On 12/07/2012 22:49, dsimcha wrote:
Congratulations to Antti-Ville Tuuainen for passing the GSoC 2012
midterm evaluation! Despite going through a steep learning curve to
learn D's template metaprogramming system, Antti-Ville has precise heap
scanning for the garbage collector close to working
Am Sat, 14 Jul 2012 05:24:50 +0200
schrieb Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de:
* const T* should be replaced with const(T)*
When it's a function parameter you could even make it const(T*):
void hello(const char *name);
-- extern(C) void hello(const(char*) name);
as the pointer itself is passed
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:49 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail@**erdani.orgseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 22:27:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, July 13, 2012 14:11:44 monarch_dodra wrote:
But I still feel that the internal call to opSlice/copy is
really
a just trap disguised as a safety net...
Yeah. Kind of.
The thing is that there's no way around the fact
On 14-07-2012 07:00, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:49:03 -0700
H. S. Teohhst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:31:02AM +0200, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
I took a quick look at the Ceylon language (http://ceylon-lang.org/)
[...]
They also have couple of
On 07/13/12 21:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:36 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
The initial question was: why does DMD 2.059 reject this if this makes
sense?
It's not even a new feature. It's a (possibly) new (and apparently
sensible) use case of an existing feature.
I think the
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 18:00:05 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Which doesn't make sense, IMO. What do you guys think about
this? Who makes
more sense me or DMD 2.059?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1175
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/889
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Guillaume Chatelet
chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/13/12 21:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:36 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
The initial question was: why does DMD 2.059 reject this if this makes
sense?
It's not even a new feature.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 18:00:05 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Which doesn't make sense, IMO. What do you guys think about this? Who
makes
more sense me or DMD 2.059?
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 13:47:29 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I see it's already merged. I presume this will end up in DMD 2.060, right?
Anything and everything which has already been merged on github will end up in
the next release of dmd unless it's reverted or altered by another commit
prior
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 13:47:29 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I see it's already merged. I presume this will end up in DMD 2.060,
right?
Anything and everything which has already been merged on github will end
up in
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:00:14 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
That's great. That means, I don't have to work around it and I can just
wait a bit until DMD 2.060 comes out. Btw, when will it happen?
No idea. Normally, releases have been happening every 2 months or so, but
we're at just passed 3
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:00:14 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
That's great. That means, I don't have to work around it and I can just
wait a bit until DMD 2.060 comes out. Btw, when will it happen?
No idea. Normally,
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:21:01 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:00:14 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
That's great. That means, I don't have to work around it and I can just
wait a bit until DMD
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:21:01 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.comwrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 14:00:14 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
That's great.
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D front-end in D, I
think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same space as the
code being compiled. This means, having the back-end as a library solution.
This would automatically provide 100% compile-time code introspection. This
Am 14.07.2012 11:45, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Guillaume Chatelet
chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com mailto:chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/13/12 21:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:36 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
The initial question
Am 14.07.2012 07:13, schrieb H. S. Teoh:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:00:18AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:49:03 -0700
H. S. Teohhst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:31:02AM +0200, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
I took a quick look at the Ceylon language
Am 14.07.2012 12:48, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D front-end in D,
I think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same space as
the code being compiled. This means, having the back-end as a library
solution. This would automatically
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 12:48, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D front-end in D,
I think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same space as
the code being compiled. This
On 07/14/2012 07:13 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What boggles my mind is the fact that they have '===' *and* 'is'. I
don't think I want to know what's the difference between them.
'is' is not a binary operator. It is the equivalent of 'instanceof' in Java.
is Type object
On 7/14/12 5:36 AM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
class Fruit {
class Seed {
}
}
class Apple extends Fruit {
class AppleSeed extends Fruit.Seed {
Apple getOuter() {
return Apple.this;
}
}
}
class Main {
public static void main(String[] args)
On 07/14/12 13:51, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/14/12 5:36 AM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
class Fruit {
class Seed {
}
}
class Apple extends Fruit {
class AppleSeed extends Fruit.Seed {
Apple getOuter() {
return Apple.this;
}
}
}
On 07/14/12 11:41, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 18:00:05 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Which doesn't make sense, IMO. What do you guys think about this? Who
makes
more sense me or DMD 2.059?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1175
On 07/14/2012 01:29 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
It would also make run-time mixins possible, which is absolutely amazing.
It is amazingly unsafe, because at runtime there is no distinction
between strings generated by the program and strings created from input
to the program.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Guillaume Chatelet
chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/14/12 11:41, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 18:00:05 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
Which doesn't make sense, IMO. What do you guys think about this? Who
makes
more sense me
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 01:29 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
It would also make run-time mixins possible, which is absolutely amazing.
It is amazingly unsafe, because at runtime there is no distinction
between strings generated by the
Run-time mixins can be used for incredibly powerful stuff, yet the same
run-time mixins can be used for incredibly dangerous stuff. Just don't
use them if you don't know exactly what you're doing. :-)
I don't see any case where a runtime-mixin is the only solution (it's
definitly the unsafest)
On Jul 14, 2012 9:15 AM, David d...@dav1d.de wrote:
Run-time mixins can be used for incredibly powerful stuff, yet the same
run-time mixins can be used for incredibly dangerous stuff. Just don't
use them if you don't know exactly what you're doing. :-)
I don't see any case where a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Kevin Cox kevincox...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 2012 9:15 AM, David d...@dav1d.de wrote:
Run-time mixins can be used for incredibly powerful stuff, yet the same
run-time mixins can be used for incredibly dangerous stuff. Just don't
use them if you
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:31:34 +0200, Christophe Travert
trav...@phare.normalesup.org wrote:
By the way, would it be possible to implement an opCmp that returns a
double, to allow it to return a NaN ? That may allow to create values
that are neither superior, nor inferior to other value, like
On 14-07-2012 12:48, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D front-end in D,
I think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same space as
the code being compiled. This means, having the back-end as a library
solution. This would automatically
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org wrote:
On 14-07-2012 12:48, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D front-end in D,
I think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same space as
the code being compiled. This
Am 14.07.2012 14:52, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On 07/14/2012 01:29 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
It would also make run-time mixins possible, which is absolutely amazing.
It is amazingly unsafe, because at runtime there is no distinction
between strings generated by the program and strings created
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:47 PM, dennis luehring dl.so...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 14:52, schrieb Timon Gehr:
On 07/14/2012 01:29 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
It would also make run-time mixins possible, which is absolutely amazing.
It is amazingly unsafe, because at runtime there is
Am 14.07.2012 15:23, schrieb Kevin Cox:
On Jul 14, 2012 9:15 AM, David d...@dav1d.de wrote:
Run-time mixins can be used for incredibly powerful stuff, yet the same
run-time mixins can be used for incredibly dangerous stuff. Just don't
use them if you don't know exactly what you're doing. :-)
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
mailto:a...@lycus.org wrote:
On 14-07-2012 12:48, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D
front-end in D,
I
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 10:48:56 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an amazing thought. If we end up getting a D
front-end in D, I
think it would be possible to make the back-end in the same
space as the
code being compiled. This means, having the back-end as a
library solution.
This
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
mailto:a...@lycus.org wrote:
On 14-07-2012 12:48, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
mailto:a...@lycus.org wrote:
On 14-07-2012 12:48, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
I just got an
On 07/14/2012 05:24 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
...
For instance, everybody seems to love hard-wiring the syntax
into the
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 05:24 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
...
For
On 07/14/2012 05:28 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 04:44 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus.org
On 07/14/2012 05:42 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 07/14/2012 05:24 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch
On 13/07/2012 21:10, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:07 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org mailto:seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
On 7/13/12 2:30 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
The whole point is to have it
On 14/07/2012 08:27, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org mailto:seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
On 7/13/12 3:49 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
On 14/07/2012 15:33, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Kevin Cox kevincox...@gmail.com
mailto:kevincox...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 2012 9:15 AM, David d...@dav1d.de mailto:d...@dav1d.de
wrote:
Run-time mixins can be used for incredibly powerful stuff,
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 8:17 PM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/07/2012 08:27, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail@**erdani.orgseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
On
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
this.outer = fruit;
}
}
}
class Apple: Fruit
{
void AppleOnlyMethod(){ ... }
class AppleSeed: Fruit.Seed {
void DoSomething()
{
AppleOnlyMethod();
}
}
auto
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.dewrote:
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
this.outer = fruit;
}
}
}
class Apple: Fruit
{
void AppleOnlyMethod(){ ... }
class
On 2012-07-14 05:24, Jens Mueller wrote:
Hi,
there is some documentation on writing a Deimos interface.
E.g.
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP12
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html
I'd like to get a list of rules that one has to follow.
First you have to convert the
2012/7/15 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
this.outer = fruit;
Setting to pseudo variable 'outer' should be rejected in compilation.
Please report it to bugzilla.
}
}
}
Am 14.07.2012 19:21, schrieb kenji hara:
2012/7/15 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
this.outer = fruit;
Setting to pseudo variable 'outer' should be rejected in compilation.
Am 14.07.2012 19:18, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de
mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.dewrote:
Am 14.07.2012 19:21, schrieb kenji hara:
2012/7/15 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
The only problem about this is:
class Fruit
{
class Seed {
void SetFruit(Fruit fruit)
{
Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com writes:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 06:52:25 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I hope Walter isn't against this, because I'm not seeing much
community disagreement with this...
I would not be against having development and stable versions, but the
price is not trivial:
Am 14.07.2012 19:30, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de
mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 19:21, schrieb kenji hara:
2012/7/15 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de
mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
On 7/13/2012 9:58 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
All that being the case, I don't know what this proposal actually buys us.
I tend to agree.
On 07/15/2012 12:55 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 19:30, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de
mailto:c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 19:21, schrieb kenji hara:
2012/7/15 Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de
On 07/13/2012 09:45 PM, Mehrdad wrote: On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at
03:16:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10151094464083109
Andrei
Still though, I feel calling it imperfect is kinda strong. It doesn't
have any _problems_ per se, just
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:56:50 -0700, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 7/13/2012 9:58 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
All that being the case, I don't know what this proposal actually buys
us.
I tend to agree.
If this was the case; 2.059 would not be three months old with
i need a discreet handle on the calling/instantiating source file (module).
using __FILE__, it is surprisingly easy for functions (via argument) and
templated functions (via template parameter) but i cannot get it working for
templated classes. how can i make them aware of the calling module?
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 01:53:34 captaindet wrote:
i need a discreet handle on the calling/instantiating source file (module).
using __FILE__, it is surprisingly easy for functions (via argument) and
templated functions (via template parameter) but i cannot get it working
for templated
Thanks, I've got another problem:
void f()
{
sema.wait();
++x;
sema.notify();
}
sema is the global shared Semaphore (as above)
main.d(29): Error: function core.sync.semaphore.Semaphore.wait ()
is not callable using argument types () shared
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 09:15:55 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
Isn't this the way shared is used (or should be used)?
Should be used: probably yes. But functions/methods which are
able to act on shared data must be marked so, and unfortunately,
the druntime primitives are not yet annotated
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 18:09:59 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I would think the best solution is to create a mutable local
version, and then assign the immutable global one when you are
done.
Thanks for the workaround. But I'm actually more interested in
whether or not this is a compiler
Maybe someone is interested in participating:
http://icfpcontest2012.wordpress.com/task/
Bye,
bearophile
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 11:01:06 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Maybe someone is interested in participating:
http://icfpcontest2012.wordpress.com/task/
Bye,
bearophile
I already am!
With D aswell, but you ran away from the #d too fast for me to
reply.
Wouldn't mind some D help on a few
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 09:21:27 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 09:15:55 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
Isn't this the way shared is used (or should be used)?
Should be used: probably yes. But functions/methods which are
able to act on shared data must be marked so,
Try -L-lX11
On 2012-07-14 02:12, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[..]
I believe that __FILE__ and __LINE__ are treated specially with
functions in order for them to be filled in at the call site rather
than the declaration site. If it's not working with classes, then
that probably means that whatever special logic
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 13:30:03 captaindet wrote:
IIRC, __FILE__ is a template itself
It's not. It's a special symbol recognized by the compiler, and ends up in
several places in the grammar.
- Jonathan M Davis
On 07/14/2012 08:53 AM, captaindet wrote:
i need a discreet handle on the calling/instantiating source file
(module). using __FILE__, it is surprisingly easy for functions (via
argument) and templated functions (via template parameter) but i cannot
get it working for templated classes. how can i
auto _fun = fun(); //_fun == main.d
auto _tfun = tfun(); //_tfun == main.d
auto _tclass = new tclass!(); //_tclass.from == other.d !!!
//this works but i do not want to provide __FILE__ explicitly:
auto _tclassx = new tclass!(__FILE__)(); //_tclass.from == main.d
//and why do i get 2 different
On Saturday, 14 July 2012 at 12:55:21 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:
Try -L-lX11
Yeah I was already linking X11. The problem was the binding, it
defined a function that was never defined in the original c
header, so it would not be able to find the function anywhere.
Commenting the defs out in the
I was looking at the xtend example 4 Distances here, and see
that their new generation capability includes ability to do 3.cm
10.mm , and these result in calls to cm(3) and mm(10).
http://blog.efftinge.de/
I see that similar capability was discussed for D previously at
the link below.
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support something like 3.cm(). Not sure from
the discussion if it would also accept 3.cm as in the xtext/xtend
example.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/smoniukqfxerutqrj...@forum.dlang.org
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 05:30:55 Jay Norwood wrote:
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support something like 3.cm(). Not sure from
the discussion if it would also accept 3.cm as in the xtext/xtend
example.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8389
Summary: Classes, nested in the same base class cannot be
derived from.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8388
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-13 23:33:57
PDT ---
It looks like MermberFunctionsTuple only grabs virtual functions. This code
import std.stdio;
import std.traits;
class C
{
void foo()() {}
void
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4957
Johan Hernandez thepumpkin1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7973
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 03:55:37 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8389
Guillaume Chatelet chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8389
Guillaume Chatelet chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1175
Guillaume Chatelet chatelet.guilla...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6999
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 06:13:44 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6999
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4662
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 07:19:24 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7385
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-07-14 07:40:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This bug also bypasses gagging:
void main()
{
immutable double[] nums = [1.0, 2.0];
static assert(!is(typeof({ nums[] /=
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7385
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4662
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-07-14 08:11:15 PDT ---
Additional fix for yebblies's patch:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1046
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5403
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 08:55:19 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7385
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 11:42:13 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7385
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7894
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 13:03:37 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7894
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5403
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6497
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-14 20:12:56 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6497
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
100 matches
Mail list logo
