On 2012-05-12 20:30, Mehrdad wrote:
Yes, that's not a WinForms thing -- when you close a window, it's
trivial to have DestroyWindow() get called too.
The trouble is that you can't rely on this to avoid handle leaks -- for
example, message-only windows are invisible, so their handles can get
lea
On 2012-05-12 21:37, tim krimm wrote:
Is anyone here familiar with the XOMB operating system?
http://wiki.xomb.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
It appears to be written in D.
http://wiki.xomb.org/index.php?title=History_of_XOmB
"XOmB originally came about as a joke. Our group wanted to learn
the
On 14 May 2012 09:16, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> Than try to load it:
>> HINSTANCE LoadME;
>> LoadME = LoadLibrary(L"C:\\Users\\**CrashTUA\\Documents\\visual studio
>> 2010\\Projects\\DynamicLib1\\**DynamicLib1\\Release\\**DynamicLib1.dll");
>> func dllprintt;
>> dllprintt = (func)GetProcAddress(Lo
On 2012-05-11 22:20, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That's definitely an example of something that depends on your background.
std.algorithm.any does _exactly_ what it would do in a functional language.
How intuitive an API is depends a lot on how much the person writing the API
thinks like you. It's d
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 06:27:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/13/2012 11:09 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
(1) Compiler helps you write correct multithreaded code
(2) You help compiler perform optimizations based on contracts
(3) I don't think there exists a #3 that's very different from
#1 and #2
#3
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 06:27:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
#3 Improves self-documentation of code - it's more
understandable and less susceptible to breakage during
maintenance.
#3 is also valid for C++, so I wasn't exactly considering that.
#4 Improves encapsulation
o.O How does it impr
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 07:26:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You always call "display.dispose" at the end of the main
function. Since "dispose" will dispose all of the receiver's
children and "display" is the top level widget, everything will
be disposed when the application exits.
*sigh* I
On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 23:27:15 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
You know, my project consisting of 130-ish source files and
24.000-ish lines of code compiles from scratch in ~20 seconds
on my machine, building one file at a time... I honestly have
not managed to come up with a build syst
LoadLibrary returns 10(maybe wrong number of zeros,i dont
remember exactly:)). And GetProcAddress returns 0, so dllprintt
fails:(
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 20:36:47 UTC, sunny_side wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 21:52:00 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
Does anyone have it compiled for Linux 32 bits ?
It has been compiled for Debian 6, 32 bit. I didn't remember
any significant problems with compilation except several hung
up, bu
On 5/13/12, Kiith-Sa <4...@theanswer.com> wrote:
> My D:YAML library (YAML parser) depends on std.stream
Also ae.xml depends on it.
On 14-05-2012 08:37, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/13/2012 10:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
I have yet to see any compiler make sensible use of the information
provided by
both C++'s const and D's const.
D's const is part of purity, which is optimizable.
A function can still be weakly pure a
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 10:08:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
assumeSorted(range).contains(object)
is still one line, safer, and IMHO more self-explanatory.
It's self-explanatory if the name there contains something like
"binarySearch". Otherwise it is NOT self-explanatory,
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 09:05:51 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 20:36:47 UTC, sunny_side wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 21:52:00 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
Does anyone have it compiled for Linux 32 bits ?
It has been compiled for Debian 6, 32 bit. I didn't remember
any signific
Hi! I have a small question:
Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
This is particularly interesting for strings.
For instance, I could return an empty string from a toString-like function
and the empty string would be printed, but If I returned a null string,
that
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:08:17 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
Hi! I have a small question:
Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
This is particularly interesting for strings.
For instance, I could return an empty string from a toString-like
function
and the
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:08:17 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
Hi! I have a small question:
Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
This is particularly interesting for strings.
For instance, I could return an empty string from a toString-like
function
and the
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:01:06 +0200, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 10:08:47 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
assumeSorted(range).contains(object)
is still one line, safer, and IMHO more self-explanatory.
It's self-explanatory if the name there contains somet
On 05/14/12 12:08, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> Hi! I have a small question:
> Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
> This is particularly interesting for strings.
> For instance, I could return an empty string from a toString-like function
> and the empty string wo
So, null arrays and empty arrays are always the same, except for an empty
string, which is a valid non-nill array of characters with length 0, right?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:24 PM, simendsjo wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:08:17 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan <
> gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 13/05/2012 23:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Caching and lazy
evaluation _will_ be impossible in those functions without breaking the type
system.
Unless stuff is added to the type system to accommodate it.
For example, a type modifier that adds a "set" flag. When unset, a const method canno
From the other thread
On 13/05/2012 21:58, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/13/2012 1:48 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 13/05/2012 20:42, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to see std.stream dumped. I don't see any reason for it
to exist that std.stdio doesn't do (or should do).
So std.stdio.File is
On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:34:45 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 12-05-2012 00:22, Mehrdad wrote:
I haven't used git or github much. (Pretty much just once or twice, when
someone added me.)
How do I go about submitting potential changes to Phobos?
(All I see on there is "GIT Read-only" wh
Le 14/05/2012 12:49, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
So, null arrays and empty arrays are always the same, except for an
empty string, which is a valid non-nill array of characters with length
0, right?
If it is the current behavior, it deserve a WAT !
Le 14/05/2012 12:42, FeepingCreature a écrit :
On 05/14/12 12:08, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Hi! I have a small question:
Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
This is particularly interesting for strings.
For instance, I could return an empty string from a toStrin
Alex Rønne Petersen:
In writing unwinding mechanisms for my VM, I find myself
actually needing some sort of @noreturn function attribute that
would tell the compiler that the function does not return,
Maybe Walter will listen you more if you show an example of
where/why you would use @noretu
On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:51:40 +0200, deadalnix wrote:
Le 14/05/2012 12:49, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
So, null arrays and empty arrays are always the same, except for an
empty string, which is a valid non-nill array of characters with length
0, right?
If it is the current behavior, it deserve
On Fri, 11 May 2012 22:28:40 -0400, Mehrdad wrote:
On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 01:38:56 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
I can't tell which part of my code is causing this (there's quite
a few files in my project and I can't really submit every file),
but when I run DMD, it crashes in template.c with
"Acce
On 14-05-2012 14:13, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 14-05-2012 13:53, bearophile wrote:
Alex Rønne Petersen:
In writing unwinding mechanisms for my VM, I find myself actually
needing some sort of @noreturn function attribute that would tell the
compiler that the function does not return,
Mayb
On 14-05-2012 13:53, bearophile wrote:
Alex Rønne Petersen:
In writing unwinding mechanisms for my VM, I find myself actually
needing some sort of @noreturn function attribute that would tell the
compiler that the function does not return,
Maybe Walter will listen you more if you show an exam
On 14-05-2012 13:45, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2012 18:34:45 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 12-05-2012 00:22, Mehrdad wrote:
I haven't used git or github much. (Pretty much just once or twice, when
someone added me.)
How do I go about submitting potential changes to Ph
On Mon, 14 May 2012 02:35:16 -0400, Jakob Ovrum
wrote:
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 17:02:46 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 13/05/2012 17:41, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
I agree with everything but toString(). I'm afraid that forcing
toString() to be const
will have harm flexibility severely.
Alex Rønne Petersen:
But how would you memoize the value in the instance of the
object if it's const?
I opened a thread on such matters:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gtpdmrfektaygfmec...@forum.dlang.org
---
Jonathan M Davis:
Caching and lazy evaluation _will_ be impossible
On Sun, 13 May 2012 16:52:15 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 14.05.2012 0:48, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 13/05/2012 20:42, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to see std.stream dumped. I don't see any reason for it to
exist that std.stdio
doesn't do (or should do).
So std.stdio.File is the rep
void function(Colour c = Colour.white) f;
f.stringof == "void function(Colour c = white)"
Error: undefined identifier 'white'
This is rather hard to work-around. It'll take a lot of time to write code
to magically put 'Colour.' back there...
Is there another way?
I think any kind of null array should be different from an array of zero
length.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:55 PM, simendsjo wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:51:40 +0200, deadalnix wrote:
>
> Le 14/05/2012 12:49, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
>>
>>> So, null arrays and empty arrays are always the sa
deadalnix , dans le message (digitalmars.D:167258), a écrit :
> A good solution would be to set the pointer to 0 when the length is set
> to 0.
String literal are zero-terminated. "" cannot point to 0x0,
unless we drop this rule. Maybe we should...
On 05-05-2012 06:57, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
I don't think the language really makes it clear whether overflows and
underflows are well-defined. Do we guarantee that for any integral type
T, T.max + 1 == T.min and T.min - 1 == T.max?
This is relevant in particular for GDC and LDC since t
I thing the zero-terminated literal shtick is pointless. Literals are
rarely passed to C functions, so we gotta use the std.utf.toUTFz anyway.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Christophe wrote:
> deadalnix , dans le message (digitalmars.D:167258), a écrit :
> > A good solution would be to set th
On 14.05.2012 16:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 16:52:15 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 14.05.2012 0:48, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 13/05/2012 20:42, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to see std.stream dumped. I don't see any reason for it to
exist that std.stdio
doesn't d
On 2012-05-14 10:10, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 07:26:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
You always call "display.dispose" at the end of the main function.
Since "dispose" will dispose all of the receiver's children and
"display" is the top level widget, everything will be disposed when
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 06:04:33 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 03:19:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I suspect that the folks who are looking for absolutely every
CPU cycle and want caching and lazy-loading in their types
It's not a CPU cycle issue.
Caching/lazy-loading can
On 14 May 2012 13:21, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 14-05-2012 14:13, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>>
>> On 14-05-2012 13:53, bearophile wrote:
>>>
>>> Alex Rønne Petersen:
>>>
In writing unwinding mechanisms for my VM, I find myself actually
needing some sort of @noreturn function attri
Hi!
I want to write a web server in D and I wonder what is the best library to
use for it.
--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:39:40 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
Hi!
I want to write a web server in D and I wonder what is the best library
to
use for it.
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d
Thanks for the reply!
This isn't a library. This is a weird framework, which needs me to run my
sources through some executables.
I need a good library with no garbage. Pure D code, that I can merge with
my sources.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:56 PM, simendsjo wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:39:4
I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every single
project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with the
ancient D1.
Is there at least one sane project in there or is dsource.org an ancient
fossil for museum display?
Sorry for my frustration.
--
Bye,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:00:25PM +0400, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> I think any kind of null array should be different from an array of
> zero length.
But that defeats the utility of idioms like:
int[] arr;
arr ~= 123;
...
T
--
There are four kinds of lies: lies, damn l
No, it doesn't. Appending to a null array is equivalent to allocating a new
array.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:00:25PM +0400, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> > I think any kind of null array should be different from an array of
> > zero length.
>
> Bu
web.d by Adam Ruppe?
http://arsdnet.net/web.d/
You just need "web.d" file you can find on github.
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 14:04:01 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Thanks for the reply!
This isn't a library. This is a weird framework, which needs me
to run my
sources through some executables.
I
On Mon, 14 May 2012 06:08:17 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
Hi! I have a small question:
Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
== tests for length and content equivalence.
'is' tests for both pointer and length equivalence (and therefore, content
equalit
On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:09:48 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Yes, I know it can be done much shorter, but to a beginner, the stuff I
listed usually seems less 'magical'.
It's not magical if you don't wonder about it.
For example, setting up origin was a detail I never even thought about
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 14:23:47 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
You just need "web.d" file you can find on github.
cgi.d is the one for a basic server.
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
If you use cgi.d alone, you can use the little
-version=em
On Mon, 14 May 2012 09:20:57 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 14.05.2012 16:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The one last puzzle to solve is sharing. File is this half-breed of
sharing, because it contains a FILE *, which is a shared type, but File
is not. Then it does some casting to get
On Mon, 14 May 2012 10:06:12 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every
single
project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with
the
ancient D1.
Is there at least one sane project in there or is dsource.org an a
ancient D1.
druntime has assembler code, assembler is more ancient than D1,
druntime belongs to D2, so D2 is more ancient than D1. Whoops!
It's a time paradox!
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:38:23 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
This discussion started in the thread "Getting the const-correctness of
Object sorted once and for all", but it deserved its own thread.
These modules suffer from the following problems:
1. poor documentation, dearth of examples & r
For a number of times I've tried building DMD from my github clone and
failed at the same place over and over again.
I say "make -fwin32.mak" and get this:
dmc idgen.c -o idgen
idgen.c:
Msgtable msgtable[] =
^
idgen.c(29) : Error: missing ',' between declaration of 'Msgtable' and
'
On Monday, May 14, 2012 15:27:41 John wrote:
> On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 06:04:33 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
> > On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 03:19:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> I suspect that the folks who are looking for absolutely every
> >> CPU cycle and want caching and lazy-loading in their type
On 05/14/2012 06:10 AM, Chris Cain wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 02:57:57 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
The problem is that it's unavoidable.
i.e. you can't say "don't mark it as const if it isn't const",
because, practically speaking, it's being forced onto the programmers
by the language.
You're r
On Monday, May 14, 2012 14:08:17 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> Hi! I have a small question:
> Is the test for a null array equivalent to a test for zero-length array?
> This is particularly interesting for strings.
> For instance, I could return an empty string from a toString-like function
> and the em
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 16:53:24 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:10 AM, Chris Cain wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 02:57:57 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
The problem is that it's unavoidable.
i.e. you can't say "don't mark it as const if it isn't const",
because, practically speaking, it's be
At least we could make an empty string a null array of characters for
consistency. How many times did anyone use the feature of string literals
being null-terminated?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Monday, May 14, 2012 14:08:17 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> > Hi! I have
On 03.05.2012 18:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just letting you all know we're working on the frustrating and
increasingly frequent "Load at xx.xx, try again later" errors when
reading this forum through NNTP. They are caused by a significant growth
spurt in newsgroup readership that occurred in
On Saturday, 12 May 2012 at 10:16:45 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
I can barely make contact with the newsgroup server at this
point... any news on upping the server capacity?
The idea that any reasonably-sized machine shouldn't be able to
run a fairly small newsgroup server these days still
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 09:33:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:19:12 Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 12.05.2012 20:26, schrieb Walter Bright:
> On 5/12/2012 4:47 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>> What are the plans to finish the WinAPI in druntime? It's
>> grossly
>> lacking at t
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 14:04:01 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Thanks for the reply!
This isn't a library. This is a weird framework, which needs me
to run my
sources through some executables.
I need a good library with no garbage. Pure D code, that I can
merge with
my sources.
You might wa
So, thanks to all. It works after adding 'export' keyword and '_'
symbol before function name.
If I have an option to legitimately use vibe as a library only, then OK.
I just don't like things like Qt, which make a religious ritual out of a
library usage.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:22 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 14:04:01 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>
>> Thanks fo
On 14-05-2012 15:21, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I thing the zero-terminated literal shtick is pointless. Literals are
rarely passed to C functions, so we gotta use the std.utf.toUTFz anyway.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Christophe
mailto:trav...@phare.normalesup.org>> wrote:
deadalnix , da
On 14-05-2012 19:16, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
At least we could make an empty string a null array of characters for
consistency. How many times did anyone use the feature of string
literals being null-terminated?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis mailto:jmdavisp...@gmx.com>> wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering, is anyone aware if there been any efforts on
using D as the foundation for a GPGPU language?
For example: Given that there is are LLVM based D and CUDA
compilers, might there be a way to modify D to nVidia GPU-enabled
DUDA similar to how C++ is modified to CUDA, without
But it is something strange, one function need '_' and another
dont:(
In D dll i have:
extern (C) int function() f;
alias typeof(f) myfunc;
export extern (C) int retten()
{
return 10;
}
export extern (C) void setf(myfunc ff)
{
f=ff;
}
export extern (C) int ret()
{
return
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 13:25:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
No, I'm telling you how SWT/DWT works. How "dispose" works in
DWT is _not_ the same as doing managing memory manually.
Memory? The entire issue is about a handle leak, not a memory
leak...
I think CUDA is a completely pointless waste of time because of OpenCL.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:35 PM, <"Anders Sjögren\"
"@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering, is anyone aware if there been any efforts on using D as
> the foundation for a GPGPU language?
>
> For example: Given that
This is the original thread and there's no reply from you prior to this one.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 14-05-2012 19:16, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>
>> At least we could make an empty string a null array of characters for
>> consistency. How many times did anyo
If printf is used instead of writeln, then there's something seriously
wrong with druntime in the first place. This is just ridiculous.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 14-05-2012 15:21, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>
>> I thing the zero-terminated literal shtick is poin
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
--
Dmitry Olshansky
Le 14/05/2012 00:56, Mehrdad a écrit :
On Sunday, 13 May 2012 at 22:51:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Anything that absolutely requires them will probably have to either
have to break the type system or use _other_ functions with the same
functionality but without those attributes. In some case
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 09:05:51 UTC, SomeDude wrote:
I'm having an issue with the configure part, it can't find my
libgtkmm-2.4 even though it's dpkg installed. It would be nice
It seems only binaries are installed, no lib's headers.
Installation of libgtkmm-2.4-dev can help to solve the is
On 5/14/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Really, printf is the *only* reason to have this backwards compatibility
> "feature", and I strongly wish we could get rid of it.
printf is also unique in that it works when called in class
destructors, which is sometimes needed for debugging (unlike writ
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non
const is memoize. It can be tackled with lib support in phobos.
What are other uses cases ?
Not necessarily 'memoization' -- you could be instead querying
another object for t
On 14-05-2012 21:04, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non const is
memoize. It can be tackled with lib support in phobos.
What are other uses cases ?
Not necessarily 'memoization' -- you could be i
Le 14/05/2012 04:47, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
They can be in almost all cases. The problem is the folks who want to have
caching and/or lazy initiailization in their classes/structs. You can't cache
the result of any of those functions (toHash being the main target for it) if
they're const and
Le 14/05/2012 21:04, Mehrdad a écrit :
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non const is
memoize. It can be tackled with lib support in phobos.
What are other uses cases ?
Not necessarily 'memoization' -- you could b
On 5/14/12 1:40 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
The issue seems to be different than sheer computing powe
"Gor Gyolchanyan" wrote in message
news:mailman.722.1337004471.24740.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>I was browsing dsource.org for some libraries, that I need and every single
> project, that I looked at was either completely abandoned or stuck with
> the
> ancient D1.
> Is there at least one s
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:18:42PM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
> Lazy initialization is more a problem than a solution when it comes
> to multithreading. And I'm afraid it is the future.
>
> BTW, nothing prevent to define toString an non const and another as
> const. The const one cannot cache t
Dne 14.5.2012 19:59, crashtua napsal(a):
But it is something strange, one function need '_' and another dont:(
In D dll i have:
extern (C) int function() f;
alias typeof(f) myfunc;
export extern (C) int retten()
{
return 10;
}
export extern (C) void setf(myfunc ff)
{
f=ff;
}
export extern (C) i
Le 14/05/2012 16:37, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Note that [] is a request to the runtime to build an empty array. The
runtime detects this, and rather than consuming a heap allocation to
build nothing, it simply returns a null-pointed array. This is 100% the
right decision, and I don't think
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:07:30 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 5/14/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Really, printf is the *only* reason to have this backwards compatibility
"feature", and I strongly wish we could get rid of it.
printf is also unique in that it works when called in class
de
On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:08:06 -0400, Tove wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 16:53:24 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:10 AM, Chris Cain wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 02:57:57 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
The problem is that it's unavoidable.
i.e. you can't say "don't mark it as const if it i
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 19:13:30 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 14/05/2012 21:04, Mehrdad a écrit :
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non
const is
memoize. It can be tackled with lib support in phobos.
What are other
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:23:59 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:07:30 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 5/14/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Really, printf is the *only* reason to have this backwards
compatibility
"feature", and I strongly wish we could get rid of
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:01 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 14-05-2012 21:04, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non const is
memoize. It can be tackled with lib support in phobos.
What are ot
On 14-05-2012 21:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/14/12 1:40 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.05.2012 22:06, Kagamin wrote:
I wonder if something like this will be more painful?
http://www.freewebhostingarea.com/
Or rather a cheap dedicated VPS box.
http://buyvm.net/
15$/year ?
The issu
Le 14/05/2012 21:24, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:08:06 -0400, Tove wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 16:53:24 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/14/2012 06:10 AM, Chris Cain wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 02:57:57 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
The problem is that it's unavoidable
Le 14/05/2012 21:25, Mehrdad a écrit :
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 19:13:30 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 14/05/2012 21:04, Mehrdad a écrit :
On Monday, 14 May 2012 at 18:52:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The only reason I'd see a toSting function as non pure or non const is
memoize. It can be tackled with
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:30:25 -0400, deadalnix wrote:
Le 14/05/2012 16:37, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Note that [] is a request to the runtime to build an empty array. The
runtime detects this, and rather than consuming a heap allocation to
build nothing, it simply returns a null-pointed ar
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
