On 11/22/2011 08:16 AM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
bcs wrote:
How many people in the D community have the experience and know-how to
review the security of an implementation? If there are less than 2 or 3
people who can do that, can we afford to include native kernels? We
can't have just one and if
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 07:58:19 +1300, NMS wrote:
Is there a D parser written in D? - C strings kill me.
Thanks, NMS
SDC[1] has one, but it's being lazy loaded in -- that is, it's not
complete.
[1]:http://github.com/bhelyer/SDC
Walter Bright writes:
> On 11/22/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> - Can we slowly start to acquire DWARF-3/4?
>
> Dwarf 2 is good enough, so why do 3/4?
>
>> - Why were extensions chosen over say representing an array as two field
>> struct?
>
> Because it is presumably harder to get a debug
"Martin Nowak" writes:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:18:47 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the extensions
> under
Andrei Alexandrescu writes:
> On 11/20/11 7:09 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> - The code sample at the top is terrible, the equivalent C is only a
>> couple of lines longer and it doesn't show off any of what makes D
>> better! Admittedly you're limited in what you can do here as the code
>> needs
On 11/25/11 11:30 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
On 11/25/2011 06:52 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
As I wrote, on OSX the definitions do link so they exist.
Andrei
Are you defining the variables or referencing them?
extern(C) int x; means definition and of course it will link because it
is you who
Is there a D parser written in D? - C strings kill me.
Thanks, NMS
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:22:34 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
After going astray while doing C++ class bindings using smart_ptrs and
ugly
mixins I think I found a really neat way.
It consists of a C++ header that defines a d_new template function.
It will allocate it's types from the D GC while hoo
There are several changes in Ada 2012, among them there is the introduction of
Contract Programming, and one of its sub-features is the Old (prestate):
http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai05s/ai05-0145-2.txt?rev=1.8
A general short introduction to the differences of Ada 2012:
http://www
There's an edge-case here to be aware of, if you don't reference the
symbol there won't be linker errors (at least with optlink, and this
makes sense when you think about it):
// no linker errors
extern extern(C) int x;
void main() { }
// linker errors
extern extern(C) int x;
void main() { int z
Steve Teale Wrote:
> So one question is where should such implementations go?
github?
> Another questions relates to the definition of interfaces at module
> level. We have interfaces that go hand-in-hand with classes built in
> to the language. But if I wanted to say that two sql interface modu
On 11/25/2011 06:52 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
As I wrote, on OSX the definitions do link so they exist.
Andrei
Are you defining the variables or referencing them?
extern(C) int x; means definition and of course it will link because it
is you who defines the variable.
extern extern(C)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:38:03 -0600
Jude Young <10equa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please, learn the language as you go!
OK.
> And post random questions to D.learn that make you look like an idiot.
Will do!
> That's how REAL men learn a language!
Thank
On 11/25/11 10:00 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
On 11/25/2011 05:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/25/11 8:55 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
__gshared extern extern(C) int __argc;
That doesn't link.
Andrei
It links correctly on windows for me and linux doesn't have the
variables defined. Are you su
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:28:27 -0600
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Close and getting closer.
So, some things are not implemented (yet), but no obsolete ones?
> Here's the errata:
> http://erdani.com/tdpl/errata/
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
When your intelligence has passed out of the dense
On 2011-11-25 13:27, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
Hm, I expected this would work:
extern(C) int __argc;
extern(C) char** __argv;
The symbols do exist at least on OSX (no linker error) but
On 11/25/2011 05:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/25/11 8:55 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
__gshared extern extern(C) int __argc;
That doesn't link.
Andrei
It links correctly on windows for me and linux doesn't have the
variables defined. Are you sure they are not windows-specific?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2011 09:17 AM, Gour wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In order to be able to help in any way build D's ecosystem, I have
> to learn the language. :-)
>
> Picked my TDPL copy from the shelf yesterday, went through the 1st
> chapter, but wonder how does TD
On 11/25/11 9:17 AM, Gour wrote:
Hello!
In order to be able to help in any way build D's ecosystem, I have to
learn the language. :-)
Picked my TDPL copy from the shelf yesterday, went through the 1st
chapter, but wonder how does TDPL stand in comparison with today's D
(before jumping further)?
On 11/25/11 8:55 AM, Max Samukha wrote:
__gshared extern extern(C) int __argc;
That doesn't link.
Andrei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2011 09:15 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:55:15 +0100, Max Samukha
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
Is there an easy way to turn D style (strin
Hello!
In order to be able to help in any way build D's ecosystem, I have to
learn the language. :-)
Picked my TDPL copy from the shelf yesterday, went through the 1st
chapter, but wonder how does TDPL stand in comparison with today's D
(before jumping further)?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
In the mat
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:55:15 +0100, Max Samukha wrote:
On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
Hm, I expected this would work:
extern(C) int __argc;
extern(C) char** __argv;
On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
Hm, I expected this would work:
extern(C) int __argc;
extern(C) char** __argv;
The symbols do exist at least on OSX (no linker error) b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2011 06:27 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C
>> style?
>
> Hm, I expected this would work:
>
> extern(C) int __argc; extern(C) char** __argv
On 11/25/11 2:13 AM, Jude Young wrote:
Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
Hm, I expected this would work:
extern(C) int __argc;
extern(C) char** __argv;
The symbols do exist at least on OSX (no linker error) but they are both
zero, so apparently druntime doesn
Gour wrote:
So don't generate code, use XRC resources instead ?
wxD can use XRC files?
It would be great, then we can use some of the builders like
DialogBlocks/wxForms...
See the "Xrc" demo in Samples, for some example code.
http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_xrcoverview.html
--anders
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:24:02 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Drop D1, drop Tango, and make DMD the default compiler syntax
> (possibly using gdmd or ldmd behind the covers, where desired)
+1
> It would just generate a Makefile anyway ? But if it could
> generate the IDE projects, then maybe i
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:51:19 +0100
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 11/25/11, Gour wrote:
> > Huh, does it fall in the category of 'language bindings' ? :-)
>
> Or maybe I didn't get the joke? Hehe
;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body,
from boyhood to y
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:07:45 +0100
Anders F Björklund wrote:
> So don't generate code, use XRC resources instead ?
wxD can use XRC files?
It would be great, then we can use some of the builders like
DialogBlocks/wxForms...
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One who restrains his senses, keeping them under
Gour wrote:
And pick one "make" (GNU).
That's not fully clear to me.
Instead of doing separate GNUmakefile and Makefile, and synching those ?
There was even a build.brf and dsss.conf, while those were in fashion...
Trying to support two languages, two libraries, two+ compilers,
two+ buildt
On 11/25/11, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> Well the cool thing is I can use wxGlide to generate C++ code, and
>> convert that to D. I tried it just now and it seems to work, but
>> converting everything by hand is a bit of a chore.
>
> So don't generate code, use XRC resour
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Well the cool thing is I can use wxGlide to generate C++ code, and
convert that to D. I tried it just now and it seems to work, but
converting everything by hand is a bit of a chore.
So don't generate code, use XRC resources instead ?
However even though D is C++ inspir
Walter Bright wrote:
Now that DMD has broken the ABI on x86_64,
??
... compared with GDC, that was.
Think we discussed this earlier, it's about the
passing of structs as parameters compared with C++.
The code is passing a D "string" to the C++ side,
and then interpreting this C argument as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
also more success!!
//This wouldn't work before...
- --
time (mpirun -np 5 -v hello_d)
Hello, world, I am 1 of 5
Hello, world, I am 4 of 5
Hello, world, I am 2 of 5
Hello, world, I am 5 of 5
Hello, world, I am 3 of 5
r
On Fri 25 Nov 2011 03:12:34 AM CST, bearophile wrote:
> Jude Young:
>
>> Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
>
> Maybe something like this (not tested)?
> const int argc = args.length;
> const char** argv = array(map!toStringz(args)).ptr;
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
>
...w
Also, execve/execvpe passes the environment as well. It should be
cross-platform if I'm not mistaken.
Taken with modifications from std.process.execv:
import core.stdc.stdlib;
import std.string;
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
const(char)** argsToC(in string[] argv)
{
auto _argv = cast(const(char)**)malloc((char*).sizeof * (1 + argv.length));
toAStringz(argv, _argv);
return _argv;
On 2011-11-25 09:13, Jude Young wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so I finally got mpi.h to compile and link with D.
A few problems are left to fix, like the fact that I didn't realize
that OpenMPI does not care about the types, unless you are building it...
Anyways appl
Jude Young:
> Is there an easy way to turn D style (string[] args) into C style?
Maybe something like this (not tested)?
const int argc = args.length;
const char** argv = array(map!toStringz(args)).ptr;
Bye,
bearophile
As in the initial discussions on database interfaces, I am still of
the view that such support should be provided at three levels. I also
suggest that we adopt a proposal that was hinted at in the initial
discussions, and think in the longer term of having components that
are devoted to SQL, and th
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:09:41 -0500, Kagamin wrote:
>
> It seems this has no connection to columns whatsoever. Whatever data you
> receive from server, it's type is encoded in the received data packet.
> One may want to match types exactly or do sensible conversions like
> round a float to int or p
Sean,
I accidentally deleted your post, and in Pan I don't know how to get it
back.
Yes, most of the API's support that nominal capability, but what they
tell you may not be what you expect, especially with ODBC.
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so I finally got mpi.h to compile and link with D.
A few problems are left to fix, like the fact that I didn't realize
that OpenMPI does not care about the types, unless you are building it...
Anyways applied a temp fix and got the first program
44 matches
Mail list logo
