On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 15:25:49 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 07/26/2013 08:06 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 26 July 2013 at 04:30:18 UTC, Manu wrote:
Is there an FLS implementation floating around?
If not, it's probably something that should be considered for
std.thread.
I'd also love t
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:59:33 -0700
Walter Bright wrote:
> Not aimed at anyone in particular, but I see these kinds of
> statements all too often:
>
> "Sure, I believe in free speech, but you can't let that guy say those
> things!"
>
> "I'm certainly not advocating censorship, but those books do
Fixed, thanks. I wasn't sure if the post was ready for Reddit,
as it's mainly some thoughts written down for advanced D users.
Thanks for writing this. Aside from the primary purpose of the
article, I was able to learn along the way more about D's mixins
because of it.
As a game architect, I
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 20:08:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/27/2013 11:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not really an article or anything - this was planned as just a
post to this
newsgroup, but I decided to put it somewhere suitable for
larger blocks of text
with formatting:
http://bl
Not aimed at anyone in particular, but I see these kinds of statements all too
often:
"Sure, I believe in free speech, but you can't let that guy say those things!"
"I'm certainly not advocating censorship, but those books don't belong in the
public library!"
That said, I pay the bills for t
Blaming person X for that, famous or not, would be a ridiculous
shifting
of responsibilities
==
That said, it is also clear that in any organization,
attitudes, tone and style flow from the top down. (It's amazing
how pervasive this is.)
Totally agree, I didn't mention blaming. Of course, ev
On 7/29/2013 1:31 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Blaming person X for that, famous or not, would be a ridiculous shifting
of responsibilities on par with blaming some music band, or blaming JD
Salinger, etc. A person, famous or not, cannot rationally be held
responsible for what the masses of idiots
On 07/29/13 22:43, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 07/29/13 17:24, bearophile wrote:
>> Maybe there is a way to allow that too:
>>
>>
>> template Select(bool condition, T...) if (T.length == 2) {
>> static if (condition)
>> enum Select = T[0];
>> else
>> enum Select = T[1];
>> }
>
On 07/29/13 17:24, bearophile wrote:
> Maybe there is a way to allow that too:
>
>
> template Select(bool condition, T...) if (T.length == 2) {
> static if (condition)
> enum Select = T[0];
> else
> enum Select = T[1];
> }
>
> void main() {
> enum x = Select!(true, 10
On 07/29/13 17:03, bearophile wrote:
> errors += global.endGagging(oldGaggedErrors);
>
> It's replaced with:
> if (global.endGagging(oldGaggedErrors))
> errors = true;
>
> Looking at that code it's easy to think about code like this, that is not
> currently supported:
>
> errors ||= global.
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:47:30 +0200
"Jonathan A Dunlap" wrote:
> Simply I believe the people
> who have the most respect or fame in the industry need to be the
> most careful about their expression.
I agree with that, but only because being well-known leads to a much
higher change of being quot
On 7/27/2013 11:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not really an article or anything - this was planned as just a post to this
newsgroup, but I decided to put it somewhere suitable for larger blocks of text
with formatting:
http://blog.thecybershadow.net/2013/07/28/low-overhead-components/
Pleas
On 7/27/13 11:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not really an article or anything - this was planned as just a post to
this newsgroup, but I decided to put it somewhere suitable for larger
blocks of text with formatting:
http://blog.thecybershadow.net/2013/07/28/low-overhead-components/
Vote up
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:03:25 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:59:01 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
A recent pull makes the jump to list generate before the page
is shown so we won't get it suddenly appearing anymore. It's
not the jump to list that's slow, it's hyphenate
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:06:12 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:03:25 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:59:01 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
A recent pull makes the jump to list generate before the page
is shown so we won't get it suddenly appearing a
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:59:01 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
A recent pull makes the jump to list generate before the page
is shown so we won't get it suddenly appearing anymore. It's
not the jump to list that's slow, it's hyphenate.js that is the
bottleneck. The jump list generation would h
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:51:28 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
In the docs for std.format we have the following example:
import std.c.stdio;
import std.format;
void main()
{
auto writer = appender!string();
formattedWrite(writer, "%s is the ultimate %s.", 42,
"ans
In the docs for std.format we have the following example:
import std.c.stdio;
import std.format;
void main()
{
auto writer = appender!string();
formattedWrite(writer, "%s is the ultimate %s.", 42,
"answer");
assert(writer.data == "42 is the ultimate answ
On Friday, 26 July 2013 at 04:30:18 UTC, Manu wrote:
Is there an FLS implementation floating around?
If not, it's probably something that should be considered for
std.thread.
Nice to see this asked. For a simulation library I was developing
I was thinking that fiber support had to be done by
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 17:52:41 UTC, Meta wrote:
In your notation, it seems like there could be issues. What if
T2 is a local variable, then is that an assignment? If there
is no possible issues then I wouldn't mind having such a
syntax... anything is better than nothing.
I don't think it
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 17:35:09 UTC, JS wrote:
I don't think that is very robust notation but if it is then it
would work.
Using ';' makes it obvious the next group is starting.
I think using f(..., name = ...) is pretty obvious, and possibly
easier to spot in a list of commas than `;`.
That could give the impression that Linus frequently /uses
obscenity/
as a /method/, which would be very, very misleading.
Zed Shaw also falls into this category. He is usually polite and
civil during debates. However like Linus, he does sometimes throw
around obscenity to express a particula
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 17:28:57 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 17:22:50 UTC, JS wrote:
I'm not sure how named parameters would solve the original
problem
Your original use case:
template t(T1..., T2...)
...
t!(a, b, c; d, e, f);
Becomes
//Some weird hypothetical syntax
te
On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Manu wrote:
> Is there an FLS implementation floating around?
> If not, it's probably something that should be considered for std.thread.
Nope. I'd love to have this, but it's pretty tricky once you include the need
for dynamic library support and my time is quite
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 17:22:50 UTC, JS wrote:
I'm not sure how named parameters would solve the original
problem
Your original use case:
template t(T1..., T2...)
...
t!(a, b, c; d, e, f);
Becomes
//Some weird hypothetical syntax
template t(@name("T1") T1..., @name("T2") T2...)
{
.
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 16:52:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 16:02:02 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Except for this...
alias K = Select!(true, 4, int);
;)
Useful? I don't think so... but I thought I'd point it out ^^
I think it's a feature that this doesn't work. As for variad
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 16:02:02 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Except for this...
alias K = Select!(true, 4, int);
;)
Useful? I don't think so... but I thought I'd point it out ^^
I think it's a feature that this doesn't work. As for variadic
grouping, named parameters could easily solve this
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 16:00:47 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Wait never mind my above post. Your approach works.
Except for this...
alias K = Select!(true, 4, int);
;)
Useful? I don't think so... but I thought I'd point it out ^^
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 15:57:36 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 15:31:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
How do you tell apart values from not values? :-)
Is this brutal enough? :-)
enum SameKind(T...) =
__traits(compiles, {enum x = T[0], y = T[1]; }) ||
__traits(compil
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 15:31:39 UTC, bearophile wrote:
How do you tell apart values from not values? :-)
Is this brutal enough? :-)
enum SameKind(T...) =
__traits(compiles, {enum x = T[0], y = T[1]; }) ||
__traits(compiles, {alias x = T[0]; alias y = T[1]; });
template Select(boo
template Select(bool condition, T...)
if (T.length == 2 && SameKind!T) {
static if (__traits(compiles, {enum x = T[0];})) {
static if (condition)
enum Select = T[0];
else
enum Select = T[1];
} else {
static if (condition)
alias Se
How do you tell apart values from not values? :-)
Is this brutal enough? :-)
enum SameKind(T...) =
__traits(compiles, {enum x = T[0], y = T[1]; }) ||
__traits(compiles, {alias x = T[0]; alias y = T[1]; });
template Select(bool condition, T...)
if (T.length == 2 && SameKind!T) {
st
On 07/26/2013 08:06 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 26 July 2013 at 04:30:18 UTC, Manu wrote:
Is there an FLS implementation floating around?
If not, it's probably something that should be considered for std.thread.
I'd also love to have one ! (in fact I do think it should be the default).
W
monarch_dodra:
Select!(cond, 1, 2);// This doesn't compile
Time ago I asked for an improvement of Select:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1235
Maybe there is a way to allow that too:
template Select(bool condition, T...) if (T.length == 2) {
static if (condition)
John Colvin:
There are a mind-boggling large number of things that are
useful, but that's not the criteria for adding something to a
programming language.
A new feature has to be *sufficiently* useful to justify the
increased complexity of the language and it's implementations
(plus not cla
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 14:46:02 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote:
You can achieve this like so:
template Outer(T...) {
template Inner(U...) {
// Do something with T and U
}
}
Outer!(a, b, c).Inner!(d, e, f);
You can see an example of it in action here (type tuple
interse
https://github.com/Etherous/dcrypt
Hmm, last commit 3 years ago? It'll probably take quite a bit of
work to bring it up to Phobos quality (and probably to get it to
even compile).
It does look pretty complete though...
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 14:34:13 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 14:21:45 UTC, JS wrote:
Then a third? The fact whether there is a use case or not, or
whether I have one or not should be irrelevant. The issue
should stand on it's own. Having some easily way to use
multipl
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 13:23:23 UTC, JS wrote:
Sometimes it's nice to be able to have groups of variadic
parameters:
template t(T1..., T2...)
...
t!(a, b, c; d, e, f);
so that a,b,c are for T1 and d,e,f are for T2.
This can be done by making a symbol and breaking up a single
variadic b
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 14:21:45 UTC, JS wrote:
Then a third? The fact whether there is a use case or not, or
whether I have one or not should be irrelevant. The issue
should stand on it's own. Having some easily way to use
multiple variadic parameters is either useful or not.
There are a
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 13:59:54 UTC, bearophile wrote:
JS:
The usefulness should be obvious and I seriously doubt if
someone thinks it is not then any example I could give would
convince them otherwise.
It's not obvious for me :-) Explaining the "obvious" is
sometimes necessary.
It
A possible static ternary operator syntax:
enum foo = ct_cond !? Foo!5 : Bar!6;
But in my opinion the need for it is not strong enough, better
to keep the language simpler.
A static ternary operator is sometimes handy, this is working
code:
import std.typetuple: TypeTuple;
template Iota(i
JS:
The usefulness should be obvious and I seriously doubt if
someone thinks it is not then any example I could give would
convince them otherwise.
It's not obvious for me :-) Explaining the "obvious" is sometimes
necessary.
It came up for me trying to write a ternary if to use.
struct
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 13:30:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
JS:
I doubt such a feature will ever get added but who knows...
It seems a cute idea, but why don't you show two or more very
different use cases? (Asking for a feature without showing use
cases is not so good.)
Bye,
bearophile
JS:
I doubt such a feature will ever get added but who knows...
It seems a cute idea, but why don't you show two or more very
different use cases? (Asking for a feature without showing use
cases is not so good.)
Bye,
bearophile
Sometimes it's nice to be able to have groups of variadic
parameters:
template t(T1..., T2...)
...
t!(a, b, c; d, e, f);
so that a,b,c are for T1 and d,e,f are for T2.
This can be done by making a symbol and breaking up a single
variadic but is messy.
I doubt such a feature will ever get
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 10:48:13 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Hi there!
Is there a debugger you would recommend that understands D
(demangling, etc) which runs under OS X? (or otherwise...)
What are you using? A patched gdb? a normal gdb? Any llvm
version? (sometimes it seems not to recognize
On Sunday, 28 July 2013 at 06:20:29 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not really an article or anything - this was planned as just a
post to this newsgroup, but I decided to put it somewhere
suitable for larger blocks of text with formatting:
http://blog.thecybershadow.net/2013/07/28/low-overhead
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 11:00:27 UTC, David wrote:
Am 29.07.2013 12:48, schrieb "Luís Marques"
":
Hi there!
Is there a debugger you would recommend that understands D
(demangling,
etc) which runs under OS X? (or otherwise...)
What are you using? A patched gdb? a normal gdb? Any llvm
vers
Am 29.07.2013 12:48, schrieb "Luís Marques" ":
> Hi there!
>
> Is there a debugger you would recommend that understands D (demangling,
> etc) which runs under OS X? (or otherwise...)
>
> What are you using? A patched gdb? a normal gdb? Any llvm version?
> (sometimes it seems not to recognize stac
I have a template t that returns a string that is always to be
used as a mixin.
It is quite annoying to have to use mixin() on the template.
e.g.,
mixin(t!());
It would be nice to be able to specify that the template is mixed
in at the call site.
e.g.,
string mixin template t() { ... }
Hi there!
Is there a debugger you would recommend that understands D
(demangling, etc) which runs under OS X? (or otherwise...)
What are you using? A patched gdb? a normal gdb? Any llvm
version? (sometimes it seems not to recognize stack frames in my
D code) Or just writeln?
Thanks!
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 08:26:03 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Saturday, 27 July 2013 at 15:58:04 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
I found this thread mentioning some initial work on a crypto
library:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/j84us9$2m5k$1...@digitalmars.com?page=1
It looks like "std.dig
On Saturday, 27 July 2013 at 15:58:04 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
I found this thread mentioning some initial work on a crypto
library:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/j84us9$2m5k$1...@digitalmars.com?page=1
It looks like "std.digest" is what came of that though, not
"std.crypto".
I foun
54 matches
Mail list logo
