On 7/30/2011 9:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/usisvde/archive/2011/07/30/channel-9-goes-native-with-show-for-c-developers.aspx
TIL I'm going to be a guest on it!
Am 29.07.2011 22:02, schrieb Walter Bright:
> Here's another one:
>
>T* p;
>...
>if (A)
>p = &t;
>...
>if (B)
>... *p ...
>
> B is true if and only if A is true. B can even be the same expression as
> A, such as a->b->c. Clang complains on the *p that p is "uni
On 31-07-2011 07:27, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think that it would be useful to query the community for what piece of
library functionality they don't currently have in D and would most like to
see. For instance, there is no official logging framework in D or any 3rd party
libraries which do it A
On Sunday 31 July 2011 01:53:25 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
> news:mailman.1978.1312090051.14074.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> >I think that it would be useful to query the community for what piece of
> >
> > library functionality they don't currently have in
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.1978.1312090051.14074.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>I think that it would be useful to query the community for what piece of
> library functionality they don't currently have in D and would most like
> to
> see. For instance, there is no officia
I think that it would be useful to query the community for what piece of
library functionality they don't currently have in D and would most like to
see. For instance, there is no official logging framework in D or any 3rd party
libraries which do it AFAIK. So, that could be one type of function
On Sunday 31 July 2011 00:04:33 Caligo wrote:
> 7k views in one day, now that's just epic. 2011 might as be the year for D.
However, the vote count isn't anywhere near 7k, so either people are deciding
not to vote, or (more likely) it's seeing a lot of views from people who don't
normally visit
7k views in one day, now that's just epic. 2011 might as be the year for D.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/usisvde/archive/2011/07/30/channel-9-goes-native-with-show-for-c-developers.aspx
Andrei
"Peter Alexander" wrote in message
news:j129s3$29oh$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 31/07/11 12:38 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 07/30/2011 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 7/30/2011 1:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manuall
On 31/07/11 12:38 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 07/30/2011 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2011 1:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manually -
the post has
been autobanned.
Done.
It's up. Comment away!
http://www.reddit.co
Ugh, I hate seeing so much factually wrong stuff. It's one thing
to have different opinions, but half the anti-D folks remind me of
myself circa 2003.
I went to digitalmars.com to update my copy of the 16 bit C compiler
(yes, I used that thing for a long time. Sometimes still do!).
I saw a link t
On 07/30/2011 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/30/2011 1:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manually -
the post has
been autobanned.
Done.
It's up. Comment away!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_tha
The file "dmd2\src\druntime\src\rt\minit.obj" in the 2.054 zip is out of
date WRT the matching asm file. (At least as far as the timestamps, I don't
know about the actual file content.) On systems without masm386 installed,
this causes automated DMD builders to fail without manual user intervent
On Saturday 30 July 2011 21:09:48 Don wrote:
> dsimcha wrote:
> > The following look like they are simple matters of programming and could
> > be implemented eventually:
> >
> > With statements, scope statements, try-catch-finally statements, throw
> > statements.
> >
> > Delete expressions.
> >
On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:38:33 Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:27:33 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 11 17:00, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:47:55 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
> >>> - hasDrive, isDriveRoot: the path
> >>>
> >>> "#:\x"
> >>>
>
On Saturday 30 July 2011 10:16:49 bearophile wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> This is part 7 of your answer:
> >Member functions of classes are polymorphic by default. You can't declare
> >them non-virtual. It's up to the compiler to decide if they can be (which
> >really is only the case if they're
On 7/30/2011 1:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manually - the post has
been autobanned.
Done.
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 1:29:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Walter Bright" wrote in message
> news:j11hfi$10tv$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 7/30/2011 2:05 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>>> http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
>>>
>>> Why is the "linux" version
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:j11hfi$10tv$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 7/30/2011 2:05 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>> http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
>>
>> Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase?
>
> Because gcc's predefined macro is "linux
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:j11p0f$1fq7$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 07/30/2011 12:58 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Now on reddit!
>>
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_than_d/
>
> You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manually -
> What does C++ do better than D?
It's better at giving you enough time during a compile to grab a sandwich
and a latte, and generally goof off with the excuse "Can't do anything else
right now - it's compiling".
Boo to D, for making me have to be productive!
On 07/30/2011 12:58 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Now on reddit!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_than_d/
You may want to kindly message the moderators to approve manually - the
post has been autobanned.
Andrei
On 30/07/11 8:45 PM, bearophile wrote:
Don:
Yeah, it's not fundamental, and not even very complicated. The current
implementation was a quick hack to provide the functionality, that
hasn't been replaced with a proper implementation yet. All that's
required to fix it is a bit of code in e2ir.c.
Don:
> Yeah, it's not fundamental, and not even very complicated. The current
> implementation was a quick hack to provide the functionality, that
> hasn't been replaced with a proper implementation yet. All that's
> required to fix it is a bit of code in e2ir.c.
Thank you for your (positive)
On 7/30/2011 12:09 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Let me expand a bit my reply on bugzilla.
There are other things I'd like to note, besides conforming to unicode regex
standard, that is (going to be) fully supported in upcoming next-gen std.regex.
Things I'd love to see in an upgrade of std.uni:
-
dsimcha wrote:
Ok, now that the new docs are up, I'm kind of curious about what's a fundamental
limitation vs. a todo. I assume the following are fundamental limitations,
since
CTFE has no concept of threading or global state and works by interpreting the
code, not executing it directly on the
On 30.07.2011 5:21, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/29/2011 4:24 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://training.perl.com/OSCON2011/index.html
This is a good starting point for seeing where we are with Unicode
support and
where we need to go.
One problem: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64
bearophile wrote:
Peter Alexander:
I also posted my thoughts, although I think I was a bit more negative
towards D than you were :-)
I think your answer is among the best of that thread.
Regarding this you have written:
int[3] a = [1, 2, 3]; // in D, this allocates then copies
int a[3] = {1
On 7/30/2011 2:05 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase?
Because gcc's predefined macro is "linux".
On 7/30/2011 3:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Ouch. Now you're going to make me think. My first reaction is to answer
"nothing," but there almost has to be _something_. At the moment, however, I
have no clue what that could be. I'll definitely have to think about this one.
You wrote a nice repl
Now on reddit!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_than_d/
Peter Alexander:
> I also posted my thoughts, although I think I was a bit more negative
> towards D than you were :-)
I think your answer is among the best of that thread.
Regarding this you have written:
> int[3] a = [1, 2, 3]; // in D, this allocates then copies
> int a[3] = {1, 2, 3}; // in
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
> news:j10hg0$2c11$3...@digitalmars.com...
> > http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
> >
> > Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase?
>
> Because it's from the time when D/Phobos policy was t
bearophile Wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> This is part 7 of your answer:
>
> >Member functions of classes are polymorphic by default. You can't declare
> >them non-virtual. It's up to the compiler to decide if they can be (which
> >really is only the case if they're final and aren't overriding
On 30/07/11 1:09 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 12:43:34 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Ouch. Now you're going to make me think. My first reaction is to answer
"nothing," but there almost has to be _something_. At the mo
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:27:33 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
> On Jul 30, 11 17:00, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:47:55 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
>>> - hasDrive, isDriveRoot: the path
>>>
>>> "#:\x"
>>>
>>> should not pass hasDrive. In Windows only /[a-zA-Z]/ are supported
>>> dri
Jeff Nowakovski wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 07:16 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
>>
>> Looks like that "current most voted answer" got some heavy edits to make
>> it more objective. I didn't see the original, but what I read was full
>> of misconceptions.
He didn't really do much in these edits. He exchanged s
On Jul 30, 11 17:00, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:47:55 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
On Jul 30, 11 02:06, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for the nice work!
Comments:
- pathSplitter: empty, front, back could be const. Also, make the struct
'static struct'.
Will do
Ok, I've pushed some improvements based on Johannes Pfau and KennyTM~'s
comments now. The relevant commits are dated 2011-07-30:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/commits/std-path
-Lars
On 07/30/2011 07:16 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
Looks like that "current most voted answer" got some heavy edits to make
it more objective. I didn't see the original, but what I read was full
of misconceptions.
Since the "current most voted answer" has changed to one that hasn't
been edited, I don
Jonathan M Davis:
This is part 7 of your answer:
>Member functions of classes are polymorphic by default. You can't declare them
>non-virtual. It's up to the compiler to decide if they can be (which really is
>only the case if they're final and aren't overriding a function from a base
>class).
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:11:35 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Looks like that "current most voted answer" got some heavy edits to make
it more objective. I didn't see the original, but what I read was full
of misconceptions.
It's now better worded than it was, and it's less offensively writte
On Saturday 30 July 2011 12:16:46 Alix Pexton wrote:
> On 30/07/2011 11:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:43:29 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just wanted to point this question to make sure there are feedbacks
> >> from several points of view.
> >> Some
On Saturday 30 July 2011 12:43:34 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Ouch. Now you're going to make me think. My first reaction is to answer
> > "nothing," but there almost has to be _something_. At the moment,
> > however, I
> > have no clue w
On 30/07/2011 11:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:43:29 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to point this question to make sure there are feedbacks from
several points of view.
Some points in the current most voted answer are interesting and I guess
some people
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> Ouch. Now you're going to make me think. My first reaction is to answer
> "nothing," but there almost has to be _something_. At the moment, however,
> I
> have no clue what that could be. I'll definitely have to think about this
> one.
>
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:43:29 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to point this question to make sure there are feedbacks from
> several points of view.
> Some points in the current most voted answer are interesting and I guess
> some people here will want to comment it.
> Howe
Hi,
I just wanted to point this question to make sure there are feedbacks from
several points of view.
Some points in the current most voted answer are interesting and I guess
some people here will want to comment it.
However I don't think it's a very good idea, It would be better to just try
to p
"Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
news:j10hg0$2c11$3...@digitalmars.com...
> http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
>
> Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase?
Because it's from the time when D/Phobos policy was to expect users know
where an identifi
On 2011-07-30 09:05:04 +, "Lars T. Kyllingstad"
said:
http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase? It really should be
"Linux" (see e.g. www.kernel.org).
Because Walter saw some code using "#ifdef linux" and thou
On Saturday 30 July 2011 09:05:04 Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
>
> Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase? It really should be
> "Linux" (see e.g. www.kernel.org).
Yeah. I keep screwing up and using version(Linux). To
http://d-programming-language.org/version.html#PredefinedVersions
Why is the "linux" version identifier all lowercase? It really should be
"Linux" (see e.g. www.kernel.org).
-Lars
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:47:55 +0800, KennyTM~ wrote:
> On Jul 30, 11 02:06, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>> Here's a new update based on your comments and requests. Code and docs
>> are in the usual place,
>>
>>https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-path/std/path.d
>>http://www.kylli
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:10:30 +0200, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>>Here's a new update based on your comments and requests. Code and docs
>>are in the usual place,
>>
>> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-path/std/path.d
>> http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-path
55 matches
Mail list logo
