Eh, possibly if you're used to a language - like english - that's
mostly only lowercase letters in the first place.
I don't see what your problem with comprehending "GH is what
everyone is using for contributions, therefore if you're planning
on making a contribution you should probable do it
On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:28:30 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 7/17/14, 3:13 PM, Frustrated wrote:
Are those that say the GC is fine and works for 90-95% of apps
without
issue just ignorant? Or are they arrogant?
We probably do webapps and other stuff that is not real-time. A
GC there
The specific problem here was when working with std.json.
std.json distinguishes between UINTEGER and INTEGER, so I had
code like
static if(is(T : ulong)) {
// must be UINTEGER
} else static if(is(T : long)) {
// can be either INTEGER or UINTEGER
}
I've since found out about isSigned
isImplicitlyConvertible!(int,ulong) is true. Maybe this is just
me, but I get the impression that this is quite nuts. Why is an
implicit conversion from a signed to an unsigned type possible?
The other way round would be at least somewhat understandable if
there's a static check that the values
Um yeah... I really don't mean to be disrespectful, but I don't
think this is the place to discuss terminology.
I'm trying to use the LuaD library right now... unfortunately,
I've run into somewhat of a roadblock.
This doesn't work (assertion failure in dmd's backend/cgcs.c:351,
which has apparently something to do with bitops... there's an
assert(0) there and I'm not really sure why).
import luad.a
Sorry, I'm not sure how to edit posts, it's 6am and I kinda
didn't get any sleep yet, so excuse me if I'm a bit confused
right now. The second example was supposed to be
state.globals.get!.
