On Monday, 4 July 2016 at 05:08:34 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 07/04/2016 01:20 AM, Hiemlick Hiemlicker wrote:
I have thread. It locks up. If I changed from a bool val it is
using
from shared to __gshared it works. I checked the address
inside and
outside of the thread and they are different for
version(Windows)
void main()
{
import std.random;
while(getchar() != EOF)
{
auto x = new int[std.random.uniform(100, 1000)];
writeln("");
bThread.Now();
}
}
more or less, ends up with a huge
On Monday, 4 July 2016 at 01:36:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 3 July 2016 at 23:20:35 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
The only difference is that the thread is a windows
CreateThread. I guess D doesn't know about such threads and
hence shared doesn't extend across to them?
The
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 01:51:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Couple of things could be happening.
1) Alignments are off, aligning of data really really matters
Where? I rewrote the code to use size_t and same problem. If
alignments were off chances are it wouldn't exhibit the issues in
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 03:54:26 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 2 July 2016 at 00:08:10 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
I use a struct with static members so I do not have to
instantiate it. It is essentially a singleton. I want all the
variables to be __gshared. I guess I have
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 17:52:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 17:26:03 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 16:05:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 13:44:48 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Does D/Phobos has any support for thunks?
The following code works on dmd x64. Fails on dmd x32 and ldc
x64. The problem is the passed variable.
import std.stdio;
version (Windows)
{
import core.sys.windows.windows;
void makeExecutable(ubyte[] code)
{
DWORD old;
VirtualProtect(code.ptr, code.length,
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 23:36:35 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 23:26:19 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 23:03:17 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 22:47:21 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
Ok, Does that mean
void main()
{
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 23:03:17 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 22:47:21 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
what exactly does this do? are all members _gshared?
In this case __gshared is a complete NOOP. __gshared has only
an effect on variables. It prevents them to reside in
what exactly does this do? are all members _gshared?
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 18:59:19 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I was playing around with some Eponymous Templates. I had been
under the impression that Implicit Function-Template
Instantiation (IFTI) meant that you don't have to explicitly
instantiate all functions. However, it seems like there are
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 02:24:55 UTC, captaindet wrote:
is there an alignment guarantee for core.stdc.stdlib.malloc?
more specifically, using DMD and compiling for 32bit on
windows, can i assume proper alignment for int or uint
variables?
background: i like to re-use a (ubyte) buffer,
12 matches
Mail list logo
