir43p5$21q7$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm not sure when these came out, but the last time I've tried using git
and github the instructions were a little bit messed up (i.e. windows
instructions mixed up with linux
On 2011-05-19 23:45, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/19/2011 1:28 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
It seems to be on digitalmars.com now so I guess you did it yourself :)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/etc_c_curl.html
Wow!! The "Jump to" section fills up my entire screen.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ir46pp$26h7$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Now if only the Dulwich people would quit pretending this was a minor
> issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dulwich/+bug/670035 ...Then I'd
> actually be able to start using hg-git/TortoiseHg instead of putting up
Am 20.05.2011, 01:14 Uhr, schrieb Robert Clipsham
:
Mercurial has rebase too, just as an extension. Rebase is incredibly
useful if you want to avoid having hundreds of "Merge from revision ..."
commits everywhere. Of course, if you rebase commits that other people
have already pulled you're
On 19/05/2011 23:45, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Now if only the Dulwich people would quit pretending this was a minor issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dulwich/+bug/670035 ...Then I'd actually be
able to start using hg-git/TortoiseHg instead of putting up with the
convoluted mess that git is...(Reb
"Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
news:ir43p5$21q7$1...@digitalmars.com...
> I'm not sure when these came out, but the last time I've tried using git
> and github the instructions were a little bit messed up (i.e. windows
> instructions mixed up with linux instructions) and I couldn't really g
This could be a fantastic feature for a potential tutorial section on
dpl.org. The user could learn things about D and try out his own code
snippets on the fly.
I'm not sure when these came out, but the last time I've tried using git and
github the instructions were a little bit messed up (i.e. windows instructions
mixed up with linux instructions) and I couldn't really get anything to work
back then. But they've made new ones, with screenshots and the
On 5/19/2011 1:28 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
It seems to be on digitalmars.com now so I guess you did it yourself :)
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/etc_c_curl.html
I did pretty much a whack job on it, merely converting the existing comments to
ddoc comments, just to fill the void.
It coul
I screwed around on the github website and got to a point where
I think it worked - you should have a pull request for it. The
changes are really trivial, so should be easy to review manually.
I kept the actual editable_code.js on the same domain as the
example code runs because it was easier for
On 5/19/11 3:28 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
[snip]
Speaking of which, what's the status on recycling them buffers? :o)
Andrei
On 5/19/11 3:28 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
Den 19-05-2011 00:46, Andrei Alexandrescu skrev:
On 5/18/11 5:34 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
Den 18-05-2011 19:59, Walter Bright skrev:
On 5/18/2011 10:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I sat down to write an announcement to the libcurl mailing list that
we have
su
Den 19-05-2011 00:46, Andrei Alexandrescu skrev:
On 5/18/11 5:34 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
Den 18-05-2011 19:59, Walter Bright skrev:
On 5/18/2011 10:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I sat down to write an announcement to the libcurl mailing list that
we have
support for it starting with 2.053. To
On 19/05/11 1:25 PM, %u wrote:
Hi!
Is this a bug, or is it intentional that this fails? I can't come up
with any case where it would cause a problem, but the compiler doesn't
like the fact that there's a const in the structure:
struct Temp { const int a; int b; }
auto ref foo(Temp* t
> Bruno Medeiros:
>
> > I wasn't saying code conventions are good enough for all kinds of human
> > errors, I was just talking about this particular one, of confusing and
> > overlapping variable and type names.
>
> I think in this case some compiler strictness is better than code conventions.
Few
Bruno Medeiros:
> I wasn't saying code conventions are good enough for all kinds of human
> errors, I was just talking about this particular one, of confusing and
> overlapping variable and type names.
I think in this case some compiler strictness is better than code conventions.
Few days ago
On 06/05/2011 17:52, bearophile wrote:
Bruno Medeiros, Software Engineer:
This is why there are code conventions that have different rules for
naming variables/fields and types, so you don't confuse them...
Walter has just shown slides in D.announce that explain why sometimes code
convention
Den 19-05-2011 00:54, Andrei Alexandrescu skrev:
On 5/18/11 5:29 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
Den 18-05-2011 16:53, Andrei Alexandrescu skrev:
On 5/18/11 6:07 AM, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Select will wait for data to be ready and ask curl to handle the data
chunk. Curl in turn calls back to a registered ca
On Thu, 19 May 2011 00:27:51 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On 2011-05-18 21:09, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
> The huge advantage of assert over writeln is that it shows you what
the
> result is supposed to be. If you're reading the code or documentation,
> that's extrem
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Timon Gehr wrote:
> >
> > 1. Deprecate using CommaExpression inside ParanthesizedExpression. (This
> > does not
> > affect most code that uses the comma operator!)
> > 2. Wait a few releases.
> > 3. Introduce straightforward, built-in tuples:
> [snip]
>
> We've been th
On Thu, 19 May 2011 07:42:57 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:03:05 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Having seen quite a few incorrect descriptions of how D slices work
(particularly regarding appending), I wrote an article that tries to
describe how D slices work,
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:03:05 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Having seen quite a few incorrect descriptions of how D slices work
> (particularly regarding appending), I wrote an article that tries to
> describe how D slices work, and why they behave the way they do.
>
> Being one of the only
On Thu, 19 May 2011 00:22:42 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On 2011-05-18 20:55, %u wrote:
Hi!
Is this a bug, or is it intentional that this fails? I can't come up
with any case where it would cause a problem, but the compiler doesn't
like the fact that there's a const in the structure:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 21:07:21 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
I haven't spent the time to figure out github yet!
I highly recommend http://progit.org
I haven't touched git in so long though, I'll probably have to skim
through it again the next time I do git!
-Steve
Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 18, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
If serialization will be clever enough, these fibers could even be shared
across different servers! This is really a requirement in load balanced
environments.
A very old research paper (I think
Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 18, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 18, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
On May 17, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
But couldn't Fiber's stack be scanned for references to itself and readjusted?
Your test was a good one, the build fails on even a simple hello world
program. I'm using the dmd2-complete package from the AUR (archlinux
user repository). Where should the phobos/druntime libraries be placed
on the system?
On 18/05/11 18:48, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Can you build a simple hel
On 5/19/11 2:56 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* The way I see a nice implementation would be (inspired from Jens'
work) via a class that defines the client-level methods as final,
and has 2-3 extension methods that do the work. That way there's no
need for awkward extra name
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/18/11 8:00 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> >I also think that having competing logging module is a good thing.
> >This process will result in a better module for phobos and as a result
> >a better module for the user.
>
> Clearly there are advantages to competing
Thanks! Indeed it would make sense but I really agree it seems unintuitive.
Adrien
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 21:44, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:11:56 -0400, Adrien Chauve
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> anyone on the alias difference?
>>
>
> I have a feeling that alias needs to b
30 matches
Mail list logo
