too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
Hello! My first post to this newsgroup was a little bit more than 6 months ago and today I've decided to leave D and use C(P)ython + Qt for our open-source project of writing multi-platform desktop application. The D community is very nice and supportive, Walter, Andrei co. are working hard,

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:26:49 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: Gour, please disregard the troll above. :-) If you're going with Python and Qt, I'd wholeheartedly recommend this book: http://www.qtrac.eu/pyqtbook.html Yeah...I just got reply from Mark if he is planning

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:51:49 -0500 Caligo iteronve...@gmail.com wrote: And I don't think GUI programming is the first reason people come to D. Well, http://d-programming-language.org/ page says: D is a multi-paradigm programming language that combines a principled approach with a focus on

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:45:59 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: For what it's worth, the examples from Mark's book still compile with Python 2.7 and the latest PyQt bindings. And PyQt itself comes with examples that are stored in Python\lib\site-packages\pyqt4\examples\ .

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:52:36 -0400 jasonw u...@webmails.org wrote: If you build a desktop application, D isn't the best choice, but you can still argue to your boss to use it instead because of your personal productivity issues. There's no other logical reason to use D instead of C++/Qt or

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:11:43 -0500 Andrew Wiley debio...@gmail.com wrote: Frankly, if your definition of not ready is that the compiler isn't packaged for you, D isn't the right community to begin with. First of all, there is no 64bit compiler for FreeBSD. I was researching about gdc and Iain

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:45:06 -0700 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote: I'd also like to know which bugzilla entry has that patch! See: https://bitbucket.org/qtd/repo/wiki/Home and https://bitbucket.org/qtd/repo/wiki/DmdPatch Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world,

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:44:20 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote: But you've opened this topic because D2 is not ready, and now you want to switch to Python 3 which might not be ready yet as well? E.g. see: python3wos.appspot.com Fortunately, Python comes with the big

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:49:34 + (UTC) Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote: There should be little reason why the compiler won't build/work sweet as roses - as no one's tested though, there may be some gaps in the C bindings that trigger static asserts, throw undefined identifier errors,

Re: too early for D2 and too late for D1

2011-04-17 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:54:30 +0200 Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com wrote: My view, is the D community right now are thinking long and hard about their own needs, and less of the needs of their users. (For a language, the application programmer IS the user.) Maybe even rightly so,

Re: dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-11 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:56:25 -0700 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote: There's just too many other bugs and issues that need to be addressed. So, it sucks, but it's not all that big a deal. Fair-enough...I just commented that language compilers are usually not applications which are

Re: dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-11 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 03:26:26 -0700 Ruben chrom...@hybridsource.org wrote: Let me address this, since I wrote the ldc, dmd, and dmd2 Makefiles in FreeBSD ports, after getting permission from Walter. Thank you for your work. I simply marked the port as i386 since I read that there wasn't a

Re: dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-10 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
yOn Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:54:55 -0700 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote: So, yeah, it sucks that dmd is only a 32-bit binary, and there are currently no plans for it become a 64-bit binary, It's really strange to have 32bit executable on 64bit OS these days and I?m running 64bit OS for

Re: dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-10 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:15:50 -0500 Andrew Wiley debio...@gmail.com wrote: I run 64 bit Windows 7, where around 70% of my applications are 32 bit, and 64 bit Arch Linux, where multilib lets me install the 32 bit version of most applications. If you go through the Linux kernel archives, you'll

Re: dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-09 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 01:26:49 + (UTC) Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote: There is not plan to have dmd a 64bit executable. There have been reports that you can get it to build but support for it does not exist. However if you are interested in writing 64bit programs the 32bit

dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64 (or dmd2 on FreeBSD)

2011-04-08 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
Hello, I'm running Free/PC-BSD desktop now, and here is dmd-2 experience: [gour@atmarama] /home/gour# cd /usr/ports/lang/dmd2/ [gour@atmarama] /usr/ports/lang/dmd2# make install clean === dmd2-2.052 is only for i386, while you are running amd64. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/dmd2.

Re: GUI library for D

2011-04-05 Thread Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:06:26 +0200 Matthias Pleh j...@konrad.net wrote: I think other companies will have similar decision. So, I think, to help D to get more accepted in the buisiness world, one requirement would be a good GUI library. Coming from the Haskell I can say that e.g. gtk2hs