On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 09:36:43 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:03:50 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
void main()
{
auto v = ["r", "i", "o"];
assert ("r" in v);
}
Also note that even if it wereimplemented, you search for 'r'
instead of "r". "r" is a
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 08:59:53 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 01:31:09 UTC, Indigo wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 17:32:50 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
Hi,
as the title says, I'm looking for a job opportunity in the
USA (H1B visa sponsorship required).
I'm
On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 09:28:47 codephantom via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:55:03 UTC, Petar Kirov
>
> [ZombineDev] wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 00:19:51 UTC, codephantom
> >
> > wrote:
> >> btw. what was the last compiler you wrote?
> >
>
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 18:32:45 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 21-11-17 11:19, PECman wrote:
On Sunday, 19 November 2017 at 13:39:39 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 19-11-17 08:35, PECman wrote:
I complied the D application with gtkD
successfully.However,I cant run it successfully.My settings
are
On 11/21/2017 11:48 PM, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Hi Walter - I wonder if there is a miscommunication. My understanding is that
the question is whether there should be a built-in conversion from Duration to
float/double in a specific unit of measure, like milliseconds. It sounds as if
your concern
On 22.11.2017 06:50, Walter Bright wrote:
There is another, perhaps obsolete, consideration.
Some CPUs do not have floating point units. C, for example, is carefully
set up so that when you don't need floating point, it isn't required to
have an FPU. This made C usable on cheap processors.
On 22.11.2017 03:22, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/21/2017 1:40 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Computer clocks have discrete ticks, they are not continuous.
That may be true, but the plotting library may still just expect a
list of doubles. What's the point of removing the simple conversion
function that
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:03:50 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
void main()
{
auto v = ["r", "i", "o"];
assert ("r" in v);
}
Also note that even if it wereimplemented, you search for 'r'
instead of "r". "r" is a string, but you would want to search for
a char.
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:55:03 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 00:19:51 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
btw. what was the last compiler you wrote?
https://github.com/eth-srl/psi
https://github.com/tgehr/d-compiler
touché ;-)
nonetheless. I stand
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 00:19:51 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. what was the last compiler you wrote?
https://github.com/eth-srl/psi
https://github.com/tgehr/d-compiler
On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 08:03:50 Fra Mecca via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Why doesn't D have a in keyword for arrays?
>
> The docs explains that you can use in only for associative arrays
> but I don't see the reasons for such decision.
>
>
> Example code:
>
> void main()
> {
> auto v
22.11.2017 02:12, Markus пишет:
snip
I could do the instancing/destruction by functions and write a custom d
class that calls these methods in this()/~this().
This is what I used to do as special members like ctor/dtor did not
supported in D before, but your example of using ctor is
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 08:29:26 UTC, MGW wrote:
Possibly it will be interesting
https://pp.userapi.com/c639524/v639524332/60240/uH3jnxrchik.jpg
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 23:12:33 UTC, Markus wrote:
hi, im trying to interface a cpp class. I'd like to interface a
bigger library and I'm trying to figure out the minimum effort.
Possibly it will be interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTgJaRRfLPk
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
