On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> [snip]. Precisely scanning unions is tricky since they could mix pointer
> and non pointer types. [snip]
>
Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is scanned...
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
--- Comment #2 from Edwin van Leeuwen ---
Never even considered that tuple! might be able to do this. Sorry for the noise
:)
--
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:54:57 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/01/2016 08:25 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> I will still continue working on it in the hopes it'll get in.
Great news! :)
> I
> discovered that I really enjoyed working on the garbage
collector
If that's not motivation
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 05:19:57 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 03:25:33 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know I'm super late to the party for this, and sorry for
that. While my work on the precise GC didn't go as planned, it
is closer than it was to be
Dne 2.9.2016 v 09:39 wobbles via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
Probably not good for publicity.
meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
code.dlang.org is
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:47 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:27:11 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
>
>> Perhaps @system code should just completely ignore privacy?
>>
>
> it is uncontrollable. imagine attribute
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:23:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
Probably not good for publicity.
meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
code.dlang.org is down too :-(
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 18:45:14 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 18:50:58 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
An article about how outsourcing reduces the need for
Norwegian developers. No links to D other than the image on
top though. I wonder what they searched for to find
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:02:20 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
Probably not good for publicity.
meh. It's the internet. Sometimes servers go down.
"500 - Internal Server Error
Internal Server Error"
Probably not good for publicity.
I was looking for something like FirstOrDefault* from .NET in
phobos. For example, I have this piece of code:
string findBobOrReturnNull(string[] names)
{
auto r = names.find("bob");
if(r.empty) return null;
return r.front;
}
assert(findBobOrReturnNull(["alice", "bob"]) == "bob");
On 09/01/2016 08:25 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
> I will still continue working on it in the hopes it'll get in.
Great news! :)
> I
> discovered that I really enjoyed working on the garbage collector
If that's not motivation enough...
> I was recently accepted to the University of Washington's
On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:27:11 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Perhaps @system code should just completely ignore privacy?
it is uncontrollable. imagine attribute inference: today, your
function was inferred @system, and it sees everything. and
tomorrow you fixed some other things, and now
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 13:16:19 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 10:37:18 UTC, Miguel L wrote:
Also, forgot to specify I am using LDC with -05.
And the version of LDC too please ;-)
LDC version is: ldc2-1.1.0-beta2-win64-msvc
On 02 Sep 2016 07:40, "ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>
>> Allowing access to private members has a lot of implications, e.g.
breaks lots of optimizations b/c you can't know who
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo