On 7/19/13, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> In case you haven't seen it yet.
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/1imyhy/is_the_d_programming_language_a_better_choice/
It looks like the thread has been removed (but still visible through this link).
On 20/07/13 17:31, Michael wrote:
> Hi, D community.
> DMD is released regularly, but third party projects owners doesn't want or
> doesn't have time to update documentation.
> It's will be cool to have permanent links to most resent stable dmd release
> archive, linux .deb, .rpm package, windows
Hi, D community.
DMD is released regularly, but third party projects owners
doesn't want or doesn't have time to update documentation.
It's will be cool to have permanent links to most resent stable
dmd release archive, linux .deb, .rpm package, windows installer,
etc.
Who can help with this
On Friday, 19 July 2013 at 20:49:27 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
Status update:
excluding c-style array declarations, which I'm convinced are
broken and should be removed from the language
+1
I found for myself that "native" style arrays are more natural.
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 00:47:53 UTC, Manu wrote:
This raises the parallel question of:
alias A(T) = expression;
Which I think is equally common as the enum case described here?
Common or not, I'd expect consistency.
Kenji Hara:
Posted pull request:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2368
Is implementing that better than implementing issue 7364?
Bye,
bearophile
Posted pull request:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2368
Kenji Hara
2013/6/26 Walter Bright
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP42
>
On 18.07.2013 16:09, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"David" wrote in message
news:ks8lcs$184p$1...@digitalmars.com...
Am 18.07.2013 13:49, schrieb Daniel Murphy:
"David" wrote in message
news:ks6m33$o9b$1...@digitalmars.com...
Why doesn't GC.calloc follow the function signature of stdc.calloc?
cal
On 2013-07-19 22:49, Brian Schott wrote:
Status update:
My parser is at a point where it can parse all of phobos (well,
excluding c-style array declarations, which I'm convinced are broken and
should be removed from the language).
I've been updating the grammar definition as I worked on the par
