On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 at 16:30, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 8/4/2018 12:45 AM, Manu wrote:
> > [...]
> I get it, Manu, you don't find my arguments compelling. You've put these forth
> before, and I could repeat myself rebutting each. I expect we're at a dead end
> with that.
So,
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 09:43:13 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 02:39:23 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Cool! Can we now deprecate and eventually jettison C/C++
bindings from druntime, please?
Why?
The C standard library not a true and intrinsic dependency of D,
and is
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 05:53:20 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:24:28 UTC, B Krishnan Iyer
wrote:
I had some questions regarding the project and also needed
some pointers to get started with the project. Also, more it
would be great if more description of the
On 8/2/2018 5:23 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
Because it will affect mangling only, do we have any examples of c/c++ code that
appends _'s to it that is used by the D community?
The __ scheme won't break existing code, and we don't need a survey to show
that.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19142
ag0aep6g changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 20:01:22 UTC, Nikos wrote:
Thank you very much for your feedback. Unfortunately, none of
the above worked.
By the way, the reason I'm trying all this is to create a
Jupyter notebook. I've already made a simple version of it some
time ago
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 22:43:42 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
One benefit of D is as a better glue language that integrates
well with other languages and ecosystems. Many people who know
a bit about D have no idea that interop can work so easily or
well.
So it might be worth mentioning
On 8/4/2018 12:45 AM, Manu wrote:
[...]
I get it, Manu, you don't find my arguments compelling. You've put these forth
before, and I could repeat myself rebutting each. I expect we're at a dead end
with that.
But the fact remains, I've shown both you and Atila how to make things work for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19142
Issue ID: 19142
Summary: ddoc inline code see # as a warning
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 13:15:24 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 01:27:49 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Thanks to Seb and Atila it is now very easy to show a D
program just #includeing C headers. If just works. Modulo
bugs. In time I am hopeful Atila will start to have more
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 20:01:22 UTC, Nikos wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 09:09:11 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 29 July 2018 at 18:14:31 UTC, Nikos wrote:
But when I try to export the whole dmdEngine
export:
auto engine(char[] txt) {
return
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 20:57:32 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 20:10:49 UTC, Kamil Koczurek wrote:
Is there a way to keep track of objects without owning them?
That is, could I have a smart pointer that behaves somewhat
like this:
WeakPtr!Class wptr = getSomeInstance();
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 20:10:49 UTC, Kamil Koczurek wrote:
Is there a way to keep track of objects without owning them?
That is, could I have a smart pointer that behaves somewhat
like this:
WeakPtr!Class wptr = getSomeInstance();
auto obj = wptr.peek; //[1]
if(obj !is null) {
Is there a way to keep track of objects without owning them? That
is, could I have a smart pointer that behaves somewhat like this:
WeakPtr!Class wptr = getSomeInstance();
auto obj = wptr.peek; //[1]
if(obj !is null) {
obj.stuff();
}
[1]: If wptr points to something that is still reachable
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 09:09:11 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 29 July 2018 at 18:14:31 UTC, Nikos wrote:
But when I try to export the whole dmdEngine
export:
auto engine(char[] txt) {
return interpreter(dmdEngine());
}
Can you export an instance of
Thankyou.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19141
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19122
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||snarwin+bugzi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19141
Issue ID: 19141
Summary: Destructors are called for multiple anonymous union
members
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 12:54:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Once you have an alias, it's the original thing in all
respects. So there's no way to get the specific alias that was
used. That's not a bug, but a feature.
Aha. Thanks.
I've tried std.traits.TemplateOf and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19126
--- Comment #12 from Ali Ak ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #11)
>
> I'm still finding trouble understanding why you want to specify immutable
> explicitly as the T value. Why not just mutable T? Then you don't need that
>
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 12:23:17 UTC, vit wrote:
Yes, it isn't possible.
I modify filter a and map from std.algorithm:
void main()@nogc{
import std.experimental.all;
const int j = 2;
int i = 0;
const int[3] tmp = [1, 2, 3];
tmp[]
On 05.08.2018 16:07, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have found something that looks like a bug to me, but also looks like
it could simply be a limitation of the foreach construct.
Consider this code:
struct Foo {}
enum isFoo(alias x) = is(typeof(x) == Foo);
void main()
{
Foo foo;
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 20:03:39 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Looks like you can do it with a "lazy variadic function" [1],
Interesting, thanks. I've made a pull to add a See Also link
about this to the Lazy Parameters docs:
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/2439
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 14:07:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I have found something that looks like a bug to me, but also
looks like it could simply be a limitation of the foreach
construct.
Consider this code:
struct Foo {}
enum isFoo(alias x) = is(typeof(x) == Foo);
void main()
I have found something that looks like a bug to me, but also looks like
it could simply be a limitation of the foreach construct.
Consider this code:
struct Foo {}
enum isFoo(alias x) = is(typeof(x) == Foo);
void main()
{
Foo foo;
assert(isFoo!foo);
static struct X { int i; Foo
On 8/5/18 8:23 AM, vit wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 10:57:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 8/5/18 5:20 AM, vit wrote:
It's possible create something like this without errors?
void main()@nogc{ //Error: function `app.main` is `@nogc`
// yet allocates
On 2018-08-05 10:30, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
You mean the dependency range in dub.selections.json of an app on
code.dlang.org? I would be in favour of it being a range, but I think
that is unusual. Usually people just commit the generated file unedited,
which seems to always be pinned to the
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 10:57:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/5/18 5:20 AM, vit wrote:
It's possible create something like this without errors?
void main()@nogc{ //Error: function `app.main` is `@nogc`
// yet allocates closures with the GC
import
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8537
--
On 8/5/18 5:20 AM, vit wrote:
It's possible create something like this without errors?
void main()@nogc{ //Error: function `app.main` is `@nogc`
// yet allocates closures with the GC
import std.experimental.all;
const int j = 2;
int i = 0;
const
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 10:12:39 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 01:15:07 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:12:05 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 13:26:01 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
That is a very long stacks trace and combined with the very
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
Issue ID: 19140
Summary: [REG master] AssertError@dmd/ctfeexpr.d(229):
Assertion failure
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19140
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 09:20:21 UTC, vit wrote:
It's possible create something like this without errors?
void main()@nogc{ //Error: function `app.main` is `@nogc`
// yet allocates closures with the GC
import std.experimental.all;
const int j = 2;
int i =
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 01:15:07 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:12:05 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 13:26:01 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
That is a very long stacks trace and combined with the very
short stack trace on OSX, this is probably a stack
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19139
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
It's possible create something like this without errors?
void main()@nogc{ //Error: function `app.main` is `@nogc`
// yet allocates closures with the GC
import std.experimental.all;
const int j = 2;
int i = 0;
const int[3] tmp = [1, 2, 3];
tmp[]
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 08:01:47 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Btw I *had* ("And I'd be glad to mentor you on this :)", here
on July 24th).
Thanks for remembering me why I now better enjoy the Crystal
community...
Sorry, I seem to have missed that. But to quote from the SAoC
page [1]:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 05:22:44 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 04:47:42 UTC, tanner00 wrote:
Hi, I’m interested in working on this project and just wanted
to touch base. Is there any word on who will be mentoring this
project? I’m entering college this fall but
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 17:53:45 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 19:41:32 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
But if you commit it, and a compiler deprecation causes a
dependency in that pinned version to fail to compile, then
your app won't compile either, even though your
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 05:16:50 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 04:47:42 UTC, tanner00 wrote:
[...]
Hi, I’m interested in working on this project and just wanted
to touch base. Is there any word on who will be mentoring this
project? I’m entering college this fall
On 05/08/2018 5:22 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
The project is mostly about creating high-performance,
resource-efficient 2D software rasterizer, something like this
(http://nothings.org/gamedev/rasterize/) or
On 2018-07-31 09:17, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what's the signature of the built-in assert. It
does not seem that I can define a similar function myself.
First attempt:
void myAssert(bool cond, string msg) @nogc nothrow;
No, because msg gets evaluated unconditionally.
46 matches
Mail list logo
