Is it ok to use:
In place:
trim( string )
replace( string, from, to )
or Copy:
trim( string, outstring )
replace( string, from, to, outstring )
"Jonathan M Davis" a écrit
Why are you trying to change the meaning of Open Source ?
Open Source comes with principles. It comes with a spirit. It about freedom.
It's about *freely* sharing knowledge, tools, ...
It does not come for more rights for the one who started distributing the
knowledg
> I think you're mixing up "Open Source" with "Free Software".
No.
Aren't you mixing up free with $ ?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
and read some of the history of the FSF.
There are free (0 $) products/software that comes with no source and a
little freedom.
Some vendors a
> Making optlink open source won't make any difference. Few are skilled at
> asm anymore, and likely none of them would want to work on optlink for
> free.
That's true. But the real problem is not optlink. Optlink is a very good
linker.
The problem is OMF. 11 years ago OMF was a good choice. B
>
> Changing the object module format is not sufficient. The symbolic debug
> info would have to be changed (and Microsoft's is undocumented) and then
> there's the dependency on Microsoft's C runtime library if linking with VC
> generated object files.
I found some doc there:
http://pierrel
I found this:
SBS WALK32 Win32 Assembly Language Kit Version 1.00
there:
http://www.programmersheaven.com/download/355/download.aspx
The file WALK32_1.zip contains the source code (in asm) of a 32 bits OMF
linker.
May be it can help...
Is this more understandable:
I think he wants to know what part of DMD produce the json output.
He wants to know how is implemented the production of the Json file.
He wants to extract the code/function responsible for the production of json
and reuse this code in an IDE.
May be he wants to study
