Re: C++ guys hate static_if?

2013-03-12 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 3/9/2013 10:10 AM, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 17:51:31 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 03/09/2013 03:15 AM, Artur Skawina wrote: - static-if not creating scopes /is/ confusing, but what would be a better alternative? I am surprised that and are never mentioned:

Unable to compile on Windows 7 64bit

2012-08-04 Thread Hans Uhlig
I just downloaded a copy of D-IDE and it downloaded a fresh copy of 2.060 and I tried to compile a brand new hello world. Anyone explain what I might have incorrectly setup? main.d: import std.stdio, std.cstream; void main(string[] args){ writeln(Hello World!); din.getc(); }

Re: SDC ddmd

2011-12-19 Thread Hans Uhlig
Are you building SDC in the same fashion as clang by chance where the pieces are modular and usable else ware? (such as the parser being able to be used in an ide?) On 12/9/2011 10:25 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote: On Saturday, �� December 2011 at 05:48:18 UTC, dolive wrote: Why do need to

Re: D1 to be discontinued on December 31, 2012

2011-12-15 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/13/2011 1:59 PM, Bane wrote: Walter Bright Wrote: On 12/13/2011 12:52 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2011-12-13 19:55, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/13/2011 9:47 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: If I recall correctly Walter has said he will continue to support D1 as long as there are users.

Re: D1 to be discontinued on December 31, 2012

2011-12-15 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/14/2011 1:16 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2011-12-14 10:08, Long Chang wrote: I use dwt and tango for some project recent. Cool to here that's someone is using DWT. Before dwt2 and minid and other cool project is ready for d2, I will still need D1. Exactly and see, the D1 users

Re: If I had my way

2011-12-13 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/10/2011 5:33 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:36:19 -0800, Trass3r u...@known.com wrote: Floating point arithmetic benchmarks have long hurt us, and 64-bit generation on OSX is a gating issue. The disastrous Windoze toolchain as well. F*** OMF. +1! x64 on Windows will

Re: If I had my way

2011-12-13 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/11/2011 4:13 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote: Am 10.12.2011 21:35, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu: On 12/10/11 2:22 PM, maarten van damme wrote: Just for fun I wanted to create a program as little as possible, compiled without garbage collector/phobos/... and it turned out that compiling without

Re: If I had my way

2011-12-13 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/11/2011 11:32 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/11/11 12:17 PM, Chad J wrote: On 12/11/2011 11:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/11/11 9:14 AM, Chad J wrote: I think one thing that could would be (optional) reference counting for transitively atomic types. Of course, this is

Re: d-programming-language.com

2011-12-12 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/11/2011 1:26 PM, Peter Alexander wrote: On 11/12/11 1:52 AM, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/10/2011 4:46 PM, Peter Alexander wrote: I think either would be fine, but having to use the command line for anything on Windows is a no-no these days in terms of usability. Since dmd is a command

Re: d-programming-language.com

2011-12-12 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/10/2011 9:52 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Jonathan M Davis Wrote: In fact, as much of the documentation- generation as possible should be in ddoc IMHO. That way, anyone can get reasonable documentation for their own projects. I agree to an extent, but at the same time, I like keeping ddoc

Re: is d-runtime non-gc safe?

2011-12-05 Thread Hans Uhlig
Ok, this is probably a silly question but why are the array appending operations dependent on the GC. Why cant you allocate from a fixed pool? or can you it just requires writing your own malloc/free implementation? On 12/5/2011 5:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2011

Re: Could D benefit from JIT compiling?

2011-12-05 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 12/2/2011 7:46 AM, Xinok wrote: Reading through the 'Java Scala' thread, I've realized there are some benefits to dynamic code generation vs statically compiled code. Things like unrolling loops, devirtualizing functions, etc. So it made me wonder, could D benefit from such technology, not

Re: boost crowd.

2011-12-02 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 11/28/2011 9:40 AM, Timon Gehr wrote: On 11/28/2011 05:41 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote: Separate hand written specification is rulez for human. It is best short module description (with some useful manually written comments). I like it more then autogenerated docs (by doxygen and so on).

Re: [std.database]

2011-12-02 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 10/9/2011 2:50 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2011-10-08 19:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: 1. If we build a D wrapper for ODBC, then we allow people to write code for any database that has an ODBC driver. This, assuming we commit to ODBC as D's standard database interface, would complete the

Re: Please remove misleading examples from D's website

2011-11-30 Thread Hans Uhlig
On 11/30/2011 9:53 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote: The reason why i wrote what i wrote is simple - so people who read legacy D code understand it has been removed or deprecated. Then we need documentation versioning. Choose your version and get the current documentation. Things not in the current