On Tue., 26 Jun. 2018, 11:45 am Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 26 June 2018 at 20:07, Manu via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
>
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 16:17:03 UTC, Timoses wrote:
Doesn't it already offer it?
Here https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html
in the very top right corner you can diverge from master.
However it seems a bit bugged that when selecting something
else than master, it suddenly prints master again
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 16:54:11 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/26/18 12:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/26/18 11:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:25:09AM +, Mike Franklin via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I think the documentation gets published prematur
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 17:12:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
1. The dlang.org repository is backwards -- master generates
the docs for the default dlang.org. I've brought this up
before, still don't und
On Monday, 25 June 2018 at 01:03:03 UTC, David Bennett wrote:
On Friday, 22 June 2018 at 21:37:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If someone wants to figure out how to build an uncomplicated,
straightforward, efficient implementation of text() that we
can be proud of, that would be a nice contribut
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 02:20:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 19:10, Manu wrote:
Some code:
-
struct Entity
{
enum NumSystems = 4;
struct SystemData
{
uint start, length;
}
SystemData[NumSystems] systemData;
@property uint systemBi
On Tuesday, June 26, 2018 10:38:42 Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:17, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
>
> wrote:
> > dmd's inliner is notoriously poor,
>
> I know, but it's still the reference compiler, and it should at least
> to a reasonable job at the kind of D cod
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 17:38:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
I know, but it's still the reference compiler, and it should at
least
to a reasonable job at the kind of D code that it's
*recommended* that
users write.
I get your point, but IMO it's all about efficient allocation of
the manpower we hav
On 26 June 2018 at 20:07, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Then use L
On 26 June 2018 at 20:26, Eugene Wissner via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 18:07:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 18:07:56 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Nicholas Wilson via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> Then use LDC! ;)
>
> Keep LDC u
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 10:43, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Then use LDC! ;)
> >
> > Keep LDC up to date with DMD master daily! ;)
>
> Lik
On 26 June 2018 at 19:41, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>>
>> Then use LDC! ;)
>
> Keep LDC up to date with DMD master daily! ;)
Like what GDC is doing (almost) ;-)
Iain.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:50, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> Then use LDC! ;)
Keep LDC up to date with DMD master daily! ;)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 20:17, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> dmd's inliner is notoriously poor,
I know, but it's still the reference compiler, and it should at least
to a reasonable job at the kind of D code that it's *recommended* that
users write.
That line of code is the sort of
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> 1. The dlang.org repository is backwards -- master generates the docs
> for the default dlang.org. I've brought this up before, still don't
> understand why we don't use stable for the latest dlang.org.
On 6/26/18 12:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/26/18 11:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:25:09AM +, Mike Franklin via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I think the documentation gets published prematurely. The new methods
for the associative arrays should come in the ne
On 6/26/18 11:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:25:09AM +, Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I think the documentation gets published prematurely. The new methods
for the associative arrays should come in the next release, scheduled
for July 1st. https://dlang.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:17:03PM +, Timoses via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 15:51:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Seriously, we need to start implementing versioned docs on dlang.org.
[...]
> Doesn't it already offer it?
>
> Here https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.htm
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 15:51:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:25:09AM +, Mike Franklin via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
I think the documentation gets published prematurely. The new
methods for the associative arrays should come in the next
release, scheduled for Jul
On 6/25/18 7:13 PM, Seb wrote:
Apparently three years ago it was we decided to ban alias this and
opDispatch in the same class.
What are your thoughts on this now?
Is anyone depending on using alias this + opDispatch together like e.g.
in https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6596?
My thoughts
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:25:09AM +, Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> I think the documentation gets published prematurely. The new methods
> for the associative arrays should come in the next release, scheduled
> for July 1st. https://dlang.org/changelog/pending.html#require_u
When I see "DMD" and "performance" in the same sentence, my first
reaction is, "why aren't you using LDC or GDC"?
Seriously, doing performance measurements with DMD is a waste of time,
because its optimizer has been proven time and again to be suboptimal
(har!). DMD frequently produces suboptimal
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 14:33:25 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Tanya hashes any value, also integral types; other hashtables
probably not.
Your intuition is correct here. Most of the tables use
`typeid(key).getHash(&key)`, which for `int` just returns `key`.
= Built-in AA =
General case: `t
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 09:03:10 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
It seems it doesn't work with a branch in dub.sdl. I just
replaced the files in ~/.dub/packages.
And to make tanya perform better than built-in AAs in the first
test, define a hash function:
size_t hasher(int e)
{
return e;
BTW the output is formatted so you can get a sorted list of times
across all trials by piping the output through `sort -n`. That's
also why the tests reusing maps start with ( instead of [, so
they will be grouped separately.
On Friday, 12 January 2018 at 22:44:48 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
As promised [1], I have started setting up a DIP to improve
tuple ergonomics in D:
[...]
What is the status of the DIP? Is it ready to be proposed and
dicussed?
It seems it doesn't work with a branch in dub.sdl. I just
replaced the files in ~/.dub/packages.
On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 at 12:59:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I'd recommend putting in an enhancement request in bugzilla.
Done:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19028
Really, this behaviour at least should be reflected in
`allMembers` and `derivedMembers` documentation.
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 04:17:44 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 03:45:27 UTC, Seb wrote:
Did you by chance also benchmark it with other languages like
C++, Go or Rust?
I didn't since I was evaluating hashtable implementations for
use in a D application.
BTW I'm not su
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 07:25:09 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I think the documentation gets published prematurely. The new
methods for the associative arrays should come in the next
release, scheduled for July 1st.
https://dlang.org/changelog/pending.html#require_update
Mike
Wow, than
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 07:05:44 UTC, Vasniktel wrote:
Hello everyone.
I am wondering about `update` and `require` properties of AAs
which are mentioned to be present here:
https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html#properties
However, this code doesn't compile:
```
import std.stdio;
void main()
Hello everyone.
I am wondering about `update` and `require` properties of AAs
which are mentioned to be present here:
https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html#properties
However, this code doesn't compile:
```
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
class C{}
int[C] aa;
auto a = aa.req
33 matches
Mail list logo
