On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 22:16:27 UTC, qznc wrote:
And Desktop:
./benchmark.ldc
std: 129 ±24+40 (3121) -17 (6767)
manual: 129 ±31+59 (2668) -21 (7244)
qznc: 112 ±14+30 (2542) -9 (7312)
Chris: 134 ±33+58 (2835) -23 (7068)
Andrei: 123 ±27+53
On 5/30/2016 9:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/30/16 5:51 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/30/2016 8:34 AM, Marc Schütz wrote:
In an ideal world, we'd also want to change the way `length` and
`opIndex` work,
Why? strings are arrays of code units. All the trouble comes from
erratically
On Sunday, 29 May 2016 at 18:02:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
You can create a trusted expression by using a lambda and
immediately calling it. ag0aep6g brought it up.
I would write it like this (untested, but I think this works):
return (()@trusted => )().doSomething();
The key is to
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 07:12:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Currently the documentation for Phobos and druntime is
generated on (I'm guessing) Linux. This can sometimes cause
problems when platform specific declarations are removed due to
them not being available on Linux. Sometimes it
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 06:45:56 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:13:57AM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/30/16 6:00 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/30/2016 11:25 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > I don't agree on changing those. Indexing and slicing a
>
Currently the documentation for Phobos and druntime is generated on (I'm
guessing) Linux. This can sometimes cause problems when platform
specific declarations are removed due to them not being available on
Linux. Sometimes it looks even worse when none of the declarations are
available on
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:13:57AM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 5/30/16 6:00 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 5/30/2016 11:25 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > > I don't agree on changing those. Indexing and slicing a char[] is
> > > really useful and actually not hard to do
On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 23:17:15 UTC, pineapple wrote:
On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 16:22:26 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
From the spec (https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#nested):
"Nested functions cannot be overloaded."
Anybody knows what's the rationale?
I'm guessing it's related to -
On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 at 05:31:59 UTC, chmike wrote:
My conclusion is that rebindable is not a satisfying solution
to have mutable references to immutable objects.
I don't understand the rationale of these immutable references.
It is too constraining.
I still don't know why you're trying
On 5/27/16 10:17 PM, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 18:10:59 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 19:00:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Have I gone completely mad?!?!
Yes, though what does it have to do with this thread? :D
This is by far the most
201 - 210 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
