https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18957
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||C++
Severity|enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18957
Issue ID: 18957
Summary: extern(C++) doesn't mangle 'std' correctly on posix
systems
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
All this talk of CTFE and "compile-time", along with the confusion that
arises from conflating everything done by the compiler into the blanket
term "compile-time" makes me want to scream:
https://wiki.dlang.org/User:Quickfur/Compile-time_vs._compile-time
;-)
tl;dr: D's "compile-time"
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18956
Issue ID: 18956
Summary: latest experimental build crashing a lot
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
I'm sorry about bringing this into here instead of DWT's
subforum, but it's somewhat dead and hasn't been getting a lot of
attention. I decided to finally play around with DWT today and
tried to build the example. I got this:
Performing "debug" build using /usr/bin/dmd for x86_64.
dwt:base
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 05:11:40PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 6/7/2018 10:17 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Exactly!!! Git was built precisely for decentralized, distributed
> > development. Anyone should be (and is, if they bothered to put just
> > a tiny amount of
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18955
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||C++, industry
--- Comment #1 from Manu ---
This
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18955
Issue ID: 18955
Summary: extern(C++) default struct mangling is overridden when
interacting with a `cppmangle = class` tamplate
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18954
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||C++, industry
--- Comment #1 from Manu ---
I don't
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18954
Issue ID: 18954
Summary: extern(C++) ICE when `cppmangle` is used
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18582
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18922
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #2 from
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 04:58:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It would be trivial enough to create a wrapper template so that
you can do something like
immutable n = ctfe!(foo());
e.g.
template ctfe(alias value)
{
enum ctfe = value;
}
Would this be equivalent to using static
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 19:19:55 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
The following narrow test program works fine when compiled with
DMD to 32bit target:
import std.stdio, core.sys.windows.windows, core.runtime;
extern(Windows) int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE
hPrevInstance, LPSTR
On Friday, 8 June 2018 at 00:55:35 UTC, cc wrote:
class CImpl : CCallbackBase {
extern(C++) {
If anyone has any insight to provide it would be greatly
appreciated, thanks!
I've not used any of the C++ interfacing features yet, but my
understanding is the extern(C++) has to apply
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 19:19:55 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
The following narrow test program works fine when compiled with
DMD to 32bit target:
import std.stdio, core.sys.windows.windows, core.runtime;
extern(Windows) int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE
hPrevInstance, LPSTR
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16623
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Friday, 8 June 2018 at 01:07:17 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Shouldn't the property functions' resolution logic take into
account the inherited functions? I had assumed that was the
case (and I was confused by misleading error messages), and
that seems like the more intuitive semantics to me.
I had something like this:
class Bits
{
int width()
{
return _width;
}
void width(int _width)
{
this._width = _width;
}
int _width;
}
class Bool : Bits
{
// make sure a Boolean is always 1 bit
override int width()
{
assert(_width
Hello, I'm attempting to interface with the Steam API DLL in D
and running into some trouble working with callbacks. I'm aware
there's already a project here http://derelict-steamworks.dub.pm/
but it seems to have not yet addressed the same issue. Steam
provides ways to poll for whether an
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18821
--- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/b1aa95ffa6d99816c8d574af39371719e64a97be
Merge pull request #8251 from WalterBright/fix18821
fix Issue
On 6/7/2018 10:17 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Exactly!!! Git was built precisely for decentralized, distributed
development. Anyone should be (and is, if they bothered to put just a
tiny amount of effort into it) able to set up a git server and send the
URL to prospective collaborators. Anyone is
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 23:25:45 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
...
The WinMain exported function works alone well and on 32bit it
also does the console.
On 64 I also tried AllocConsole, but fail. I get the Console
handle with GetConsoleHandle, it sends back a nonzero value.
But as I
On 6/7/2018 4:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Yea, it certainly does have that going for it. And I have no real big objections
to bugzilla. It would be nice, though, if it were better (and more cleanly)
integrated with GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/etc., and if its data were all
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 14:23:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/5/18 6:28 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
Once you do that then I will be able to make an informed
decision rather than doing what you really want, which is
except your world as authority regardless of the real truth.
It's
On 6/7/18 7:16 PM, realhet wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 19:42:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Are you just compiling the 32-bit dmd version with default flags?
Yes, no flags at all and it defaults to a 32bit target. I can use the
console and able to make windows, and able to setup an
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 19:42:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Are you just compiling the 32-bit dmd version with default
flags?
Yes, no flags at all and it defaults to a 32bit target. I can use
the console and able to make windows, and able to setup an opengl
window too.
The console
On 6/7/18 6:57 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 22:23:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
{...}
That a function could return does not mean it will.
int fn (int arg) /*strongly*/ pure
{
if (arg == 42)
return 42;
else (arg < 43)
return fn(--arg);
else
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 23:08:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/7/18 6:58 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:57:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/7/18 5:07 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 =
On 6/7/18 6:58 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:57:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/7/18 5:07 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
Yep, long-standing issue:
On 06/07/2018 04:36 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/6/2018 10:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Keep in mind, if we had been commoditizing and decentralizing
repository hosting, issue tracking, PRs, user accounts, etc. right
from the start like we should've been, then this MS buyout of
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 22:23:09 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
{...}
That a function could return does not mean it will.
int fn (int arg) /*strongly*/ pure
{
if (arg == 42)
return 42;
else (arg < 43)
return fn(--arg);
else
return fn(++arg);
}
do you see the problem?
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:57:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/7/18 5:07 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
Yep, long-standing issue:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:32:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
struct S
{
int* ptr = new int(42);
}
Is that supposed to compile? -> https://run.dlang.io/is/SjUEOu
Error: cannot use non-constant CTFE pointer in an initializer
&[42][0]
On 6/7/18 5:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, June 07, 2018 20:14:19 Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 14:48:23 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
I'm just posting to clear up the misunderstanding that a call
to a pure function can be removed. Actually, even
On 06/07/2018 11:26 PM, Ethan wrote:
The spec isn't clear on this but it uses the same rules as struct field
initialisation, ie it's defined once and copied to each instance on
creation.
https://dlang.org/spec/struct.html#default_struct_init
It says there that "The default initializers may
On 6/7/18 5:07 PM, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
Yep, long-standing issue: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
Almost a decade old!
-Steve
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18706
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
See
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:07:26 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
I'm glad I finally found this out! This is not typical behavior
in most languages is it?
I don't think most languages allow this, and D used to not allow
it either, but then CTFE got class support and it got enabled. If
you
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:07:26 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
I'm glad I finally found this out! This is not typical behavior
in most languages is it?
I'd expect it to be translated to
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:07:26 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
I'm glad I finally found this out! This is not typical behavior
in most languages is it?
I'd expect it to be translated to
On Thursday, June 07, 2018 21:07:26 DigitalDesigns via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> class A;
>
> class B
> {
> A a = new A();
> }
>
> auto b1 = new B();
> auto b2 = new B();
>
> assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
>
>
> I'm glad I finally found this out! This is not typical behavior
> in most languages is
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 21:07:26 UTC, DigitalDesigns wrote:
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
The spec isn't clear on this but it uses the same rules as struct
field initialisation, ie it's defined once and copied to each
instance on creation.
On Thursday, June 07, 2018 11:31:13 jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 22:19:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 06, 2018 18:18:16 jmh530 via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 03:18:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
class A;
class B
{
A a = new A();
}
auto b1 = new B();
auto b2 = new B();
assert(b1.a == b2.a)!!
I'm glad I finally found this out! This is not typical behavior
in most languages is it?
I'd expect it to be translated to something like
class B
{
A a;
this()
{
a = new
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
--- Comment #6 from Ethan Watson ---
The code I'm invoking in my current codebase extracts type data from the
template parameter for object management.
Another workaround would probably be to have a templated this( Type )( ref Type
val ) in the
On Thursday, June 07, 2018 20:14:19 Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 14:48:23 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
> > I'm just posting to clear up the misunderstanding that a call
> > to a pure function can be removed. Actually, even calls to
> > strongly pure functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18847
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/72b2128e6e5dbbc99464d0345fcd4c6692b078c3
Fix Issue 18847 - std.allocator: Region uses .parent
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18847
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Thursday, June 07, 2018 20:02:31 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 10:17 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
>
> wrote:
> > […]
> >
> > Exactly!!! Git was built precisely for decentralized, distributed
> > development. Anyone should be (and is,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
--- Comment #5 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
errr and also while we're at it, perhaps calling `this!(args)` as well, for
forwarding to another ctor in the same class.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
--- Comment #4 from Adam D. Ruppe ---
yeah i agree.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
Then we should allow that call.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
Adam D. Ruppe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||destructiona...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18886
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
--- Comment #1 from
On Tuesday, 5 June 2018 at 14:48:23 UTC, FeepingCreature wrote:
I'm just posting to clear up the misunderstanding that a call
to a pure function can be removed. Actually, even calls to
strongly pure functions cannot always be removed. This is
because there is one thing that a pure function can
On 6/7/18 3:19 PM, realhet wrote:
Hi,
The following narrow test program works fine when compiled with DMD to
32bit target:
import std.stdio, core.sys.windows.windows, core.runtime;
extern(Windows) int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE
hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int iCmdShow)
{
Hi,
The following narrow test program works fine when compiled with
DMD to 32bit target:
import std.stdio, core.sys.windows.windows, core.runtime;
extern(Windows) int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE
hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int iCmdShow)
{
Runtime.initialize;
On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 10:17 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> […]
>
> Exactly!!! Git was built precisely for decentralized, distributed
> development. Anyone should be (and is, if they bothered to put just a
> tiny amount of effort into it) able to set up a git server and
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 05:02:09PM +, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 15:18:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >
> > Now all you have to do is to add operator overloading to make the
> > wrapper type infectious, and a convenience function that can be
> > easily
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:28:26AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> In any case, I've always thought it was absolutely sick that that even
> though GitHub/BitBucket/GitLab/Launchpad/etc. all provide basically
> the same features on top of the standard
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 15:18:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Now all you have to do is to add operator overloading to make
the wrapper type infectious, and a convenience function that
can be easily typed, and you get:
[...]
I'd like to have this in the stdlib, what are the chances?
-Johan
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 03:52:10PM +, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 15:18:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:42:17PM +, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> > > [...]
> > [...]
> >
> > You're on the right track. Now all you have
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 15:18:49 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:42:17PM +, Basile B. via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
[...]
You're on the right track. Now all you have to do is to add
operator overloading to make the wrapper type infectious, and a
convenience
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:42:17PM +, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I don't know if this is a bug but this works:
>
> ```
> module runnable;
>
> struct Byte { byte value; alias value this;}
>
> void main()
> {
> {Byte b; auto c = ~b;} // no message
> {byte b; auto c = ~b;} //
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 11:58:58 UTC, makedgreatagain wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 07:58:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Thanks for you suggestion Joakim.
I try follow your suggestion, get all commit from origin
branch (116 commit by Dan Olson fro IOS brnach).
When I try cherry
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 05:28:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 06/03/2018 11:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
What's your opinion about that? Will you continue using GitHub?
The obvious question is "Will MS use evil/strongarm shenanigans
with GitHub?"
In any case, I've
I don't know if this is a bug but this works:
```
module runnable;
struct Byte { byte value; alias value this;}
void main()
{
{Byte b; auto c = ~b;} // no message
{byte b; auto c = ~b;} // deprecation...
}
```
---
Baz
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 12:32:26 UTC, Arafel wrote:
Thanks for all the answers!
Is it possible to register, say, a base class, and have all the
subclasses then registered automatically?
My idea would be to make it as transparent as possible for the
plugin implementation, and also not
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion about the standard std.signals
library.
Currently it has a strange limitation - you can't pass delegates
that don't belong to an object.
I reviewed the source code an came to conclusion that it can be
easily fixed.
However, the thing that concerns
On 08/06/2018 12:25 AM, tipdbmp wrote:
What other libraries (if any) are part of Phobos?
That is pretty much it.
Thanks for all the answers!
Is it possible to register, say, a base class, and have all the
subclasses then registered automatically?
My idea would be to make it as transparent as possible for the plugin
implementation, and also not having to depend on it.
A.
There is a library that
What other libraries (if any) are part of Phobos?
On 08/06/2018 12:03 AM, drug wrote:
isn't it a niche for THE application that could be written in D?
I don't think D brings anything to the table when it comes to VCS.
It'll be nicer code, but it won't be noticed by users kind of nice.
On the other hand, Weka.IO does bring a lot to the
On 07/06/2018 11:47 PM, tipdbmp wrote:
The following compiles without pragma(lib, ...):
extern(C) {
const(char)* zlibVersion();
}
void main() {
const(char)* sz = zlibVersion();
}
It has already been compiled in as part of Phobos.
07.06.2018 14:12, Vladimir Panteleev пишет:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 05:28:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
I've always felt GitLab was better than GitHub (in large part because
they're sensible enough to support self-hosting), so it's tempting to
use this as a great reason to move
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 07:58:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 05:58:48 UTC, makedgreatagain wrote:
The last IOS cross compiler
https://github.com/smolt/ldc-iphone-dev/releases based on
0.17.0-alpha1, which is 3 years old.
I want to ask for suggestion, how can i build a
The following compiles without pragma(lib, ...):
extern(C) {
const(char)* zlibVersion();
}
void main() {
const(char)* sz = zlibVersion();
}
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 13:28:02 UTC, Arafel wrote:
I know it might not be the most idiomatic D, but as somebody
with mostly a Java background (with some C and just a bit of
C++) it seems something really straightforward to me:
myObject.getClass().getFields() [2].
Also, I know I could
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 22:19:58 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, June 06, 2018 18:18:16 jmh530 via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 03:18:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [snip]
>
> If you haven't yet, I'd suggest reading
Would make a good blog series?
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 05:28:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
I've always felt GitLab was better than GitHub (in large part
because they're sensible enough to support self-hosting), so
it's tempting to use this as a great reason to move to GitLab.
I've been following the
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 15:15:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 06:33:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
I have 2 DMD PR's that show this issue with semaphoreci:
https://semaphoreci.com/dlang/dmd-2/branches/pull-request-8336/builds/1
I don't understand what's wrong, and whether or not
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/41151beba9fdd3a649729f2fae1ef51fd71c725e
Fix issue 15589 - extern(C++) virtual destructors are not put
On 6/6/2018 10:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Keep in mind, if we had been commoditizing and decentralizing repository
hosting, issue tracking, PRs, user accounts, etc. right from the start like we
should've been, then this MS buyout of GitHub would've been entirely irrelevant
to
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 05:58:48 UTC, makedgreatagain wrote:
The last IOS cross compiler
https://github.com/smolt/ldc-iphone-dev/releases based on
0.17.0-alpha1, which is 3 years old.
I want to ask for suggestion, how can i build a cross LDC2
compiler with just betterC function to work.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8161
--- Comment #13 from anonymous4 ---
(In reply to bitwise from comment #11)
> enum Accessibility { Read, Write, ReadWrite }
>
> template isUseableAsFieldOf(T, F, Accessibility access =
> Accessibility.Both)(F fun) {...}
std.traits should provide
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 06:22:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
@@@DEPRECATED_[version]@@@
This is still ambiguous to me. Deprecations are done in stages.
For example:
Stage 1 (version 2.081) - Compiler emits deprecation warning
Stage 2 (version 2.086 = 2.081 + 5) - Compiler emits error
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018 at 20:46:22 UTC, InfiniteDimensional
wrote:
I did register the main derived type and everything seems to
work. Why do I have to reset the registered types?
Do you have to reset the registered types? What happens otherwise?
I still can't have a void* in my class
The last chance for community feedback on DIP 1013, "The
Deprecation Process", is now underway. Please do not leave any
feedback in this thread, but rather in the review thread in the
General forum:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/hwscnvmtrzfcfnppd...@forum.dlang.org
Also, please be sure to
DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", is now ready for final
review. This is a last chance for community feedback before the
DIP is handed off to Walter and Andrei for the Formal Assessment.
Please read the procedures document for details on what is
expected in this review stage:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18953
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||turkey...@gmail.com
The last IOS cross compiler
https://github.com/smolt/ldc-iphone-dev/releases based on
0.17.0-alpha1, which is 3 years old.
I want to ask for suggestion, how can i build a cross LDC2
compiler with just betterC function to work.
Thanks in advance.
94 matches
Mail list logo
