Perhaps a module std.scripting could help quite a lot, too.
module std.script;
public import std.stdio, std.file, std.process, std.algorithm, ... etc
I use at least some of these for most of my programs/scripts. And
std.all is probably a bit too heavy.
std.script could basically fetc
Gary Whatmore писал(а) в своём письме Thu, 11 Nov 2010
20:07:35 +0600:
Alexander Malakhov Wrote:
...
Maybe it would be better to just make rdmd to surround source code with:
//- rdmd generated text BEGIN
public import std.stdio, ...
void main( string[] args ){
//- rdmd generated
Andrei Alexandrescu писал(а) в своём
письме Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:12:33 +0600:
On 11/11/10 5:50 AM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
Maybe it would be better to just make rdmd to surround source code with:
//- rdmd generated text BEGIN
public import std.stdio, ...
void main( string[] args
Adam D. Ruppe писал(а) в своём письме Fri, 12
Nov 2010 23:13:13 +0600:
Alexander Malakhov wrote:
import std.stdio; // 1. will not compile
I wrote a little rund helper program, and a PHP style D interpreter
in another thread a couple days ago, that solves this by a simple
string scan
Andrei Alexandrescu писал(а) в своём
письме Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:44:18 +0600:
On 11/12/10 9:21 AM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
I was unable to pass file to --eval, is this possible ?
It is:
rdmd --eval $(cat filename)
I know... it's cheating :o). But if you want to pass a file, wh
Leandro Lucarella писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 13 Nov
2010 21:13:42 +0600:
retard, el 13 de noviembre a las 08:24 me escribiste:
> void main(string[] args){
>
> import std.stdio; // 1. will not compile> void main(string[]
args){
>writeln("hello");
>}
<...> the 1) p
spir писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 13 Nov 2010
16:15:39 +0600:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:42:38 -0500
sybrandy wrote:
> 2. Make Windows to open .d files with rdmd by default, so I could run
them with simple double-click
Yes. Maybe Alexander meant this for users rather than for developpers.
Hmm... If that's of no interest, could someone state it explicitly.
So that I'll be sure my message wasn't just overlooked or lost
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 00:04:31 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 9 January 2012 21:29, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/9/2012 11:45 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Please fix the wikipedia entry!
With what? Make it say 2003 for D1 and 2007 for D2?
On Monday, 9 January 2012 at 19:46:03 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, January 09, 2012 11:37:50 Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/9/2012 10:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I suspect that part of the problem is that Wikipedia lists D
> as
> appearing in 1999. And, of course, since D2 didn't sta
On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 18:02:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/29/2011 9:13 PM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
Hmm... If that's of no interest, could someone state it
explicitly.
So that I'll be sure my message wasn't just overlooked or lost
I certainly don't mind usi
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 09:05:48 UTC, Alexander Malakhov
wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 18:02:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/29/2011 9:13 PM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
Hmm... If that's of no interest, could someone state it
explicitly.
So that I'll be sure my mess
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 18:56:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Just pick one and do a pull request for it.
Should it be for
* all content (I think, it will be useful - e.g. for citations),
* or the logo only for now ?
And b.t.w., there is no license on the code of the site.
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 18:58:41 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
On 01/10/2012 08:47 AM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
D1 changelog starts with 1.001, 2007-01-23
D 0.00 was released on 9 December 2001.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html#new000
Oh, missed that links. Thanks!
On Tuesday, 10 January 2012 at 12:08:41 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Alexander Malakhov:
Other languages have just 1 date. I think wikipedia's editors
would resist if D will be different.
A solution is to have two Wikipedia pages, una for D1 and one
for D.
Bye,
bearophile
I believe that
On Thursday, 12 January 2012 at 04:18:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/11/2012 5:22 PM, Alexander Malakhov wrote:
Should it be for
* all content (I think, it will be useful - e.g. for
citations), * or the logo
only for now ?
And b.t.w., there is no license on the code of the site.
Just
On Thursday, 12 January 2012 at 06:17:43 UTC, a wrote:
Alexander Malakhov Wrote:
And even if that will happen, D1 page most likely will be
deleted later due to little visits count
They are actually deleting pages due to low visit counts? This
is just wrong.
Turns out I was wrong. I was
Don писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:21:06
+0600:
Exactly. It is NOT the same as the 8 & 16 bit case. The thing is, the
fraction of cases where the MSB is important has been decreasing
*exponentially* from the 8-bit days. [...]
Some facts to back your opinion:
* today's most
Russian publisher "Символ-Плюс" (Symobl-Plus) now is translating TDPL and
they are asking for volunteers to
* help translating guy with technical details
* read final version
If you wish to help, add your contacts on forum:
http://www.symbol.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=363
--
Vladimir Panteleev писал(а) в своём письме
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:54:14 +0600:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:10:29 +0200, Alexander Malakhov
wrote:
Russian publisher "Символ-Плюс" (Symobl-Plus) now is translating TDPL
and they are asking for volunteers to
* help translatin
Simen kjaeraas писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 19
Mar 2011 04:17:13 +0600:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:02:03 +0100, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:08:24 +0200, Alexander Malakhov
wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev писал(а) в своём
письме Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:54:14 +0600:
On Wed
Andrei Alexandrescu писал(а) в своём
письме Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:57:14 +0700:
As I mentioned, the issues involved are of increasing subtlety. As you
wrote, C programmers iterate upward like this:
...
Maybe add this to http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/rationale.html (and
btw, I don't see "r
Steven Schveighoffer писал(а) в своём письме Fri, 06
Aug 2010 18:28:41 +0700:
2. It seems like the documentation is HTML written as ddoc. I see $(P)
tags, $(LI) tags, etc. Can't we just write it as HTML?
I have had exactly same thought when I've first seen DDoc a week ago
I think man
Andrei Alexandrescu писал(а) в своём
письме Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:03:33 +0700:
Time to zero in on the overall design and start working on the content.
Please give the design one more round of comments.
Thanks,
Andrei
1. There should be "Contibute" section on the site with subsections
{C
24 matches
Mail list logo
