- Removed the unrelated Turkish menu from the English pages
- Improved the ebook formats
- Removed the download page and linked the ebook versions directly from
the main page instead
I consider these beta quality:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/
(I am not sure why, but you may have to
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:25:18 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
- Removed the unrelated Turkish menu from the English pages
- Improved the ebook formats
- Removed the download page and linked the ebook versions
directly from the main page instead
I consider these beta quality:
New videos are online :)
part 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YAUfd41URA
part 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGLgiPhwskM
please give me feedback in this thread
On 12/15/2014 03:17 AM, Mengu wrote:
blank space on the left which is caused by the width of the div#content.
I was hoping that no one would notice. :p
if you can change width in styling of div#content
The design of the whole site is less than ideal. :-/
I've done the easiest thing and
On 12/14/2014 03:03 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 12/10/2014 08:50 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce that D support on Travis-CI was launched today.
http://blog.travis-ci.com/2014-12-10-community-driven-language-support-comes-to-travis-ci/
trying it out with pyd, and I'm getting
On 2014-12-14 22:00, Kiith-Sa wrote:
One thing I ran into often when I was inexperienced with D:
the template constraints make some signatures extremely messy, and it
takes a while to figure out when you have e.g. 3 template functions of
the same name in
std.algorithm, all with crypric
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 07:48:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
I have heard good enough first 9000 times, thanks.
If you want to appeal to those users
No.
On 15/12/2014 8:44 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/14/2014 10:21 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 15/12/2014 7:12 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
Branch ~test: Package names may not be empty. Check dub.json.
That's a new error, I fixed the original per Rikki's advice. I don't
understand it,
I found a little interesting difference between ldc, dmd and gdc today.
Summarized in ldc it does not allow you to have multiple extern c'd
function prototypes with different parameters but same mangling aka name.
In dmd and gdc it compiles fine. I believe this is actually wrong.
As c abi does
On 2014-12-14 22:00, Kiith-Sa wrote:
One thing I ran into often when I was inexperienced with D:
the template constraints make some signatures extremely messy, and it
takes a while to figure out when you have e.g. 3 template functions of
the same name in
std.algorithm, all with crypric
On 2014-12-15 08:44, Walter Bright wrote:
How do I get dub to stop looking at the test branch?
I've complained about this before. As far as I know it's not currently
possible. I would rather tell dub myself which versions are available.
Not making all tags available that match a pattern.
On 12/15/2014 09:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've complained about this before. As far as I know it's not currently
possible. I would rather tell dub myself which versions are available.
Not making all tags available that match a pattern.
Well here is the code
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:48:36 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
google? fb? twitter? instagram? watsapp? those are companies that
processes massive traffic. without windows. i prefer to look at them
instead of ACME
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:19:01 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
but talking seriously, i don't need any bounty, i just want somebody to
take a
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:54:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:19:01 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 12/15/2014 12:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I made a suggestion for simplifying signatures in the documentation here [1]
[1] http://forum.dlang.org/thread/lt1hai$186b$1...@digitalmars.com
Please file as an enhancement request in bugzilla. Suggestions in the n.g. are
likely to be
Choosing the way of throwing away code is up to you. Contributing
in a way such it is acknowledged by upstream is defined by,
coincidentally, upstream. The line gets drawn exactly at the
moment where you are not satisfied with just throwing stuff away
but want to claim bounty / get review.
On 12/15/2014 12:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-12-15 08:44, Walter Bright wrote:
How do I get dub to stop looking at the test branch?
I've complained about this before. As far as I know it's not currently possible.
I would rather tell dub myself which versions are available. Not
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:14:26 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Choosing the way of throwing away code is up to you. Contributing
in a way such it is acknowledged by upstream is defined by,
coincidentally, upstream. The line gets drawn exactly at the
moment
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 06:12:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
C++ seems to do fine without it for const. It's a convenience
feature.
C++ const does not really restrict or affect anything for real,
it is non-existent feature. `scope` as proposed would result in
inability to store result
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:07:53 +
uri via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You were looking forward to that, in fact I'd say trolling for
it...
that's not the first time i asking why bugzilla is still able to host
patches. i just wanted to make myself sure that any input is
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 09:31:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:07:53 +
uri via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You were looking forward to that, in fact I'd say trolling for
it...
that's not the first time i asking why bugzilla is still
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 09:31:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:07:53 +
uri via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You were looking forward to that, in fact I'd say trolling for
it...
that's not the first time i asking why bugzilla is still
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:46:29 +
uri via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Ideally there'd be a tool to turn Bugzilla patch submission into
a Github PR. But again it's work *someone* has to do and it isn't
*that* much of a hurdle to get onto Github with a made up account
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:01:03 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 09:31:28 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:07:53 +
uri via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You were looking
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 23:27:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I think I said that clearly: What do you get when you take a
pointer
of a function with an auto-ref
arg? ...an error, because it's not actually a function!
What's baffling to me is why even declare a function pointer
parameter
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:11:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
nope. i'm accepting the fact that D is doomed to be a toy, which
ocasionally used here and there. i tried to fight with this,
but this
fight is lost before it's started. and now i surrender.
Very true.
This
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:49:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:48:36 +
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
google? fb? twitter? instagram? watsapp?
Companies like those are a
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:24:38 UTC, Artem Tarasov wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:11:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
nope. i'm accepting the fact that D is doomed to be a toy,
which
ocasionally used here and there. i tried to fight with this,
but this
fight is lost
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:13:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 07:48:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
I have heard good enough first 9000 times, thanks.
If you want to appeal to those users
No.
So how to you plan to make
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:42:26 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:13:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 07:48:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
I have heard good enough first 9000 times, thanks.
If you
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:54:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:19:01 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:37:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
it is simply too far away effort-wise from something that can
be used.
Contributing something new to C++ standard library - now THAT
is hard :) In D is simply a matter of willingness to do a
quality effort, something any regular
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:52:04 UTC, Artem Tarasov wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:37:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
it is simply too far away effort-wise from something that can
be used.
Contributing something new to C++ standard library - now THAT
is hard :) In D is simply a
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:47:29 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
The attachment feature is useful (and is used) for listing large
test-cases, stack traces etc. It is not an exclusive feature for
patches.
i don't ever talked about disabling attaches. but
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:52:04 UTC, Artem Tarasov wrote:
Fair point. The trouble I have with D in particular is its
definition of 'quality'. For example, I'm unable to consider
THIS 'quality effort':
hhttps://github.com/tom-tan/phobos/commit/c7e99d9baff0749dfb334db322c5471b21a2539d
-
Dear all,
I have a parallel program, using std.parallelism (awesome!), but
I recently noticed that I achieve very poor performance on many
CPUs, and I identified the Garbage Collector to be the main cause
of this. Because I have quite heavy memory usage, the Garbage
collector interrupts all
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 01:44:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 00:10:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
The proposal provides escape proof passing of arguments. This
is necessary in order to make rc safe, for example.
What are you looking for?
I am looking for a tool
I had the same situation, and ended up with the malloc/free
option. It's also often possible to get rid of allocations in a
loop by pre-allocating thread-local buffers and reusing them
throughout (see std.parallelism.TaskPool.workerLocalStorage).
Stephan Schiffels:
2.) Is there a way to pause the GC collection for the
parallel part of my program, deliberately accepting higher
memory usage?
There are GC.disable and GC.enable.
3.) Most of the memory is used in one huge array, perhaps I
should simply use malloc and free for that
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:46:30 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:42:26 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:13:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 07:48:37 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
Well, lots of Fortune 500 companies do.
I
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:25:43 UTC, Mengu wrote:
isn't that enterprise culture or communities/companies
interested in investing in programming languages made java, c#,
python and ruby mainstream?
Java / C# - huge amount of enterprise money invested into it from
the very start and
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:09:49 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:47:29 +
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
The attachment feature is useful (and is used) for listing
large test-cases, stack traces etc. It is not an
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:23:28 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I think there are two cases that are relevant. 1) the tree
nodes don't own their children, instead they are managed by -
let's say - a region allocator, and 2) the tree nodes do own
their children. In both cases, they can declare
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 06:12:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/14/2014 7:41 PM, Dicebot wrote:
Being forced to duplicate every single function in two flavors
to actually make
scope system usable? This is as much critical as it can be.
C++ seems to do fine without it for const. It's
My personal preference is still for C++ done in a similar
manner as vibe.d as I think it's the sweet spot between ease of
use and scalability provided you have a talented team, but I've
seen Java be used successfully for servicing hundreds of
millions of users with a high concurrent
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:32:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:23:28 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I think there are two cases that are relevant. 1) the tree
nodes don't own their children, instead they are managed by -
let's say - a region allocator, and 2) the tree
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:46:30 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I don't plan it and don't realistically ever expect it.
Considering the fact that game development industry is
traditionally one of the worst in contributing upstream I also
don't have any motivation to convince them adopt D.
If
Stephan Schiffels wrote in message
news:wjeozpnitvhtxrkhu...@forum.dlang.org...
I see several ways how to improve my code:
1.) Is there a way to tell the GC the maximum heap size allowed before it
initiates a collection cycle? Cranking that up would cause fewer
collection cycles and hence
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:27:30 +
Mengu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
first of all, judging by your language, you don't seem like a guy
who follows guidelines. why are you even complaining if it's
written here or there?
'cause i see something strange in blaming me for
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:42:31 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:46:30 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I don't plan it and don't realistically ever expect it.
Considering the fact that game development industry is
traditionally one of the worst in contributing upstream I also
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:54:44 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Stephan Schiffels wrote in message
news:wjeozpnitvhtxrkhu...@forum.dlang.org...
I see several ways how to improve my code:
1.) Is there a way to tell the GC the maximum heap size
allowed before it initiates a collection
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:12:55 UTC, Stephan Schiffels
wrote:
3.) Most of the memory is used in one huge array, perhaps I
should simply use malloc and free for that particular array to
avoid the GC from running so often.
Yes. That way you know with certainty the GC won't scan it.
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 20:45:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/13/2014 2:10 AM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
struct Tree {
RefCount!(Tree*) left;
RefCount!(Tree*) right;
...
}
... I don't think I'd ever have a use for this code.
You have no use for tree structures?
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:32:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
For me scopeness is a property of view, not object itself -
this also makes ownership method of actual data irrelevant.
Only difference between GC owned data and stack allocated one
is that former can have scoped view optionally but
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 12:22:32 UTC, Stephan Schiffels
wrote:
Excellent, thanks everyone, problem solved. I use GC.disable
and GC.enable for now, works like a charm. I new about these
functions, but I thought they prevent GC-allocation, not just
collection.
Using ThreadLocal storage
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:11:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
... i'm accepting the fact that D is doomed to be a toy, which
ocasionally used here and there. i tried to fight with this,
but this fight is lost before it's started. and now i surrender.
Well I don't post too much
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:54:44 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Stephan Schiffels wrote in message
news:wjeozpnitvhtxrkhu...@forum.dlang.org...
I see several ways how to improve my code:
1.) Is there a way to tell the GC the maximum heap size
allowed before it initiates a collection
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 08:37:36 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
They then made HUGE noises about the quality of documentation.
The
prevailing opinion was that the D docs, in the eyes of a
not-a-D-expert, are basically unreadable to them. The formatting
didn't help, there's a lot of
Please consider the following program:
import std.exception;
void main()
{
struct A {
int a;
@disable this(this);
@disable ref A opAssign(const ref A);
ref A opOpAssign(string op: ~)(int data) {
a += data;
return this;
}
Is there an official download available that has the source for
dmd, druntime, phobos and tools, but not the binaries as well?
Github releases provide this, but of course that bypasses the
download counters, which isn't ideal.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:00:34 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:11:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
... i'm accepting the fact that D is doomed to be a toy, which
ocasionally used here and there. i tried to fight
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 08:37:36 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
We were unable to build Win64 code (vibe.d doesn't support
Win64 it
seems), and the 32bit compiler produces useless OMF output. We
couldn't link against any of our existing code which was a
serious
inconvenience, but
Stephan Schiffels wrote in message
news:mzlhbfypcihvyatta...@forum.dlang.org...
This doesn't work for me, for some reason. I reserve via
GC.reserve(4_000_000_000), ensured that it does return at least that
amount, but the Garbage collector will still collect like crazy, long
before that
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:27:30 UTC, Mengu wrote:
p.s. i know i have your sympathy because of my all lower-case
writing despite the hate we get. :-)
Ah! That's why I can never parse ketmar's posts at a glance and
keep getting lost. Full stops followed by capital letters make
great
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:01:35 +0200
Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Please consider the following program:
import std.exception;
void main()
{
struct A {
int a;
@disable this(this);
@disable ref A opAssign(const ref
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 15:00:56 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:33:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:01:35 +0200
Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Please consider the following program:
import
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:33:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:01:35 +0200
Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
Please consider the following program:
import std.exception;
void main()
{
struct A {
int a;
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:39:50 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Stephan Schiffels wrote in message
news:mzlhbfypcihvyatta...@forum.dlang.org...
This doesn't work for me, for some reason. I reserve via
GC.reserve(4_000_000_000), ensured that it does return at
least that amount, but the
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:32:30 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
My personal preference is still for C++ done in a similar
manner as vibe.d as I think it's the sweet spot between ease
of use and scalability provided you have a talented team, but
I've seen Java be used successfully for servicing
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:44:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:27:30 UTC, Mengu wrote:
p.s. i know i have your sympathy because of my all lower-case
writing despite the hate we get. :-)
Ah! That's why I can never parse ketmar's posts at a glance and
keep
On 2014-12-15 10:12, Walter Bright wrote:
Would it work if I deleted the tags from the test branch?
I don't know, at least previously Dub tracked branches as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-12-15 09:41, Martin Nowak wrote:
Well here is the code
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub-registry, right?
I don't have time to work on every single project myself.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 15:26:57 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:44:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:27:30 UTC, Mengu wrote:
p.s. i know i have your sympathy because of my all lower-case
writing despite the hate we get. :-)
Ah! That's
Eh, possibly if you're used to a language - like english - that's
mostly only lowercase letters in the first place.
I don't see what your problem with comprehending GH is what
everyone is using for contributions, therefore if you're planning
on making a contribution you should probable do it
On 2014-12-15 10:13, Walter Bright wrote:
Please file as an enhancement request in bugzilla. Suggestions in the
n.g. are likely to be forgotten.
It looks like that has already been filed:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13676
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 12/15/14 12:10 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 15 December 2014 at 07:19, Nick B via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 15:03:27 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Lastly, when judging all these things, please always try to remember that
almost all
Any thoughts on how the upcoming hardware supported bounds
checking from Intel will affect D?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_MPX
Chapter 9 in:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/0d/53/319433-022.pdf
On 12/15/2014 10:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Would it work if I deleted the tags from the test branch?
Deleting the dub.json on the test branch should work.
But you can also leave things as they are, the test branch isn't available.
http://code.dlang.org/packages/dmdscript
On 12/14/14 4:41 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
there is preapproved bounty ER in bugzilla:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11070
i did that, where is my bounty?!
but talking seriously, i don't need any bounty, i just want somebody to
take a look at that and either tell me what
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:50:32 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
your response was what, peasant? I don't care, that's my patch take it
or leave it. It doesn't surprise me that your patch was missed or
ignored.
this is the equal answer to github or
On 12/15/14 12:47 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:50:32 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
your response was what, peasant? I don't care, that's my patch take it
or leave it. It doesn't surprise me that your patch was
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:51:47 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
and this is not only about this particular patch, it's about the things
i already mentioned in this discussion. such as having tools that says
that they are for patches and then
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:26:26AM +, bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Stephan Schiffels:
2.) Is there a way to pause the GC collection for the parallel part
of my program, deliberately accepting higher memory usage?
There are GC.disable and GC.enable.
[...]
Recently in one of my
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 16:30:14 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Any thoughts on how the upcoming hardware supported bounds
checking from Intel will affect D?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_MPX
Chapter 9 in:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 18:05:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i will not use github under any circumstances, but this will be
one
little step along the long consistency road. at least nobody
will be
blamed for using bugzilla according to it's disclaimer. and
surely i
will stop
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 18:05:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i will not use github under any circumstances
Can I ask why? Seriosly. If I may know what you care for.
Disclamer:
- I kind of like your posts and work (projects).
- Asking because I assume you are a GPL'guy (who,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:04:36 +
Piotrek via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 18:05:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i will not use github under any circumstances
Can I ask why? Seriosly. If I may know what you care for.
there are
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:01:19 +
Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't understand your desire to avoid github, but what ever
your reasons if you are willing to write updates for D there
should be a way for you to get that into a pull request. Perhaps
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:04:36 +
Piotrek via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 18:05:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
i will not use github under any
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 00:58:29 UTC, uri wrote:
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 16:44:09 UTC, ddj wrote:
On Saturday, 13 December 2014 at 23:02:52 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On 12/13/2014 10:55 PM, ddj wrote:
But so many issues and bug fixes scares me from using it.
That's just the
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 19:39:08 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:01:19 +
Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
I don't understand your desire to avoid github, but what ever
your reasons if you are willing to write updates
On 12/15/2014 8:49 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/15/2014 10:12 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Would it work if I deleted the tags from the test branch?
Deleting the dub.json on the test branch should work.
But you can also leave things as they are, the test branch isn't available.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:39:40 -0800
H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +0200, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:04:36 +
Piotrek via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15
On 12/15/2014 7:36 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It looks like that has already been filed:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13676
Thanks!
This is just my $0.02, not to ask for anything specific, but to
add to the cross-section of perspectives on this topic, to whom
it may concern:
A colleague and I are writing a framework for building and
managing complex simulations and chose to implement in D for the
modeling power that the
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 20:29:23 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
sadly, i'm maintaining my patchset in the form of .patch files.
git is great for continuous integration, but i routinely build
DMD with some patches disabled, and maintaining that set with
git is cumbersome. that's
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 20:40:29 UTC, evenex wrote:
This is just my $0.02, not to ask for anything specific, but to
add to the cross-section of perspectives on this topic, to whom
it may concern:
A colleague and I are writing a framework for building and
managing complex simulations
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 20:40:29 UTC, evenex wrote:
This is just my $0.02, not to ask for anything specific, but to
add to the cross-section of perspectives on this topic, to whom
it may concern:
A colleague and I are writing a framework for building and
managing complex simulations
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:08:57 +
Wyatt via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 20:29:23 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
sadly, i'm maintaining my patchset in the form of .patch files.
git is great for continuous integration, but i
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
