2012/1/1 Gour g...@atmarama.net
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800
bls bizp...@orange.fr wrote:
A Database independent, ORM based library module is not even matter of
discussion. That's a pity.
That would be nice, indeed.
Well for us Windoze is the only interesting Desktop platform.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
I used GitStats to gather some statistics on DMD. My favorites:
Age - 932 days, 598 active days (64.16%)
Total Files - 1_016
Total Lines of Code - 328_727 (525_735
So, I'm a function `f`, I have an `immutable(type)[]` argument and I
want to store it for my friend `g` in an TLS variable `v`:
---
string v;
debug string sure;
void f(string s) { v = s; debug sure = s.idup; }
void g() { assert(v == sure); }
---
I also store a copy of `s` into `sure` for my
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 02:22:59 -0600
Jimmy Cao jcao...@gmail.com wrote:
GUI library for Windows. Pretty easy to use.
Thank you, but not interesting for us looking for multi-platform
library.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Those persons who execute their duties according to My injunctions
and who follow
Meh, I'd still prefer it be an array of UTF-8 code /points/ represented
by an array of bytes (which are the UTF-8 code units).
By saying you want an array of code points you already define
representation. And if you want that there already is dchar[]. You probably
meant a range of code points
Happy New Year - from New Zealand! :-D
A happy new year!
from Japan
Kenji Hara
2012/1/1 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I think
that on some level, the unit test framework in the language has failed if
we have to add library solutions on top of it to get such basic
functionality.
That's what we are saying: The unit test framework fails for us and a
library solution is perfectly
01.01.2012 8:34, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
Happy new year from Russia!
It's OT. This post should be in D.announce NG titled:
A year have rev. 2012 now. Everybody is switched to this revision
automatically.
With the following text:
Somebody is telling it's
On 01/01/2012 08:17 AM, Don wrote:
On 31.12.2011 16:26, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/31/2011 12:13 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.12.2011 02:27, so wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:40:24 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think: there are cases when named parameters are beneficial. There
are cases where
On 01/01/2012 10:40 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
So, I'm a function `f`, I have an `immutable(type)[]` argument and I
want to store it for my friend `g` in an TLS variable `v`:
---
string v;
debug string sure;
void f(string s) { v = s; debug sure = s.idup; }
void g() { assert(v == sure); }
---
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D handles it, you
might write this:
char[] str;
... load str ...
for ( int i = 0; i str.length; i++ )
{
font.render(str[i]); // Ewww.
...
}
That actually looks like a bug that might happen in
On 01/01/2012 08:10 AM, Don wrote:
On 31.12.2011 17:13, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/31/2011 01:15 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.12.2011 01:56, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/31/2011 01:12 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/30/11 6:07 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
alias std.string.representation raw;
I meant your
On 2011-12-31 21:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, what would be so wrong if the unit tests for the standard library
displayed a nice report when finished?
My primary issue here is that I don't think that we should be adding stuff
On 2011-12-31 21:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 15:48:16 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Yes but what happens when there are many failed tests, i.e. may
AssertErrors that have been thrown? It will just print all after each
other and you have to count them yourself if you want
On 2011-12-31 22:01, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:04:12 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be possible to implement named unit tests only in library code.
It would not have as nice syntax as if it was implemented in the
language but still possible.
In Ruby on Rails I
On 2012-01-01 01:57, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan M Davisjmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I
On 29/12/11 5:13 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm currently trying to make a nongc safe version of the d-runtime and
stumbeled on my favorite WTF moment so far:
The following programm:
struct MemoryBlockInfo
{
size_t size;
long[10] backtrace;
int backtraceSize;
this(size_t size)
{
this.size =
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:34:29 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
And from Tanzania - D community come and visit ;=)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:28:43 -0800, bls wrote:
Not yet available. In case that Steve Teale (and he did a dammed
good Job, as well as Piotr) will add std.database this will not change
the situation significantly. 'Cause std.database will contain just
rudimentary DB support.. A Database
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D handles it, you
might write this:
char[] str;
... load str ...
for ( int i = 0; i str.length; i++ )
{
font.render(str[i]); // Ewww.
...
}
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D handles it, you
might write this:
char[] str;
... load str ...
for ( int i = 0; i str.length; i++ )
{
On 31.12.2011 16:58, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/31/2011 12:51 PM, Don wrote:
On 2011-12-27 23:27, Timon Gehr wrote:
In case the function is used for code generation, it can get
rid of one level of indentation.
string generate(string x) = mixin(X!q{
@(x) = 2;
});
That just makes it look even
On 31-12-2011 23:28, dsimcha wrote:
I have a plan to avoid the GC lock for most small (1 page) GC
allocations. I hope to have a pull request within a week or two, in time
for the next release. There's one detail I need clarified by Sean,
Walter or someone who designed the D GC.
Currently small
On 01.01.2012 09:40, Caligo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org mailto:seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
to the entire D community!
Andrei
I used GitStats to gather some statistics on DMD. My favorites:
Age - 932 days, 598
On 31.12.2011 15:55, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 29.12.2011, 09:16 Uhr, schrieb Don nos...@nospam.com:
On 28.12.2011 13:14, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/28/2011 10:53 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 27/12/11 8:40 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/27/11 2:38 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/27/2011
On 01/01/2012 04:39 PM, Don wrote:
On 31.12.2011 16:58, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/31/2011 12:51 PM, Don wrote:
On 2011-12-27 23:27, Timon Gehr wrote:
In case the function is used for code generation, it can get
rid of one level of indentation.
string generate(string x) = mixin(X!q{
@(x) = 2;
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 04:28:45 UTC, bls wrote:
WEB Development is for sure doable in D, reusable Frameworks
are nevertheless AFAIK not available.
What kind of features did you have in mind for this?
On 01/01/2012 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D handles it, you
might write this:
char[] str;
... load str ...
for ( int i =
On 01/01/2012 08:01 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D handles it, you
might write this:
char[]
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:28:09 +0100, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a plan to avoid the GC lock for most small (1 page) GC
allocations. I hope to have a pull request within a week or two, in
time for the next release. There's one detail I need clarified by Sean,
Walter or someone
Just a small tip for those people, who use following code style:
if( cond ) {
body
} else {
body
}
I've found it very convenient to attach unittest block to my function
declatarions in a same way:
private int find_pos_divisor( int first, int second ) {
int temp;
while( second ) {
Le 31/12/2011 19:13, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 12/31/2011 06:32 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 12/30/2011 05:27 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:36 PM, deadalnix wrote:
The #1 quality of a programmer is to act like he/she is a morron.
Because sometime we all are morrons.
The #1 quality of a
On 01/01/2012 11:36 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 31/12/2011 19:13, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 12/31/2011 06:32 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 12/30/2011 05:27 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/30/2011 10:36 PM, deadalnix wrote:
The #1 quality of a programmer is to act like he/she is a morron.
Because sometime we
Am 01.01.2012 23:16, schrieb Mail Mantis:
Just a small tip for those people, who use following code style:
if( cond ) {
body
} else {
body
}
I've found it very convenient to attach unittest block to my function
declatarions in a same way:
private int find_pos_divisor( int first, int
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:35:00 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ok, if you would rather have all this in the language I would say no do
that. But I know other people in the community that usually prefer to do
a library solution if possible.
If all we're talking about is named unit tests and running
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:32:34 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 21:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 15:48:16 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Yes but what happens when there are many failed tests, i.e. may
AssertErrors that have been thrown? It will just print all
On 01/01/2012 02:25 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:01 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you haven't been educated about unicode or how D
Mail Mantis:
private int find_pos_divisor( int first, int second ) {
int temp;
while( second ) {
temp = second;
second = first % second;
first = temp;
}
return abs( first );
} unittest {
assert( find_pos_divisor ( 10, 20 ) == 10 );
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:31:18 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What's wrong with being able to run the unit tests from your editor,
have the unit test framework output HTML (or similar), displayed in your
editor and then you can click on links in the stack trace to get to the
source code. If you
On Monday, January 02, 2012 00:16:18 Mail Mantis wrote:
Just a small tip for those people, who use following code style:
if( cond ) {
body
} else {
body
}
I've found it very convenient to attach unittest block to my function
declatarions in a same way:
private int
On 01/02/2012 12:16 AM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 02:25 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:01 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 05:53 AM, Chad J wrote:
If you
2012/1/2 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
And I find that style to be seriously harming readability (braces should
always
be on their own line IMHO), but I guess that if you like it, it makes
sense.
- Jonathan M Davis
I understand your point, but don't share it - since tabulation
On 12/29/2011 10:16 AM, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 16:00:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 15:58:55 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
What's the stance on using C++11 features in the dmd source code in
the future?
Well, how many C++11 features does DMC
2012/1/2 Sean Cavanaugh worksonmymach...@gmail.com
On 12/29/2011 10:16 AM, Trass3r wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 16:00:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 15:58:55 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
What's the stance on using C++11 features in the dmd source code
On 1/1/2012 4:30 PM, Mail Mantis wrote:
As for D - it already natively
supports many C++11 features(or vise-versa), but I wonder if the user-defined
literals will ever make into it.
With CTFE D has far better than user defined literals.
2012/1/2 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
On 1/1/2012 4:30 PM, Mail Mantis wrote:
As for D - it already natively
supports many C++11 features(or vise-versa), but I wonder if the
user-defined
literals will ever make into it.
With CTFE D has far better than user defined literals.
On Monday, January 02, 2012 01:40:30 Mail Mantis wrote:
2012/1/2 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
And I find that style to be seriously harming readability (braces should
always
be on their own line IMHO), but I guess that if you like it, it makes
sense.
- Jonathan M Davis
I
On 01/01/2012 06:36 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/02/2012 12:16 AM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 02:25 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:01 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/01/2012 04:13 PM, Chad J wrote:
On 01/01/2012 07:59 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On
On Monday, 2 January 2012 at 01:14:43 UTC, Mail Mantis wrote:
If I undestood you correctly...
Potentially, yes, But, from syntactical point of view, is there
any [...]
http://drdobbs.com/blogs/tools/229401068
In std.conv, the octal template is one example:
int a = octal!755;
Another thing
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
dmd -run test
-- killed by signal 11
Is this a regression or a problem with my setup (DMD 2.057 on Ubuntu
11.10 64
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
dmd -run test
-- killed by signal 11
Is
Am 02.01.2012 02:51, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
dmd -run test
-- killed by signal 11
Is this a regression or a problem with
Am 02.01.2012 03:07, schrieb Joshua Reusch:
Am 02.01.2012 02:51, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
dmd -run test
-- killed by signal
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Joshua Reusch yos...@arkandos.de wrote:
Am 02.01.2012 02:51, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
On 01/02/2012 03:02 AM, Caligo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int
On 2 January 2012 02:51, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
Is this a regression or a problem with my setup (DMD 2.057 on Ubuntu 11.10
64 bit)?
Can anyone reproduce this?
I get an assert error. Using DMD 2.057 and Arch Linux, but on 32 bit. So I
assume that might be it?
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:23:00 +0100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:02 AM, Caligo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:20:36 +1100, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
The placement of braces is very much a matter of personal preference.
I suspect that any given piece of source code is read far more often by
people that didn't write it. So personal code writing preferences
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:51:20 +1100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On my machine, the following program causes an access violation in
druntime instead of throwing an AssertError.
module test;
void foo(int x){assert(x);}
void main(){foo(0);}
dmd -run test
-- killed by signal 11
Is
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:36:37 +1100, Derek ddparn...@bigpond.com wrote:
Can anyone reproduce this?
May I did have one too many beers today ...
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
On 01/02/2012 04:36 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:23:00 +0100, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/02/2012 03:02 AM, Caligo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On my machine, the following program causes
Progress status at the end of 2011.
Issue 3235 - [tdpl] Function literals must be deduced as function or
delegateIssue 5605 - [tdpl] foreach with ranges doesn't support
opSlice()Issue 6714 - [tdpl] Type inference for parameters of function
and delegate literalsIssue 7133 - [tdpl] There should be
Progress status at the end of 2011.
Issue 3235 - [tdpl] Function literals must be deduced as function or
delegateIssue 5605 - [tdpl] foreach with ranges doesn't support
opSlice()
Issue 6714 - [tdpl] Type inference for parameters of function and
delegate literals
Issue 7133 - [tdpl] There should
D's definitions of is and == have so much redundency. That might
indicate some flaw. If references and values (for classes and arrays)
could be clearly distinguished in the syntax, the is operator is not
necessary at all.
A related thing is element-wise operation. Consider
string[] a;
string[] b;
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 22:18:05 UTC, Mail Mantis wrote:
Just a small tip for those people, who use following code style:
if( cond ) {
body
} else {
body
}
I've found it very convenient to attach unittest block to my
function
declatarions in a same way:
private int find_pos_divisor(
On 2012-01-02 00:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:31:18 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What's wrong with being able to run the unit tests from your editor,
have the unit test framework output HTML (or similar), displayed in your
editor and then you can click on links in the
On 2012-01-02 00:14, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:35:00 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ok, if you would rather have all this in the language I would say no do
that. But I know other people in the community that usually prefer to do
a library solution if possible.
If all we're
On 01-Jan-12 3:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 00:50, Joel Christensen wrote:
I've got an Mac with OSX. But I have a few problems with using it with D.
1. I haven't got any media programming going.
Could you please elaborate. Derelict is a library that contains bindings
for
On 1/1/2012 7:38 PM, Joel Christensen wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 3:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 00:50, Joel Christensen wrote:
I've got an Mac with OSX. But I have a few problems with using it
with D.
1. I haven't got any media programming going.
Could you please elaborate. Derelict
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 11:54:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Personally, I think wrappers are a waste of time, but some
people prefer them to using a C API directly.
I agree for wrappers that mindlessly provide a different syntax
for the same functionality, but wrappers can take advantage of
On 14/12/11 9:21 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/14/2011 09:14 PM, Justin Whear wrote:
I've looked through std.algorithm and std.range, but haven't found
anything
to compute the Cartesian product of several ranges. I have the nagging
feeling that this can be accomplished by combining several of the
On 31/12/2011 13:34, Trass3r wrote:
Basically it was deprecated because it's poorly defined and implemented.
snip
Would you care to elaborate? Moreover, if that's the only reason then
why not improve it rather than getting rid of it?
There are several types of typedefs that need to be
On 1/2/2012 6:10 AM, Joel Christensen wrote:
Thanks very much Mike. I guess I've got a bit of a wrapper over a binding.
I'll look more into Derelict for Mac OSX.
If it's DerelictAllegro you're using, then you need to know this.
Derelict loads libraries manually (via dlopen on Posix systems).
On Sunday, 1 January 2012 at 11:54:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 1/1/2012 7:38 PM, Joel Christensen wrote:
On 01-Jan-12 3:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 00:50, Joel Christensen wrote:
I've got an Mac with OSX. But I have a few problems with
using it
with D.
1. I haven't got any
[snip]
I seem to get SDL to work, but not OpenGL. I copied it's frame
work from system some where to another frameworks place. I've
got XCode installed.
Hmm. I had a go at another test program I found and got it
working.
Graphics with D on OSX, so now that's Windows, Ubuntu, and now
OSX.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7187
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3448
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3448
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__traits(compiles) returns |__traits(compiles)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3616
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7193
Summary: Regression(2.058head): ICE: delete lambda expression
crashes dmd
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=965
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7193
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7194
Summary: [CTFE] Incorrect behaviour with pointers as local
struct variable fields
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5103
Nick Treleaven ntrel-pub...@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7135
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-01 05:56:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
One more thing - the example in the book reads:
obj.addMethod(sayHello,
Variant(Dynamic, Variant[]...) {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7190
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-01 06:37:02 PST ---
This is a forward reference bug.
Workaround in core/Model.d:
class SqlitePersister(T) {
+static assert(T.sizeof); // force running semantic of T
+
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7190
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2411
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2411
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-01 08:31:04 PST ---
My patch requires explicit 'ref'.
void main() {
S s;
// foreach(element; s.tupleof) // doesn't work
foreach(ref element; s.tupleof) // OK
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7169
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5467
Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7195
Summary: remove in std.algorithm documentation quick links goes
to wrong remove
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7195
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7195
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6017
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@gnuk.net
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Comment #36 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2012-01-01 16:04:19
PST ---
And the most voted bug from all times (41 votes, the next most voted have 28
votes) finally get fixed.
Thanks for the persistence, ckamm!!! :)
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6170
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1001|application/octet-stream|text/plain
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #990|application/octet-stream|text/plain
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
