Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 04:25:07 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: Languages: C#: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0w4e0fzs.aspx Java: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.17.3 C11: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf (See

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

What deadalnix (how did you choose a nickname that is more difficult to write than your given name anyway?) said was that the definition of % only makes sense if, for every n and every m: (n/m)+(n%m)=n What this means is that, if n/m is rounded up for negative numbers, n%m must be negative.

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 03:54:28 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 02:05:53 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 00:31:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 23:01:00 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: This proves nothing. This isn't a proof, this is

Re: GSoC Summer of Code Update

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 17:26:19 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote: Just wanted to congratulate our 4 Google Summer of Code students who have now officially all passed their mid-term evaluations. So congrats to Lodovico, Wojciech, Jeremy, and Sebastian for making it this far, and thanks to the

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 02:05:53 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 00:31:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 23:01:00 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: This proves nothing. This isn't a proof, this is a definition. This is the definition that is used by all

Re: Project Highlight: The PowerNex Kernel

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:34:04 UTC, ZombineDev wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 21:36:27 UTC, Wild wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:11:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: [...] And the reddit thread is here:

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Sunday, 26 June 2016 at 00:31:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 23:01:00 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: This proves nothing. This isn't a proof, this is a definition. This is the definition that is used by all programming languages out there and all CPUs. It isn't going

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On 26.06.2016 02:54, Guillaume Boucher wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:43:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote: Most reasonable is numerator = quotient * divisor + remainder Which means it can be negative. Depends on the definition. If division truncates towards negative infinity, the remainder

Re: Slice expressions - exact evaluation order, dollar

On 17.06.2016 21:59, kinke wrote: Most interesting IMO though is the question when the slicee's pointer is to be loaded. This is only relevant if the base is an lvalue and may therefore be modified when evaluating the bound expressions. Should the returned slice be based on the slicee's buffer

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:43:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote: Most reasonable is numerator = quotient * divisor + remainder Which means it can be negative. Depends on the definition. If division truncates towards negative infinity, the remainder will always be nonegative (in case of a positive

Re: DbI checked integral

On 6/25/16 7:50 PM, Meta wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 21:46:23 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 14:38:43 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote: I think there is a major problem with the proposed design. when Checked!(int, void) is to behave as an int, why do we need it in

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 23:01:00 UTC, "Smoke" Adams wrote: This proves nothing. This isn't a proof, this is a definition. This is the definition that is used by all programming languages out there and all CPUs. It isn't going to change because someone on the internet think he has a

Re: DbI checked integral

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 21:46:23 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 14:38:43 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote: I think there is a major problem with the proposed design. when Checked!(int, void) is to behave as an int, why do we need it in the first place. I mean we have

Re: Should % ever "overflow"?

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:43:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:33:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: In a checked environment, division may "overflow", e.g. -6 / 2u must be typed as uint but is not representable properly one. How about remainder? I suppose one can

[Issue 12357] Untyped string variable fails silently. No compiler warning given.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12357 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

Re: Call to Action: making Phobos @safe

On 6/25/2016 3:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote: 4. Add @safe to the unittest A unittest that is deliberately unsafe should be annotated with @system. Meaning that any un-annotated unittest needs corrective action one way or the other.

Re: Call to Action: making Phobos @safe

Debugging tip: Templates should almost never be marked @safe or @trusted, as the safety should be inferred. However, to isolate down where the unsafe code actually is, add @safe temporarily to the template declaration. Then, the compiler will tell you which line in the template is unsafe.

Call to Action: making Phobos @safe

Andrei identified a key blocker for D adoption is the incomplete implementation of @safe. I'm working on the compiler end. But Phobos has a lot of code that is pointlessly not @safe, making it frustrating to write @safe code that calls Phobos. Some are listed in Bugzilla, most are not. So

Re: Slice expressions - exact evaluation order, dollar

Ping. Let's clearly define these hairy evaluation order details and add corresponding tests; that'd be another advantage over C++.

[Issue 6278] Regression(2.054 beta): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6278 --- Comment #16 from Walter Bright --- (In reply to hsteoh from comment #15) > Shouldn't it be ContractError? That was my thought, too. The problem with Error (and ContractError is derived from Error) is that it is not

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 21:57:35 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: But i want to flash (e.g. change the CSS class) the buttons one by one and not all at the sime time? How am i going to do that? Okay, i tried it with a new private int-variable which contains the current index of the for-loop, like

Re: core.checkedint

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 01:49:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 06/24/2016 09:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: long x = -1; auto y = array.length + x; I would be hard pressed to acknowledge that as an overflow that needs to be dynamically signaled. And the beauty of two's complement

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 20:39:53 UTC, Mike Wey wrote: The constructor accepts an delegate, witch can access it's context so it has access to some of the data. The functions from GTK are also available like Timeout.add from the linked tutorial:

Re: DbI checked integral

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 14:38:43 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote: I think there is a major problem with the proposed design. when Checked!(int, void) is to behave as an int, why do we need it in the first place. I mean we have int as a basic type. Can't we do: alias Int = int; alias

Re: DbI checked integral

On 6/25/16 10:38 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 21:31:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: By default, if Hook has no state and implements none of these methods, e.g. is void, then Checked!(int, void) is a user-defined type that mimics the behavior of int to the

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On 06/25/2016 05:26 PM, TheDGuy wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:01:09 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: Thanks for your answer. I have to pass the Button object to my timeout function to change the CSS class. But how do i do that within the Timeout constructor? I mean: I have to pass my function

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 20:32:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Thank you for your hard work on this important project. Please ensure that it has a range interface - a range is used as input. You mean that the document source may be a range? In that case, I already implemented a lexer that

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 20:16:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: When I had the gumption to try and make an XML parser range, the idea I had was to have the current element's tag and attributes, all parent elements' tags and attributes, and the currently parsed entity inside the element.

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On 6/23/2016 1:04 PM, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: One month after the official GSoC start, I want to share with you what's in std.experimental.xml and what will hopefully be there Thank you for your hard work on this important project. Please ensure that it has a range interface - a range is

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On 6/25/16 12:26 PM, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 15:59:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Any range API, or plan for? Hi, I'm definitely going to provide a wrapper around the Cursor API, that will provide InputRange access to all the children of the current node (this

[Issue 16202] Floating point types implicitly convert losing precision

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16202 Steven Schveighoffer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: static if enhancement

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 11:27:01 UTC, cym13 wrote: We are talking about early returns (checking for something and returning as soon as possible) which are a well-known and efficient way to reduce indentation levels and increase modularity. You can't come and say "What? You want it to

[Issue 6278] Regression(2.054 beta): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6278 --- Comment #15 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx --- Shouldn't it be ContractError? --

Re: Project Highlight: The PowerNex Kernel

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 15:09:41 UTC, Satoshi wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Not that long ago, Dan Printzell announced his D OS Kernel, PowerNex [1], in this forum. It is now the subject of the first project highlight on the D Blog [2]. [1]

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 17:26:03 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 16:05:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Does D/Phobos has any support for thunks? Made this a while ago:

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 16:05:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Does D/Phobos has any support for thunks? Made this a while ago: http://stackoverflow.com/a/8656294/21501 Thanks, I had a look. Unfortunately it doesn't compile

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 15:59:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Any range API, or plan for? Hi, I'm definitely going to provide a wrapper around the Cursor API, that will provide InputRange access to all the children of the current node (this way the tree structure is maintained). I plan

Re: pure D mpeg2 decoder

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 07:35:51 UTC, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote: Hi all! I saw pure jpeg decoder was announced recently and I decided to publish pure D mpeg2 decoder that I wrote just for myself, with study aims. I didn't test it exhaustively, so don't judge me for bugs) Currently it

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Does D/Phobos has any support for thunks? Made this a while ago: http://stackoverflow.com/a/8656294/21501

Re: Optimizations and performance

On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 16:51:04 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 22:19:47 UTC, Bauss wrote: D definitely needs some optimizations, I mean look at its benchmarks compared to other languages: https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks Welp, I tried making it faster and I

Re: pure D mpeg2 decoder

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 07:35:51 UTC, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote: Hi all! I saw pure jpeg decoder was announced recently and I decided to publish pure D mpeg2 decoder that I wrote just for myself, with study aims. I didn't test it exhaustively, so don't judge me for bugs) Currently it

Re: GSoC 2016 - std.experimental.xml after a month

On 23/06/16 22:04, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: What is working? - Four lexers are provided to abstract different kinds of input from the other layers, providing different speed characteristics; - The parser splits the document into nodes, doing most of the hard work; - A cursor sits on top of the

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 15:26:00 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: } But i get the error: Error: none of the overloads of '__ctor' are callable using argument types (bool delegate(void* userData), int, bool), candidates are: This is the correct error message: Error: none of the overloads of '__ctor'

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:01:09 UTC, TheDGuy wrote: Thanks for your answer. I have to pass the Button object to my timeout function to change the CSS class. But how do i do that within the Timeout constructor? I mean: I have to pass my function and delay time to the constructor, but

Re: DbI checked integral

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 21:31:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: By default, if Hook has no state and implements none of these methods, e.g. is void, then Checked!(int, void) is a user-defined type that mimics the behavior of int to the maximum extent possible. I think there is a major

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:35:39 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:30:22 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: If you want this to work, you need your lambdas to take the casted value as a parameter: Thanks.

Re: static if enhancement

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:19:47 UTC, Claude wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 15:24:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Does anyone else find this annoying? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 -- Andrei My 2 cents. I don't find that annoying at all. It's perfectly normal

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 14:06:51 UTC, John wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: [...] This will only work on X86: version(X86) struct FunctionPtr(TDelegate) if (is(TDelegate == delegate)) { [...] Thanks a lot John, that's fantastic. Kind regards André

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Hi everyone, I have some issue with win32 function SetWindowsHookEx. For this specific funtion there is no possibility to pass extra data (pointer to a class instance to be called) to the callback function. The general solution

Re: Does D has any support for thunks?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote: Does D/Phobos has any support for thunks? It isn't included in the stdlib, but you can use the same C++ they describe in the link in D.

Does D has any support for thunks?

Hi everyone, I have some issue with win32 function SetWindowsHookEx. For this specific funtion there is no possibility to pass extra data (pointer to a class instance to be called) to the callback function. The general solution seems to use thunks. I found s.th. for c++:

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 11:45:40 UTC, Mike Wey wrote: You should change the css class in the timeout_delay function. It's called by the GTK main loop every time the amount of seconds passed to the constructor has passed. And return true if you want to continue to flash the button, and

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:30:22 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: If you want this to work, you need your lambdas to take the casted value as a parameter: void test(T)(T value) { int i; string s; match!(value, int, (val) => i = val, string, (val) => s = val

Re: Fiber local GC

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:49:43 UTC, qznc wrote: Since fibers are bound to a thread, a thread-local GC would help as well. The hard part is how to make it safe. Yes, but a thread is usually long-lived, so you don't get the free-all-no-collection-needed speedup. I don't think it is so

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:39:09 UTC, John wrote: Thanks for the help, both. This appeared to work, until I realised the lambda isn't static: void match(T, cases...)() { static if (cases.length == 1) cases[0](); else static if (cases.length > 2) { static if

Re: Project Highlight: The PowerNex Kernel

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 21:36:27 UTC, Wild wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:11:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 14:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Not that long ago, Dan Printzell announced his D OS Kernel, PowerNex [1], in this forum. It is now the subject of the

Re: Fiber local GC

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 12:01:25 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: 2. You can hand out borrowed fiber-references to the fiber heap when calling non-fiber functions, but fiber-references can never be turned into non-fiber references. This worries me. 1. This adds ref counting or some other

Re: Fiber local GC

On 25/06/2016 11:55 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 11:37:44 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: I've thought about this further, the only hook function we don't currently have is related to global + TLS assignment for memory. We can get away with e.g. new overriding and ~

Re: Fiber local GC

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 11:37:44 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: I've thought about this further, the only hook function we don't currently have is related to global + TLS assignment for memory. We can get away with e.g. new overriding and ~ via the GC proxy (actually a fairly decent way to

Re: GTKD - CSS class color "flash" delay

On 06/24/2016 10:03 PM, TheDGuy wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 16:44:59 UTC, Gerald wrote: Other then the obvious multi-threaded, using glib.Timeout to trigger the reversion of the color change could be an option. http://api.gtkd.org/src/glib/Timeout.html Thanks! I tried this so far:

Re: Fiber local GC

On 25/06/2016 11:00 PM, rikki cattermole wrote: ... snip ... What we want is to be able to explicitly say what the context is for a functions code and declare no globals. @noglobals struct MyContext { @disable this(this); void func() { } } Function calls outside of the

Re: static if enhancement

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:19:47 UTC, Claude wrote: And if some code have too many indentation levels, than it probably means it should be better modularized, hence I'd suggest to split it in several sub-functions, it will be more readable/maintainable. We are talking about early

Re: Fiber local GC

On 25/06/2016 10:33 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Pony has a fiber local GC, which means collection can happen when the fiber is inactive or even altogether skip collection if the fiber is short-lived. Go is currently exploring a Transaction Oriented GC addition to the concurrent GC it

Re: When using the -profile flag is it known behaviour that phobos unit tests fail?

On 6/25/2016 12:52 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote: Done. Good!

Re: Fiber local GC

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 10:33:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: Pony has a fiber local GC, which means collection can happen when the fiber is inactive or even altogether skip collection if the fiber is short-lived. Go is currently exploring a Transaction Oriented GC addition to the

Re: Is there a dmd.exe x86_64 out there?

On 25/06/2016 10:25 PM, Dlangofile wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:39:21 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 9:03 PM, Dlangofile wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 03:29:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 5:57 AM, Dlangofile wrote: Hi all, I'm building a Docker

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:12:12 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:07:19 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: Instead of passing functions to match!, pass pairs of arguments, like this: match!(T, int, writeln("Matched int"), is(T : SomeObject),

Fiber local GC

Pony has a fiber local GC, which means collection can happen when the fiber is inactive or even altogether skip collection if the fiber is short-lived. Go is currently exploring a Transaction Oriented GC addition to the concurrent GC it already has:

Re: Is there a dmd.exe x86_64 out there?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:39:21 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 9:03 PM, Dlangofile wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 03:29:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 5:57 AM, Dlangofile wrote: Hi all, I'm building a Docker Alpine linux image with wine, for being able

Re: static if enhancement

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 15:24:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Does anyone else find this annoying? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 -- Andrei My 2 cents. I don't find that annoying at all. It's perfectly normal IMHO. It may introduce an additional indentation level for

Re: Is there a dmd.exe x86_64 out there?

On 25/06/2016 9:03 PM, Dlangofile wrote: On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 03:29:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 5:57 AM, Dlangofile wrote: Hi all, I'm building a Docker Alpine linux image with wine, for being able to forge Windows executable from my laptop, without having to dual

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 09:07:19 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: Instead of passing functions to match!, pass pairs of arguments, like this: match!(T, int, writeln("Matched int"), is(T : SomeObject), writeln("Derives from SomeObject"); ); Now, in the

Re: static switch/pattern matching

also, there is a subtle bug in matcher. sorry. ;-)

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 08:46:05 UTC, John wrote: Anyone able to improve on it? q hack: template tyma(T, Cases...) { import std.traits; template GetFunc(size_t idx) { static if (idx >= Cases.length) { static assert(0, "no delegate for match"); } else static if

Re: static switch/pattern matching

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 08:46:05 UTC, John wrote: Writing a long series of "static if ... else" statements can be tedious and I'm prone to leaving out the crucial "static" after "else", so I was wondered if it was possible to write a template that would resemble the switch statement, but

Re: Is there a dmd.exe x86_64 out there?

On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 03:29:02 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/06/2016 5:57 AM, Dlangofile wrote: Hi all, I'm building a Docker Alpine linux image with wine, for being able to forge Windows executable from my laptop, without having to dual boot. With my disappointment, I'm not

static switch/pattern matching

Writing a long series of "static if ... else" statements can be tedious and I'm prone to leaving out the crucial "static" after "else", so I was wondered if it was possible to write a template that would resemble the switch statement, but for types. Closest I came up to was this: void

Re: When using the -profile flag is it known behaviour that phobos unit tests fail?

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 22:24:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Please post bug reports to bugzilla. They'll get lost in the n.g. Done. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16204

[Issue 16204] New: When using the -profile flag phobos unit tests fail

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16204 Issue ID: 16204 Summary: When using the -profile flag phobos unit tests fail Product: D Version: D2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: static if enhancement

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 15:24:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Does anyone else find this annoying? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16201 -- Andrei What I think about enchancement of static if is that it could be interesting to have `elif` keyword like in Python, so instead of

Re: Please rid me of this goto

On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 20:34:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 10:33:43 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 10:11:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 08:40:26 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote: On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 20:01:26 UTC,

Re: [OT] ...

Btw, one might take the view that "pown(real x,int y)" is describing monomials: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monomial Whereas "powr(real x,real y)" is a shorthand for "exp(y * log(x))".