[Issue 4475] Improving the compiler 'in' associative array can return just a bool

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475 --- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-08-15 10:49:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Actually, that is not undefined. AA's are designed such that inserting new elements does not invalidate pointers to existing elements. I didn't

[Issue 10723] std.stdio.File.byLine causes segfault when compiling with -O

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-08-15 10:53:46 PDT --- Reduced: struct File { private struct Impl { uint refs = uint.max / 2; } private Impl* _p; private string _name; this(string

[Issue 10824] Unsupported regexp(?) error during run time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10824 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 10781] ctRegex! throws a huge error

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10781 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 10825] [2.064 git-head

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10825 Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 10825] New: [2.064 git-head

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10825 Summary: [2.064 git-head Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Phobos

[Issue 10824] New: Unsupported regexp(?) error during run time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10824 Summary: Unsupported regexp(?) error during run time Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 10801] std.regex: support for lookbehind in ctRegex

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10801 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 10826] New: Should the D GC allocate double4[] aligned to 32 bytes?

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10826 Summary: Should the D GC allocate double4[] aligned to 32 bytes? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

[Issue 10824] Unsupported regexp(?) error during run time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10824 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4475] Improving the compiler 'in' associative array can return just a bool

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475 --- Comment #11 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-08-15 12:03:49 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) [...] Associative arrays have to grow when you keep adding key-value pairs, I presume this is done allocating a new larger hash (probably 2 or

[Issue 10723] std.stdio.File.byLine causes segfault when compiling with -O

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Issue 9119] Forward range addition to associative arrays.

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9119 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 10723] std.stdio.File.byLine causes segfault when compiling with -O

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 --- Comment #5 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2013-08-15 12:20:37 PDT --- Separate issue for dmd bug http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 10827] New: Erroneous default string argument for a char[] type

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10827 Summary: Erroneous default string argument for a char[] type Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid

[Issue 10723] std.stdio.File.byLine causes segfault when compiling with -O

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 --- Comment #6 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-08-15 12:27:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Interesting is that if _name member or in char[] stdioOpenmode = rb are removed, the program runs fine. This is

[Issue 9119] Forward range addition to associative arrays.

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9119 --- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-08-15 12:33:54 PDT --- Using the code in the pull request, this code works: import std.algorithm; import std.conv; import std.stdio: writeln; void main () { int[string] aa; aa[a]

[Issue 10723] std.stdio.File.byLine causes segfault when compiling with -O

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10723 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid, pull | --- Comment #7

[Issue 10827] Erroneous default string argument for a char[] type

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10827 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4475] Improving the compiler 'in' associative array can return just a bool

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475 --- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-08-15 12:52:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) the hash table itself doesn't contain the actual key/value pairs; it just contains pointers to linked-lists of these key/value pairs. So the

[Issue 10161] std.datetime unittest failure Libya Standard Time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10161 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 10828] New: datetime toString functions should accept sink

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10828 Summary: datetime toString functions should accept sink Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 10161] std.datetime unittest failure Libya Standard Time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10161 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2013-08-15 12:56:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I used to hit this on my win8 too. I don't have win8 anymore, so I can't verify if this is fixed or not. I *believe* Jonathan

[Issue 10161] std.datetime unittest failure Libya Standard Time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10161 --- Comment #5 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-08-15 13:04:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) I used to hit this on my win8 too. I don't have win8 anymore, so I can't verify if this is fixed or not. I

[Issue 10161] std.datetime unittest failure Libya Standard Time

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10161 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-08-15 13:01:28 PDT --- I have guessed some names as part of running unittests on win64: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1411 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 10829] New: -inline produces wrong code

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10829 Summary: -inline produces wrong code Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 10830] New: DMD generates two identical version of templated functions

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 Summary: DMD generates two identical version of templated functions Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 2278] Guarantee alignment of stack-allocated variables on x86

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2278 Temtaime temta...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||temta...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 10826] Should the D GC allocate double4[] aligned to 32 bytes?

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10826 Manu turkey...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||turkey...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 10826] Should the D GC allocate double4[] aligned to 32 bytes?

2013-08-15 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10826 --- Comment #2 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com 2013-08-15 20:51:55 PDT --- For clarity, as a simple compiler rule, all __vector() types should be intrinsically aligned to their .sizeof. This is correct on all architectures I know of. There is

<    1   2