se areas was very light
in my estimation. So whatever D has to offer in these areas, if there
are really impovements, is either lacking in the D documentation or does
not really exist for me.
Edward Diener
On 11/20/2012 10:04 PM, G. wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 02:27:08 UTC, Edward Diener wrote:
Is there a downloadable spec for the D version 2 language, in either
PDF or HTML format ?
The HTML version is in the ZIP with dmd...
Thanks !
On 11/20/2012 9:53 AM, Dan wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 02:27:08 UTC, Edward Diener wrote:
Is there a downloadable spec for the D version 2 language, in either
PDF or HTML format ?
I got it from amazon for kindle for $0.99.
http://www.amazon.com/D-Programming-Language-Specification
Is there a downloadable spec for the D version 2 language, in either PDF
or HTML format ?
Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ai9uc/whats_cs_biggest_mistake/
This reminds me of the Java idiots when Java first came out. They
discussed C endlessly trying to prove Java's supremacy as the new
premier language, and either completely ignored that C++ exist
Lutger wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
I am considering discussing all of the above in detail in TDPL, but I am
afraid that some refugees from other languages will be shocked.
Please, it's much more important to write a good book than to avoid possibly
offending the sensibilities of
Justin Johansson wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier Wrote:
As for the max of an empty set, you can just return zero.
Well you could return -1, 99 or any arbitrary integer for that matter; just that it
doesn't make sense to do that from a pure maths perspective. Mathematicians have spent
centuries tr
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Well repeat should probably
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Well repeat should probably always take a delegate since most
likely,
you&#x
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Well repeat should probably always take a delegate since most likely,
you're going to be passing it a lambda. However I agree
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Well repeat should probably always take a delegate since most likely,
you're going to be passing it a lambda. However I agree that it would
be very, very nice to be able to make APIs
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
In C# when you define a function that takes an out or ref parameter,
when invoking that function you must also specify ref or out. For example:
void fun(ref uint x, double y);
uint a = 1;
double b = 2;
fun(ref a, b);
When I first started using C# it really annoyed me th
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a strong dose of D!!
http://java.dzone.com/articles/why-java-doesnt-need-operator
The comments bounce between "operator overloading is always bad because you can do idiotic
things with it" and "operator overloading is essential because sometime
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
I argued for this in the past on this NG but still no one seems to
have picked up the idea that a full reflection library for D,
supported fully by the compiler, would be a great thing. It would
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Edward Diener wrote:
I argued for this in the past on this NG but still no one seems to
have picked up the idea that a full reflection library for D,
supported fully by the compiler, would be a great thing. It would also
allow RAD programming with D outside of the
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello Andrei,
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Stdout.formatln("{}", __FUNCTION__);
I think instead of __FUNCTION__ we'll define a much more comprehensive
static reflection facility.
for the above case I think __FUNCTION__ is as good as it will get.
Define i
16 matches
Mail list logo
