On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 03:43:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I.e. there isn't low level C code that effectively uses SIMD
vector registers. You have to use the auto-vectorizer, which
tries to reconstruct high level operations out of C low level
code, then recompile.
I don't think low level
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being
unable to delegate this task to a trusty lieutenant in the
community. There's been a bug opened on this for a long time,
it gets regularly discussed here (with the
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:58:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
HS Teoh is right about context, and the superiority of the
written word for organizing and expressing thinking at a very
high level. The nature of human memory and perception means
that is unlikely to change very soon, if ever.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:30:38 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 22:55:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 07:37:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Language features should be tested with real users using
scientific validation processes, instead of being
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:30:38 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Of course there is. Experience and judgement aren't measurable.
You don't have science without numbers.
WTF?
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 10:36:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It was a response to question why vibe.d has reimplemented so
many bits of Phobos without ever contributing it back.
I apologize if it came off this way, I meant it as vibe
shouldn't have to be reimplementing these things, they're
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10925
Stefan Frijters sfrijt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sfrijt...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
Richard Cattermole alphaglosi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Shared library stdio not|Shared library
Am 22.03.2015 um 08:43 schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Am 22.03.2015 um 08:18 schrieb weaselcat:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than one
evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I
On 22/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Stefan Frijters wrote:
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my code, but
apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest keyword, which I
think makes it much harder to quickly see the unittests when scrolling
through the code:
void foo() @safe
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 00:30:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:02 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 00:55:45 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
as an addendum, vibe.d reimplements huge amounts of phobos,
is there a
reason none of this is ever getting upstreamed?
On 3/20/2015 1:35 PM, Koi wrote:
Hello,
after some coding i needed to update some external libraries like
DerelictSDL2. As we all know, one update isn't enough, so i
updated my whole d-environment at the end of the day (current dmd
version, VisualD).
After getting rid of some linking errors
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
--- Comment #11 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com ---
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/melpfi$2scc$1...@digitalmars.com
--
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than
one evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being
unable to delegate this task
Am 22.03.2015 um 08:18 schrieb weaselcat:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than one
evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the
On 3/22/15 12:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than one evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being unable to
delegate this task to a trusty lieutenant
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14107
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* For each line read there was a call to malloc() and one to
free(). I set things up that the buffer used for reading is
reused by simply making the buffer static.
What about e.g.
zip(File(a.txt).byLine, File(b.txt).byLine)
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:46:40 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
But then, how can I keep my delusions and pretend they are fact
because I have experience, judgment and, it goes without
saying, a great sense of aesthetic ?
You will keep your delusions and pretend they are fact until you
take a
On 3/15/2015 1:45 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 15:35:24 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d wrote:
C++ needs a rule like D's, which will never be there.
Yep. By making it so that you only overload a single operator for both
versions of increment, we avoid
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 11:08:49 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 22/03/2015 11:54 p.m., anonymous wrote:
We recently recovered a bunch of pages that were removed from
the menu
accidentally [1]. Two pages are still orphaned and I'm not
sure what to
do about them:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 08:24:42 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Any chance of getting a TemplateParams: (or Template_Params:)
option in the next
dmd release, too? Would help very much with documenting
ranges.
Just put them in Params:.
Yeah, I'm not going to let it block contributing to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
On 3/22/15 1:26 AM, Sad panda wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being unable to
delegate this task to a trusty lieutenant in the community. There's
been a bug opened on this for a long time, it gets
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 05:56:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/21/15 8:54 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
We add it to the .gitignore, then forget about it forever.
Having a
long gitignore doesn't cost us anything.
... but complicated/wrong clean rules in makefiles and clutter
in ls.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:41 UTC, Ozan Süel wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on a Big Data project, where a huge amount of RAM
is needed. Using D I've run into a - let's called it - memory
leak. I tested this with following code:
foreach(i; 0..1000) {
int[] ints;
On 22/03/2015 11:54 p.m., anonymous wrote:
We recently recovered a bunch of pages that were removed from the menu
accidentally [1]. Two pages are still orphaned and I'm not sure what to
do about them:
http://dlang.org/overview.html
This was not part of some $(SUBNAV_*), so removal may have
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 15:09:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:43 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 01:31:21 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/20/15 5:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/20/2015 5:23 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah, and uses
dmd infers function closures impure if impure functions are
defined within them.
even if those are never called and can never be accessed outside
of the closure.
Example :
int a;
void closure() pure {
impure_function() {
a++;
}
}
t.d(4): Error: pure function
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
Issue ID: 14318
Summary: Shared library stdio not loadded
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14081
j...@red.email.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14107
Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
---
On 2015-03-22 at 11:03, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:30:38 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Of course there is. Experience and judgement aren't measurable. You don't have
science without numbers.
WTF?
Heh, everything
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:41 UTC, Ozan Süel wrote:
But why is GC (Garbage Collector) not running? Following the
explanations in http://wiki.dlang.org/Memory_Management memory
usage should be something around 220KB.
The GC maps memory from the underlying OS in pool sized chunks.
The
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:44 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 22/03/2015 10:29 p.m., Stefan Frijters wrote:
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my
code, but
apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I
think makes it much harder to quickly
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10925
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
Historically invariant block needed parenthesis until 2.065.
class C {
invariant {}// Error until 2.065, allowed from 2.066
}
And postfix attributes is valid only for functions.
class
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 17:48:41 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
Motivated by this thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/measc3$qic$1...@digitalmars.com
I was hoping to see if I could do some work on the Phobos
documentation, but I am curious to know what the easiest way
for someone with
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and
is just a very small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, which
does a good job at serving static files
We recently recovered a bunch of pages that were removed from the
menu accidentally [1]. Two pages are still orphaned and I'm not
sure what to do about them:
http://dlang.org/overview.html
This was not part of some $(SUBNAV_*), so removal may have been
deliberate. But there's no mention of
So I was trying to add some attributes to unittests in my code,
but apparently they are only allowed *before* the unittest
keyword, which I think makes it much harder to quickly see the
unittests when scrolling through the code:
void foo() @safe pure nothrow @nogc { } // Ok - I normally use
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 03:26:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Sharing a useful tool of mine.
http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
When I get it right,
* it's based on
On 22/03/2015 10:42 p.m., Ozan =?UTF-8?B?U8O8ZWwi?=
ozan.su...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on a Big Data project, where a huge amount of RAM is needed.
Using D I've run into a - let's called it - memory leak. I tested this
with following code:
foreach(i; 0..1000) {
int[]
On 3/22/15 10:05 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/15/2015 12:15 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
What am I missing?
Sorry haven't read the whole thread.
I think there should be an option (even default on) to allow small
single line functions.
This can sometimes be fairly annoying. For example when
On 3/22/15 3:17 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 05:56:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/21/15 8:54 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
We add it to the .gitignore, then forget about it forever. Having a
long gitignore doesn't cost us anything.
... but complicated/wrong
On 3/22/15 3:54 AM, anonymous wrote:
We recently recovered a bunch of pages that were removed from the menu
accidentally [1]. Two pages are still orphaned and I'm not sure what to
do about them:
http://dlang.org/overview.html
That must go.
This was not part of some $(SUBNAV_*), so removal
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:26:51 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_DMD
Maybe I was doing it wrong, but I couldn't build the docs
following those instructions on Windows 64-bit. What I did was:
cd tools
make -fwin32.mak
cd ..\phobos
make -fwin32.mak html
(copy
thank you Etienne, after i replaced dmd's link.exe my project
compiles successfully in debug-mode again.
i'll add this info in my todo-after-installing-DMD.txt just in
case.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 14:29:14 UTC, Etienne wrote:
This is due to a high amount of symbols in your code.
I
On 3/22/15 3:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* For each line read there was a call to malloc() and one to free(). I
set things up that the buffer used for reading is reused by simply
making the buffer static.
What about
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
On 3/22/15 10:13 AM, tcak wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 16:03:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* For each line read there was a call to malloc() and one to free(). I
set
Am 22.03.2015 um 04:40 schrieb Martin Nowak:
Why would export make private functions public?
Following problem:
// public template
void foo(T)(T arg)
{
bar(T.sizeof);
}
// private implementation helper
private void bar(size_t size) { ... }
Because bar is used from foo, bar has to be
On 03/15/2015 12:15 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
What am I missing?
Sorry haven't read the whole thread.
I think there should be an option (even default on) to allow small
single line functions.
This can sometimes be fairly annoying. For example when writing range
adapters, see
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:02 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the
implementation, and a more formal specification, as well as a
discussion of backwards
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 16:03:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:10 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* For each line read there was a call to malloc() and one to
free(). I
set things up that the buffer used for
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 10:33:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and
is just a very small tool around vibe.d's
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:58:23 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
dmd infers function closures impure if impure functions are defined
within them.
even if those are never called and can never be accessed outside of the
closure.
Example :
int a;
void closure() pure {
impure_function() {
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 19:32:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/22/15 12:27 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 16:08:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:17 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I thought moving things around was also one of your pet
peeves
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 22:16:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
This blog post describes what to consider when switching from
python to go.
http://blog.repustate.com/migrating-code-from-python-to-golang-what-you-need-to-know/#tips
It's very interesting, because the long list of things to give
On 3/22/15 12:27 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 16:08:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:17 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I thought moving things around was also one of your pet peeves :)
Yah but I'm seeing pull requests yeah there's some more junk out
On 3/22/15 12:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Then I also need to get diverted into PR work like improving byLine.
Here PR stands for Public Relations. -- Andrei
On 3/22/2015 3:33 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and is just a very
small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, which
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13590
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/2621b7fe7e60820dcbc4d2b51c9364411f07589e
Issue 13590
Add
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 19:06:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
hm. i missed this part (about dead code). compiler doesn't do
dead
nested function removal before semantic analysis, afair, and
attribute
inference is in semantic stage.
yet you can cheat compiler by turning `impure_function()` to
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 16:08:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:17 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I thought moving things around was also one of your pet peeves
:)
Yah but I'm seeing pull requests yeah there's some more junk
out there, let's just add it to .gitignore. It
On 3/22/15 10:20 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= schue...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:02 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:38:52 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 19:06:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
hm. i missed this part (about dead code). compiler doesn't do dead
nested function removal before semantic analysis, afair, and attribute
inference is in semantic stage.
yet you
weaselcat weasel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two large categories of
programmers: those like writing the same loops over and over
again and
On 3/22/2015 7:21 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
No promises, but if you can give me a pointer or two as to how that might be
implemented, I'd consider having a look at doing it myself.
It would be copy/paste of the code that implements Params:
But I don't see the added value for it, and
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 18:24:31 UTC, ketmar wrote:
you can't do anything with `impure_function` anyway.
Precisely my point!
a perfectly pure function is inferred impure because of dead code!
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 18:44:47 +, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 18:24:31 UTC, ketmar wrote:
you can't do anything with `impure_function` anyway.
Precisely my point!
a perfectly pure function is inferred impure because of dead code!
hm. i missed this part (about dead
On 3/22/15 1:37 PM, Mengu wrote:
while we're at it, let's add D to this list:
https://github.com/github/gitignore
That's be cool, any takers? -- Andrei
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 03:26:14 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Sharing a useful tool of mine.
http://code.dlang.org/packages/serve
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 22:55:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 07:37:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Language features should be tested with real users using
scientific validation processes, instead of being blindly
added to a language.
There is nothing intrinsically
Hi!
I'm working on a Big Data project, where a huge amount of RAM is
needed. Using D I've run into a - let's called it - memory leak.
I tested this with following code:
foreach(i; 0..1000) {
int[] ints;
foreach(j; 0..1000) {
ints
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 10:24:16 UTC, FG wrote:
On 2015-03-22 at 11:03, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:30:38 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Of course there is. Experience and judgement aren't
measurable. You don't
On 23/03/2015 12:08 a.m., Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 22/03/2015 11:54 p.m., anonymous wrote:
We recently recovered a bunch of pages that were removed from the menu
accidentally [1]. Two pages are still orphaned and I'm not sure what to
do about them:
http://dlang.org/overview.html
This was
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 21:25:26 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Just save yourself lots of headaches and abandon the
optlink/omf crap with -m64 resp. -m32mscoff.
thank you.
After some reading about m32mscoff, i have to recompile druntime
and phobos with MODEL=32mscoff to use the new switch?
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 18:37:57 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 18:36:19 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 18:05:07 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Thanks. I was able to reproduce the workflow you showed in
the gif to the part where an error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14230
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
Thanks to everyone who has been filing pull requests on this!
On 3/21/15 8:54 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:mel52r$252b$1...@digitalmars.com...
I've left a comment recently at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3087.
So what's the deal with that? Whenever a new tool leaves some trash,
do we chalk
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14035
--- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #9)
and disallow conversions beyond the categories for non-polymorphic literals
(eg. `4` type with uint).
Of course, even inside same category, loss of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14035
--- Comment #12 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #9)
(In reply to yebblies from comment #6)
Then, because it knows that 4 can fit in a char, it allows it to become
this:
enum alice = { int
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14035
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14035
Ketmar Dark ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ket...@ketmar.no-ip.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14035
--- Comment #14 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to yebblies from comment #12)
This is sort of the whole point of VRP
I think it's a problem in the current implemented semantics of VRP. Applying
VRP beyond the type categories will
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than one evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being unable to
delegate this task to a trusty lieutenant in the community. There's been
a bug opened on
I was wondering how this could be done this afternoon.
Thanks Mengu.
https://github.com/github/gitignore/pull/1444
2015-03-22 22:08 GMT+01:00 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
On 3/22/15 1:37 PM, Mengu wrote:
while we're at it, let's add D to this list:
Something like
while (n != EOF) {
n = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
if (n==-1) throw(...);
if (strcmp(buf, PREFIX) == 0) {
return buf;
}
}
return NULL;
Requires no prior knowledge, and have similar effect.
I'm surprised nobody commented
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 22:04:53 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
I was wondering how this could be done this afternoon.
Thanks Mengu.
https://github.com/github/gitignore/pull/1444
2015-03-22 22:08 GMT+01:00 Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
On 3/22/15 1:37
Handy link:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/d
Posting questions and helping out there now and then will help raise the
visibility of D to a wider audience.
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 02:02:45 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Handy link:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/d
Posting questions and helping out there now and then will help
raise the visibility of D to a wider audience.
I suggest subscribing to the RSS feed for the D tag.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Issue ID: 14319
Summary: core.demangle does not support member function
attributes
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
93 matches
Mail list logo
