On 9/3/11, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Related: I think that function pointers should implicitly decay to
> delegates. This would allow the compiler to optimize some delegate
> literals to function pointers if they don't access the outer scope,
> without breaking any code that wants to use such a function
On 09/03/2011 01:38 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I would be very happy to see struct RTTI go away, together with built-in
sort. Are there other features that rely on struct RTTI or is it only
built-in sort and AAs?
And the GC that needs to call destructors obv.
On 09/02/2011 07:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:17:02 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 06:15 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:04:08 -0400, Timon Gehr
wrote:
2. the format parameter should be completely optional in the signature.
This
On 09/02/2011 11:15 PM, kenji hara wrote:
2011/8/31 Jonathan M Davis:
Unfortunately however, the proposal seems to have gone nowhere thus far. Until
it does, pretty much every object is just going to use toString without
parameters, and the problems with BigInt's toString remain. However, if the
On 09/02/2011 11:49 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/2/11, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:11:50 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
So maybe this type of conversion is impossible in the first place due
to how arguments are passed?
Yes. The default value is pushed on the stack a
Yeah what's also weird is that when I clone the repo and build the
website via the makefile, copy-pasting works fine in Firefox, but when
I try to do it remotely via dpl.org, it doesn't work.
I can confirm it works fine in IE8 though. Maybe it's a plugin issue.. hmm
On Friday, September 02, 2011 23:54:27 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Speaking of websites issues, can anyone else confirm that copy/pasting
> code snippets from dpl.org doesn't copy the newlines properly when
> pasting into a text editor? I mean neither LF nor CRLF is pasted.
>
> On the dmars.com site
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:j3rjom$2rem$1...@digitalmars.com...
> "Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
> news:mailman.2652.1315000476.14074.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>> Speaking of websites issues, can anyone else confirm that copy/pasting
>> code snippets from dpl.org doesn't co
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:34:12 -0400, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Sep 1, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:46:32 -0400, Sean Kelly wrote:
Yup. I want to revisit CDGC to see if it's up to snuff as the default GC. It
already supports precise scanning, so perhaps the rest
"Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
news:mailman.2652.1315000476.14074.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> Speaking of websites issues, can anyone else confirm that copy/pasting
> code snippets from dpl.org doesn't copy the newlines properly when
> pasting into a text editor? I mean neither LF nor CR
Kenji Hara:
> I have posted pull request to fix BigInt's formatting with writef(ln)
> <- formattedWrite().
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/230
You are doing good work! I hope to see your patches in the final release of DMD
2.055!
Bye,
bearophile
Speaking of websites issues, can anyone else confirm that copy/pasting
code snippets from dpl.org doesn't copy the newlines properly when
pasting into a text editor? I mean neither LF nor CRLF is pasted.
On the dmars.com site the snippets can be copied normally.
On 9/2/11, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:11:50 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
> wrote:
>
>> So maybe this type of conversion is impossible in the first place due
>> to how arguments are passed?
>
> Yes. The default value is pushed on the stack at the call site.
Yeah, I should have t
2011/8/31 Jonathan M Davis :
> Unfortunately however, the proposal seems to have gone nowhere thus far. Until
> it does, pretty much every object is just going to use toString without
> parameters, and the problems with BigInt's toString remain. However, if the
> proposal actually gets implemented,
On 9/2/11 2:15 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:07:29 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Don't know why I never brought this up until now, but...
I know how much Andrei loves justified text, but maybe, just maybe,
it's not
such a great idea on the website's sidebar menu?:
http
On 9/2/11 2:07 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Don't know why I never brought this up until now, but...
I know how much Andrei loves justified text, but maybe, just maybe, it's not
such a great idea on the website's sidebar menu?:
http://www.semitwist.com/download/img/shots/dpl--justified-is-pretty-
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.v063sazxtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:07:29 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Don't know why I never brought this up until now, but...
>>
>> I know how much Andrei loves justified text, but maybe, just maybe, it's
>> not
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:11:50 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
So maybe this type of conversion is impossible in the first place due
to how arguments are passed?
Yes. The default value is pushed on the stack at the call site.
I don't know all the technical tidbits,
but from a user's point of
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:07:29 +0300, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Don't know why I never brought this up until now, but...
I know how much Andrei loves justified text, but maybe, just maybe, it's
not
such a great idea on the website's sidebar menu?:
http://www.semitwist.com/download/img/shots/dpl
Code:
void main()
{
auto foo = (int x = 10){ /* */ };
void delegate() bar = foo;
}
Since foo takes an argument that already has a default it can be used
as a simple `void delegate()`, so maybe it makes sense for `foo` to be
able to implicitly convert to such a type.
Unfortunately doing a
Don't know why I never brought this up until now, but...
I know how much Andrei loves justified text, but maybe, just maybe, it's not
such a great idea on the website's sidebar menu?:
http://www.semitwist.com/download/img/shots/dpl--justified-is-pretty-and-easy-to-read.png
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:55:38 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
>
>> I am starting in a new job on Monday, in which the primary programming
>> language is C++. For the past four years I've had the privilege of
>> being able to use D both
On 2011-09-02 19:16, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/2/11, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Note that to!string and/or write(f)(ln) could be implemented to inspect
the fields and just print them in some standard format. This would allow
you to skip implementing toString/writeTo in simple cases like the above.
Zhang:
> Project url: https://bitbucket.org/heromyth/scintillad
> Current status: Not runnable, but compilable and debuggable.
Have you found something in D/Phobos that has caused you troubles? After your
experience do you desire something in D/Phobos to be different?
Bye,
bearophile
"zhang" wrote in message
news:mailman.2638.1314964940.14074.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> ScintillaD is a D port of Scintilla which is implemented in C++.
>
> Scintilla is an excellent editing component.
>
> The GUI toolkit which ScintillaD lies on is WindowsApi on Windows.
>
> The ScintillaD'
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:17:02 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 06:15 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:04:08 -0400, Timon Gehr
wrote:
2. the format parameter should be completely optional in the signature.
This is probably impossible. Just for the object case alo
On Sep 1, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:46:32 -0400, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> Yup. I want to revisit CDGC to see if it's up to snuff as the default GC. It
>> already supports precise scanning, so perhaps the rest can be sorted via
>> library code: create!T(...)
>
On 09/02/2011 06:15 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:04:08 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The sink type could be aliased. But this is really getting into minor
issues :) The amount of power and performance you get by switch
On 9/2/11, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Note that to!string and/or write(f)(ln) could be implemented to inspect
> the fields and just print them in some standard format. This would allow
> you to skip implementing toString/writeTo in simple cases like the above.
http://codepad.org/1PZY7YTX
But I'm pr
On 09/02/2011 04:47 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 02.09.2011, 14:54 Uhr, schrieb Robert Jacques :
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:58:07 -0400, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 9/1/11 8:45 PM, Don wrote:
While on this bikeshedding issue -- the name 'regionallocator' is
horribly long for such an important object
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:04:08 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The sink type could be aliased. But this is really getting into minor
issues :) The amount of power and performance you get by switching to
writeTo is well worth the extra parameters.
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:46:19 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:59 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:53 -0400, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:29 AM, Don wrote:
If you're concerned about speed, the writeTo method is much quicker,
since it doesn't requ
On 09/02/2011 03:47 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:09:30 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/01/2011 10:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:26:55 -0400, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 09/01/2011 09:41 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.08.2011 14:35, Timon Gehr wrote:
On
On 09/02/2011 03:59 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:53 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:29 AM, Don wrote:
If you're concerned about speed, the writeTo method is much quicker,
since it doesn't require any heap activity at all.
allocating a new string on
Am 02.09.2011, 16:08 Uhr, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic
:
On 9/2/11, Walter Bright wrote:
On Windows, we should just stick with the Windows CopyFile function:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363851(v=vs.85).aspx
And let the MS guys do their thing. Presumably they will do what works
b
Am 02.09.2011, 14:54 Uhr, schrieb Robert Jacques :
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:58:07 -0400, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 9/1/11 8:45 PM, Don wrote:
While on this bikeshedding issue -- the name 'regionallocator' is
horribly long for such an important object. I think if it stays with a
long-winded n
Very, very cool! It builds lightning fast here.
What's stopping it from running though? Have you ran into bugs or does
the port need more work?
On 9/2/11, Walter Bright wrote:
> On Windows, we should just stick with the Windows CopyFile function:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363851(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> And let the MS guys do their thing. Presumably they will do what works best
> on
> Windows.
>
I've given OP's code a few te
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:43:38 -0400, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"Timon Gehr" wrote in message
news:j3q9o4$j3k$1...@digitalmars.com...
BTW, any suggestions for a name for a function like this? I can't
think
of a good
one.
Best suited would be 'New', but that would probably be against Phobos
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:53 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/02/2011 03:29 AM, Don wrote:
If you're concerned about speed, the writeTo method is much quicker,
since it doesn't require any heap activity at all.
allocating a new string on the heap always requires heap activity. I was
bench
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:09:30 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/01/2011 10:57 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:26:55 -0400, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 09/01/2011 09:41 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.08.2011 14:35, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/31/2011 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Obje
"Timon Gehr" wrote in message
news:j3q9o4$j3k$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> BTW, any suggestions for a name for a function like this? I can't think
>> of a good
>> one.
>>
>
> Best suited would be 'New', but that would probably be against Phobos
> naming conventions (we could add an exception fo
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:58:07 -0400, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 9/1/11 8:45 PM, Don wrote:
While on this bikeshedding issue -- the name 'regionallocator' is
horribly long for such an important object. I think if it stays with a
long-winded name, it won't be used as frequently as it deserves.
I
ScintillaD is a D port of Scintilla which is implemented in C++.
Scintilla is an excellent editing component.
The GUI toolkit which ScintillaD lies on is WindowsApi on Windows.
The ScintillaD's APIs are almost identical with Scintilla's.
The changes to APIs are done mainly in order to use the pr
On 09/02/2011 03:29 AM, Don wrote:
On 01.09.2011 23:35, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/01/2011 11:15 PM, kennytm wrote:
Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/01/2011 09:41 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.08.2011 14:35, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/31/2011 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Objects would have writeTo and toStrin
On 09/02/2011 06:20 AM, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
== Quote from Timon Gehr (timon.g...@gmx.ch)'s article
Allocating a class or struct instance with a given allocator seems not
to be part of the standard allocator interface. Why is that?
Pure oversight.
On Friday, September 02, 2011 04:58:46 zeljkog wrote:
> Marco Leise Wrote:
> > void main(string[] args)
> > {
> >
> > if (!enforce(args.length == 3, {
> >
> > stderr.writefln("%s SOURCE DEST", args[0]);
> >
> > })) return;
> >
> > auto sw = StopWatch();
>
On 9/1/2011 1:13 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
I split the discussion with Andrei about the benefit of a multi-threaded file
copy routine to its own thread.
This is about copying a file from and to the same HDD - a mechanical disk with
seek times.
On Windows, we should just stick with the Windows Copy
Marco Leise Wrote:
>
> void main(string[] args)
> {
> if (!enforce(args.length == 3, {
> stderr.writefln("%s SOURCE DEST", args[0]);
> })) return;
>
> auto sw = StopWatch();
> sw.start();
>
> auto src = new MmFile(args[1], MmFile.Mode.Read, 0, null, 0);
> a
Marco Leise wrote:
>I split the discussion with Andrei about the benefit of a
>multi-threaded file copy routine to its own thread.
>This is about copying a file from and to the same HDD - a mechanical
>disk with seek times.
>
>My testing showed that Andrei is correct with the assumption that the
50 matches
Mail list logo
