BCS wrote:
> Hello GirlProgrammer,
>
>> For TWENTY YEARS??? Early adopters?? Something is awry.
>
> 9 years:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html#new001
>
> And 1.0 was only about 3 years ago:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_001
I
Mike Farnsworth wrote:
> GirlProgrammer Wrote:
>
>> BCS wrote:
>>> Hello GirlProgrammer,
>>>
>>>> If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it?
>>>> Indeed, why isn't hardly anyone using it?
>>>>
dsimcha wrote:
> == Quote from GirlProgrammer (angelinast...@hairdressers.com)'s
> article
>> If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it?
>> Indeed, why isn't hardly anyone using it?
>
> Same reasons why people use any old, crufty leg
BCS wrote:
> Hello GirlProgrammer,
>
>> If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it?
>> Indeed, why isn't hardly anyone using it?
>>
>
> Because qunatity of D libraries sucks and because the D tool chains
> suck and because the D in
If D doesn't suck, and is better than C++ why am I not using it? Indeed,
why isn't hardly anyone using it?
D is an exercise in futility.
D is melanoma.
D is melodrama.
D is a waste of time and effort.
D is vindication for Tom Pretty and the Hearttakers.
D is a crime against humanity.
D is the cause of cancer.
D is a cult.
D is a monument to stupidity.
D is bad.
D is college.
D is snakeoil.
D is "the dev
